Nickel Asia Corporation
Nickel Asia Corporation (NCKAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCKAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCKAF | $0.08 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 8.11 | $0.01 | +2.36% |
| BHPLF | $27.50 | -1.43% | 136.5B | 12.01 | $2.24 | +4.63% |
| CHZQ | $0.00 | -0.00% | 133.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RTNTF | $71.22 | -6.58% | 119.3B | 11.93 | $6.28 | +5.11% |
| RTPPF | $62.45 | +1.95% | 98.6B | 9.67 | $6.28 | +6.14% |
| GMBXF | $6.70 | -2.90% | 52.5B | 13.50 | $0.50 | +3.59% |
| CYLYF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 49.6B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLCNF | $3.99 | +1.31% | 47.4B | -24.94 | -$0.16 | +2.88% |
| GLNCY | $7.98 | +2.84% | 47.2B | -24.37 | -$0.32 | +2.76% |
| FSUMF | $12.75 | -2.30% | 39.8B | 10.28 | $1.26 | +6.82% |
Stock Comparison
NCKAF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BHPLF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BHPLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BHPLF's competition here
NCKAF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
NCKAF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 119.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while RTNTF trades at $71.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTNTF's competition here
NCKAF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while RTPPF trades at $62.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
NCKAF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while GMBXF trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check GMBXF's competition here
NCKAF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CYLYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CYLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYLYF's competition here
NCKAF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while GLCNF trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.94. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check GLCNF's competition here
NCKAF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while GLNCY trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.37. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check GLNCY's competition here
NCKAF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FSUMF trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check FSUMF's competition here
NCKAF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FSUGY trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check FSUGY's competition here
NCKAF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while NGLOY trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.10. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check NGLOY's competition here
NCKAF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CMCLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check CMCLF's competition here
NCKAF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AAUKF trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check AAUKF's competition here
NCKAF vs CNSUF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CNSUF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CNSUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CNSUF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CNSUF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CNSUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSUF's competition here
NCKAF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while TCKRF trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 100.76. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCKRF's competition here
NCKAF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and JXMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JXMNF's competition here
NCKAF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while IPOAF trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check IPOAF's competition here
NCKAF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while IVPAF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check IVPAF's competition here
NCKAF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
NCKAF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BDNNY trades at $66.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check BDNNY's competition here
NCKAF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while LYSDY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 324.33. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check LYSDY's competition here
NCKAF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while LYSCF trades at $8.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 321.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check LYSCF's competition here
NCKAF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SHTLF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
NCKAF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SMMYY trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 63.16. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check SMMYY's competition here
NCKAF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ABML's competition here
NCKAF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
NCKAF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PUTKY trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check PUTKY's competition here
NCKAF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
NCKAF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MALRY trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.89. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check MALRY's competition here
NCKAF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PILBF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check PILBF's competition here
NCKAF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
NCKAF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MALRF trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MALRF's competition here
NCKAF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
NCKAF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check FLMMF's competition here
NCKAF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while NGXXF trades at $15.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -43.42. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check NGXXF's competition here
NCKAF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while IPGDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
NCKAF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while IIDDY trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and IIDDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IIDDY's competition here
NCKAF vs PWCRF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PWCRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PWCRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PWCRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWCRF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PWCRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PWCRF's competition here
NCKAF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
NCKAF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PTNDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDY's competition here
NCKAF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while NICMF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
NCKAF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
NCKAF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
NCKAF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ILKAY trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ILKAY's competition here
NCKAF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and AFBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFBOF's competition here
NCKAF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ILKAF trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ILKAF's competition here
NCKAF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ERMAY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.90. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAY's competition here
NCKAF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SOUHY trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.23. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check SOUHY's competition here
NCKAF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ERMAF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and ERMAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERMAF's competition here
NCKAF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PTNDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTNDF's competition here
NCKAF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while LINRF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -56.82. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check LINRF's competition here
NCKAF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while DETRF trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DETRF's competition here
NCKAF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ADMLF trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.13. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ADMLF's competition here
NCKAF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ADTLF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADTLF's competition here
NCKAF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and TAOFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAOFF's competition here
NCKAF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
NCKAF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MFRVF's competition here
NCKAF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FMCXF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -98.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and FMCXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMCXF's competition here
NCKAF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 985.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AFMJF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check AFMJF's competition here
NCKAF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ATUSF trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ATUSF's competition here
NCKAF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 933.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AMVMF trades at $28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 90.38. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMVMF's competition here
NCKAF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
NCKAF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and STTSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STTSY's competition here
NCKAF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ALMTF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ALMTF's competition here
NCKAF vs GERFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GERFF has a market cap of 831.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while GERFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas GERFF's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GERFF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and GERFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GERFF's competition here
NCKAF vs BAJFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BAJFF has a market cap of 794.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BAJFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BAJFF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BAJFF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BAJFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BAJFF's competition here
NCKAF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BIRNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BIRNF's competition here
NCKAF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 690.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CREQF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -24.75. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check CREQF's competition here
NCKAF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CTJHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHF's competition here
NCKAF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 574.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while VULNF trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
NCKAF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 555.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SLGGF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check SLGGF's competition here
NCKAF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 541.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while REEMF trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check REEMF's competition here
NCKAF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 515.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MJDLF trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check MJDLF's competition here
NCKAF vs BLNMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLNMF has a market cap of 508M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BLNMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BLNMF's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLNMF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BLNMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLNMF's competition here
NCKAF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 503.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MNXMF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -77.07. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and MNXMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNXMF's competition here
NCKAF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and TTNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTNNF's competition here
NCKAF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PTTMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTTMF's competition here
NCKAF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and OSTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OSTTF's competition here
NCKAF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check MCRZF's competition here
NCKAF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 462.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PXMFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and PXMFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PXMFF's competition here
NCKAF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 449.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while PMETF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -138.60. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check PMETF's competition here
NCKAF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 448.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BQSSF trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check BQSSF's competition here
NCKAF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FGOVF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check FGOVF's competition here
NCKAF vs VTMLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and VTMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VTMLF's competition here
NCKAF vs LLLAF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 408.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while LLLAF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and LLLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLLAF's competition here
NCKAF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 404.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CGMLF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CGMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGMLF's competition here
NCKAF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 393.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while KMRPF trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and KMRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KMRPF's competition here
NCKAF vs BELMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BELMF has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BELMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BELMF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BELMF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BELMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BELMF's competition here
NCKAF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
NCKAF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while FWEDF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check FWEDF's competition here
NCKAF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check MLYF's competition here
NCKAF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 361M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ARAFF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -14.65. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ARAFF's competition here
NCKAF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTJHY's competition here
NCKAF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 349.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SVMLF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check SVMLF's competition here
NCKAF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 341.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and MCHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHHF's competition here
NCKAF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while MLXEF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.39. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check MLXEF's competition here
NCKAF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while SRHYY trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and SRHYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SRHYY's competition here
NCKAF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
NCKAF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
NCKAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCKAF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCKAF is priced at $0.08, while ERLFF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCKAF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.11, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -29.26. In terms of profitability, NCKAF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NCKAF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCKAF.Check ERLFF's competition here