thyssenkrupp nucera AG & Co. KGaA
thyssenkrupp nucera AG & Co. KGaA (NCH2.DE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NCH2.DE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCH2.DE | €8.15 | -1.93% | 1B | -162.90 | -€0.05 | N/A |
| LAR0.DE | €187.14 | +1.62% | 233.7B | 44.66 | €4.19 | +0.46% |
| SIE.DE | €220.35 | -1.94% | 172.6B | 21.97 | €10.03 | +2.43% |
| SND.DE | €248.05 | -2.63% | 139.5B | 31.12 | €7.97 | +1.57% |
| ENR.DE | €143.95 | -5.70% | 123.1B | 66.95 | €2.15 | +0.49% |
| ACO5.F | €13.93 | -3.53% | 67.8B | 27.31 | €0.51 | +1.00% |
| KC4.DE | €52.88 | +1.38% | 27.3B | 34.12 | €1.55 | +3.40% |
| XY6.DE | €104.35 | -0.33% | 25.4B | 30.87 | €3.38 | +1.34% |
| VWSB.DE | €21.24 | -0.93% | 21B | 27.58 | €0.77 | +0.35% |
| MTA.F | €0.00 | -100.00% | 19.1B | 30.66 | €1.06 | +0.68% |
Stock Comparison
NCH2.DE vs LAR0.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, LAR0.DE has a market cap of 233.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while LAR0.DE trades at €187.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas LAR0.DE's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAR0.DE's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to LAR0.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check LAR0.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SIE.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SIE.DE has a market cap of 172.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SIE.DE trades at €220.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SIE.DE's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SIE.DE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to SIE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SIE.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SND.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SND.DE has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SND.DE trades at €248.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SND.DE's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SND.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to SND.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SND.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs ENR.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ENR.DE has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while ENR.DE trades at €143.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas ENR.DE's P/E ratio is 66.95. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ENR.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to ENR.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check ENR.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs ACO5.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ACO5.F has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while ACO5.F trades at €13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas ACO5.F's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACO5.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to ACO5.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check ACO5.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs KC4.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, KC4.DE has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while KC4.DE trades at €52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas KC4.DE's P/E ratio is 34.12. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KC4.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to KC4.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check KC4.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs XY6.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, XY6.DE has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while XY6.DE trades at €104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas XY6.DE's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XY6.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to XY6.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check XY6.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs VWSB.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, VWSB.DE has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while VWSB.DE trades at €21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas VWSB.DE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VWSB.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to VWSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check VWSB.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs MTA.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, MTA.F has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while MTA.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas MTA.F's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTA.F's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NCH2.DE has daily volatility of 2.68 and MTA.F has daily volatility of N/A.Check MTA.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs NDX1.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, NDX1.DE has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while NDX1.DE trades at €43.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas NDX1.DE's P/E ratio is 94.09. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NDX1.DE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to NDX1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check NDX1.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs G1A.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, G1A.DE has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while G1A.DE trades at €62.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas G1A.DE's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to G1A.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to G1A.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check G1A.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs RAA.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, RAA.DE has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while RAA.DE trades at €663.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas RAA.DE's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAA.DE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to RAA.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check RAA.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs KRN.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, KRN.DE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while KRN.DE trades at €121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas KRN.DE's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRN.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to KRN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check KRN.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs JUN3.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, JUN3.DE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while JUN3.DE trades at €28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas JUN3.DE's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JUN3.DE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to JUN3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check JUN3.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs KSB.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, KSB.DE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while KSB.DE trades at €1,220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas KSB.DE's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KSB.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to KSB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check KSB.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs KSB3.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, KSB3.DE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while KSB3.DE trades at €1,150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas KSB3.DE's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KSB3.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to KSB3.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check KSB3.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs PFV.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, PFV.DE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while PFV.DE trades at €165.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas PFV.DE's P/E ratio is 52.01. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PFV.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to PFV.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check PFV.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs DEZ.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, DEZ.DE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while DEZ.DE trades at €9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas DEZ.DE's P/E ratio is 34.96. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DEZ.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to DEZ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check DEZ.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs DUE.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, DUE.DE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while DUE.DE trades at €19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas DUE.DE's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DUE.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to DUE.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check DUE.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs JST.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, JST.DE has a market cap of 902.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while JST.DE trades at €60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas JST.DE's P/E ratio is 28.58. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JST.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to JST.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check JST.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs MBH3.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, MBH3.F has a market cap of 762.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while MBH3.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas MBH3.F's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MBH3.F's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NCH2.DE has daily volatility of 2.68 and MBH3.F has daily volatility of N/A.Check MBH3.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs WSU.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, WSU.DE has a market cap of 653.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while WSU.DE trades at €48.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas WSU.DE's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WSU.DE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to WSU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check WSU.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs PO0.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, PO0.F has a market cap of 634.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while PO0.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas PO0.F's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PO0.F's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NCH2.DE has daily volatility of 2.68 and PO0.F has daily volatility of N/A.Check PO0.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs 2GB.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, 2GB.DE has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while 2GB.DE trades at €33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas 2GB.DE's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to 2GB.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to 2GB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check 2GB.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs AM3D.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, AM3D.DE has a market cap of 589.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while AM3D.DE trades at €18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas AM3D.DE's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AM3D.DE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to AM3D.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check AM3D.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs TPE.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, TPE.DE has a market cap of 548.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while TPE.DE trades at €26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas TPE.DE's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TPE.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to TPE.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check TPE.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs IJ8.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, IJ8.DE has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while IJ8.DE trades at €0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas IJ8.DE's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IJ8.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check IJ8.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs IJ8.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, IJ8.F has a market cap of 446.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while IJ8.F trades at €0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas IJ8.F's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IJ8.F's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to IJ8.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check IJ8.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs STM.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, STM.DE has a market cap of 401.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while STM.DE trades at €16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas STM.DE's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to STM.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to STM.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check STM.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs HDD.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, HDD.DE has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while HDD.DE trades at €1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas HDD.DE's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDD.DE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to HDD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check HDD.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs HG1.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, HG1.F has a market cap of 382.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while HG1.F trades at €24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas HG1.F's P/E ratio is 116.19. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HG1.F's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to HG1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check HG1.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs VQT.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, VQT.DE has a market cap of 370M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while VQT.DE trades at €25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas VQT.DE's P/E ratio is -15.89. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VQT.DE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to VQT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check VQT.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs D7G.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, D7G.F has a market cap of 349M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while D7G.F trades at €0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas D7G.F's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to D7G.F's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to D7G.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check D7G.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs S9I.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, S9I.DE has a market cap of 345.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while S9I.DE trades at €53.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas S9I.DE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to S9I.DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NCH2.DE has daily volatility of 2.68 and S9I.DE has daily volatility of N/A.Check S9I.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SEW.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SEW.DE has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SEW.DE trades at €12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SEW.DE's P/E ratio is -28.82. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEW.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SEW.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs F3C.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, F3C.DE has a market cap of 259.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while F3C.DE trades at €14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas F3C.DE's P/E ratio is 496.67. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to F3C.DE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to F3C.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check F3C.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SEW.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SEW.F has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SEW.F trades at €11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SEW.F's P/E ratio is -60.32. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SEW.F's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to SEW.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SEW.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs AVES.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, AVES.DE has a market cap of 196.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while AVES.DE trades at €15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas AVES.DE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVES.DE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to AVES.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check AVES.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs AAG.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, AAG.DE has a market cap of 188.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while AAG.DE trades at €13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas AAG.DE's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAG.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to AAG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check AAG.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs TTR1.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, TTR1.DE has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while TTR1.DE trades at €25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas TTR1.DE's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTR1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to TTR1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check TTR1.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs LPK.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, LPK.DE has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while LPK.DE trades at €6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas LPK.DE's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LPK.DE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to LPK.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check LPK.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs GSC1.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, GSC1.DE has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while GSC1.DE trades at €14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas GSC1.DE's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GSC1.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to GSC1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check GSC1.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs MXHN.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, MXHN.DE has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while MXHN.DE trades at €3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas MXHN.DE's P/E ratio is 181.00. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MXHN.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to MXHN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check MXHN.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SKB.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SKB.DE has a market cap of 142.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SKB.DE trades at €8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SKB.DE's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKB.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to SKB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SKB.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs DIS.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, DIS.DE has a market cap of 135.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while DIS.DE trades at €6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas DIS.DE's P/E ratio is 630.00. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIS.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to DIS.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check DIS.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SW1.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SW1.DE has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SW1.DE trades at €19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SW1.DE's P/E ratio is -197.92. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SW1.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to SW1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SW1.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs RSL2.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, RSL2.DE has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while RSL2.DE trades at €13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas RSL2.DE's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RSL2.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to RSL2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check RSL2.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs H2O.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, H2O.F has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while H2O.F trades at €1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas H2O.F's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to H2O.F's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check H2O.F's competition here
NCH2.DE vs H2O.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, H2O.DE has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while H2O.DE trades at €1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas H2O.DE's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to H2O.DE's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to H2O.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check H2O.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs DAR.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, DAR.DE has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while DAR.DE trades at €7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas DAR.DE's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DAR.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to DAR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check DAR.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs SNG.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, SNG.DE has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while SNG.DE trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas SNG.DE's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SNG.DE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to SNG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check SNG.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs GTQ1.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, GTQ1.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while GTQ1.DE trades at €18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas GTQ1.DE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GTQ1.DE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to GTQ1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check GTQ1.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs KU2.DE Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, KU2.DE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while KU2.DE trades at €84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas KU2.DE's P/E ratio is 56.38. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KU2.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is more volatile compared to KU2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check KU2.DE's competition here
NCH2.DE vs ACO1.F Comparison March 2026
NCH2.DE plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NCH2.DE stands at 1B. In comparison, ACO1.F has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NCH2.DE is priced at €8.15, while ACO1.F trades at €36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NCH2.DE currently has a P/E ratio of -162.90, whereas ACO1.F's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, NCH2.DE's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACO1.F's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NCH2.DE is less volatile compared to ACO1.F. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NCH2.DE.Check ACO1.F's competition here