N B Footwear Limited (NBFOOT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NBFOOT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBFOOT.BO | ₹8.26 | +9.84% | 106.5M | -65.75 | -₹0.12 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,004.50 | +2.77% | 272.7B | 66.48 | ₹15.05 | +0.55% |
| METROBRAND.BO | ₹1,004.05 | +2.58% | 272.6B | 66.23 | ₹15.10 | +0.55% |
| SAFARIND.BO | ₹1,915.30 | -0.29% | 91.1B | 1394.97 | ₹1.37 | N/A |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹680.30 | +3.41% | 86.3B | 64.39 | ₹10.43 | +1.34% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹679.50 | +3.31% | 85.8B | 50.49 | ₹13.25 | +1.34% |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹341.50 | +1.43% | 85.3B | 47.59 | ₹7.20 | +0.88% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹341.45 | +1.34% | 85.2B | 47.51 | ₹7.21 | +0.88% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,634.90 | +7.69% | 75.4B | 45.35 | ₹33.90 | +0.23% |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,636.00 | +7.80% | 75.2B | 44.82 | ₹34.25 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
NBFOOT.BO vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 272.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹1,004.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.48. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs METROBRAND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, METROBRAND.BO has a market cap of 272.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while METROBRAND.BO trades at ₹1,004.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas METROBRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.23. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to METROBRAND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check METROBRAND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SAFARIND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹680.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 64.39. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹679.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.49. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs RELAXO.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹341.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.59. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs RELAXO.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹341.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SAFARI.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,634.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SAFARI.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹135.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹135.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹238.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.43. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹237.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs VIPIND.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹322.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs VIPIND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹320.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs KARNIKA.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, KARNIKA.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while KARNIKA.NS trades at ₹136.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas KARNIKA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to KARNIKA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to KARNIKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check KARNIKA.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BIL.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BIL.BO trades at ₹710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.28. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BIL.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BIL.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BIL.NS trades at ₹708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.65. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BIL.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹710.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SREEL.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹199.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SREEL.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹197.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs LEHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹256.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs MANBRO.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 143.20. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹30.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is -740.00. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is -742.25. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹241.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹242.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs GRETEX.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, GRETEX.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while GRETEX.NS trades at ₹262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas GRETEX.NS's P/E ratio is 265.42. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to GRETEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to GRETEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check GRETEX.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹783.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 219.26. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹178.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 205.87. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CPS.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CPS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CPS.NS trades at ₹933.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CPS.NS's P/E ratio is 1215.19. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CPS.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹179.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 206.34. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹131.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs VIRAT.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹385.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.63. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs VANDANA.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs KHADIM.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹107.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 61.15. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs KHADIM.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹107.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 60.59. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹151.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹149.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 998.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹72.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹358.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 893.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CEENIK.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 742.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹185.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 676.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹100.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 675.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 662.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹101.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs ELAND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 623.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs AKI.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 501.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while AKI.NS trades at ₹4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check AKI.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs AKI.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while AKI.BO trades at ₹4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check AKI.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 348.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹82.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SIGNORIA.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SIGNORIA.NS has a market cap of 329M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SIGNORIA.NS trades at ₹72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SIGNORIA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SIGNORIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SIGNORIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SIGNORIA.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SPENTA.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹108.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is -22.03. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs VIVAA.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -55.68. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs JIWANRAM.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, JIWANRAM.NS has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while JIWANRAM.NS trades at ₹5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas JIWANRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to JIWANRAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to JIWANRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check JIWANRAM.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs WELTI.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -41.32. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs MISHDESIGN.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, MISHDESIGN.BO has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while MISHDESIGN.BO trades at ₹32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas MISHDESIGN.BO's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to MISHDESIGN.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to MISHDESIGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check MISHDESIGN.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs CBAZAAR.NS Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, CBAZAAR.NS has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while CBAZAAR.NS trades at ₹4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas CBAZAAR.NS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to CBAZAAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to CBAZAAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check CBAZAAR.NS's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs EUROLED.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 355.60. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs KARANWO.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is less volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs SRIND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
NBFOOT.BO vs AKM.BO Comparison June 2026
NBFOOT.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NBFOOT.BO stands at 106.5M. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NBFOOT.BO is priced at ₹8.26, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NBFOOT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -65.75, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBFOOT.BO's ROE is +108.84%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBFOOT.BO is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBFOOT.BO.Check AKM.BO's competition here