Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel
Public Joint Stock Company Mining and Metallurgical Company Norilsk Nickel NILSY Peers
See (NILSY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NILSY | $3.02 | N/A | 4.6B | 0.63 | $4.83 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.00 | -0.01% | 126.9B | 11.16 | $2.24 | +4.96% |
| RTNTF | $76.57 | +0.09% | 106.4B | 10.81 | $7.08 | +3.07% |
| RTPPF | $62.00 | -1.54% | 106B | 8.77 | $7.07 | +6.48% |
| GLCNF | $3.72 | +1.09% | 44.7B | -28.62 | -$0.13 | +3.09% |
| GLNCY | $7.39 | +1.39% | 44.4B | -28.43 | -$0.26 | +2.94% |
| GMBXF | $5.56 | +3.04% | 43.3B | 12.09 | $0.46 | +4.59% |
| NGLOY | $15.15 | +1.41% | 36.8B | -11.93 | -$1.27 | +2.15% |
| AAUKF | $30.28 | +2.25% | 36.7B | -11.97 | -$2.53 | +2.14% |
| FSUMF | $10.50 | +1.45% | 32.3B | 8.27 | $1.27 | +8.43% |
Stock Comparison
NILSY vs BHPLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BHPLF trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs RTNTF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 106.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while RTNTF trades at $76.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs RTPPF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while RTPPF trades at $62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs GLCNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while GLCNF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -28.62. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs GLNCY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while GLNCY trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -28.43. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs GMBXF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while GMBXF trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs NGLOY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while NGLOY trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs AAUKF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AAUKF trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FSUMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FSUMF trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FSUGY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FSUGY trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs CMCLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CMCLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs TCKRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs IVPAF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while IVPAF trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs BOLIF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs BDNNY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BDNNY trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs JXMNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SHTLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SHTLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs IPOAF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while IPOAF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 29.33. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ABML Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs STMNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while STMNF trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 55.95. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs SMMYY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SMMYY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PUTKF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs LYSCF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LYSCF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 172.33. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PUTKY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PUTKY trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.35. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs LYSDY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LYSDY trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 172.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PAEKY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 18.95. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs MALRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MALRY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MALRY trades at $15.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FLMMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PILBF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PILBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -88.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs CHZQ Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs NGXXF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while NGXXF trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -38.29. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PTNDY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs MIMTF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MIMTF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PTNDF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PTNDF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs AZZVF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs AFBOF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AFBOF trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.96. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs DWMNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SOUHY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SOUHY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs IIDDY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs NICMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while NICMF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs IPGDF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while IPGDF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ERMAY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ERMAY trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.67. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ERMAF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 97.79. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs DETRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while DETRF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ADTLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ADTLF trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ILKAY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ILKAY trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs AZRMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs ADMLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ADMLF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs BQSSF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BQSSF trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ILKAF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ILKAF trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FMCXF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 927.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FMCXF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs STTSY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ATUSF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 910.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ATUSF trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs LINRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 907.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LINRF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs AFMJF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 903.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AFMJF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs AUSDF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs TAOFF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 705.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while TAOFF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs AMVMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 693.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AMVMF trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -56.58. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PXMFF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 619.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PXMFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MFRVF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs VULNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 598.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while VULNF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -10.58. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs CTJHF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ALMTF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ALMTF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PKREF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PKREF has a market cap of 510.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PKREF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PKREF's P/E ratio is -18.68. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PKREF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PKREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MJDLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 500.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MJDLF trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs TTNNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs OSTTF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MCRZF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs BIRNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MCHHF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MCHHF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FGOVF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 387.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FGOVF trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -73.20. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs NQMIY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs REEMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while REEMF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MNXMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MNXMF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -62.61. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs CTJHY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ERLFF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 338.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs KMRPF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs JMXXF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 333.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while JMXXF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MLYF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs CGMLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 322.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CGMLF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -20.75. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs AUMTF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs LTSRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 305.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LTSRF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SLGGF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs MLXEF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 298.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while MLXEF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ERDCF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 291M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ERDCF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -79.75. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SVMLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SVMLF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs ARAFF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs FWEDF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 266.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while FWEDF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs LRSRF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs STQNF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs PMETF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PMETF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SMTSF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SMTSF has a market cap of 248.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SMTSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SMTSF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SMTSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SMTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs SRHYY Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while SRHYY trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs RXRLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs LTHHF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
NILSY vs BSRUF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs PTTMF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NILSY.
NILSY vs CILLF Comparison
NILSY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NILSY stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NILSY is priced at $3.02, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NILSY currently has a P/E ratio of 0.63, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NILSY's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NILSY and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).