AKI India Limited (AKI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AKI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKI.NS | ₹4.87 | -1.02% | 506.7M | 25.84 | ₹0.19 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.BO | ₹1,037.55 | +0.26% | 283.6B | 68.80 | ₹15.08 | +0.53% |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,037.60 | +0.56% | 282.8B | 68.85 | ₹15.07 | +0.53% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹748.40 | -5.32% | 96.2B | 56.48 | ₹13.25 | +1.20% |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹747.70 | -5.34% | 96.1B | 71.55 | ₹10.45 | +1.20% |
| SAFARIND.BO | ₹1,915.30 | -0.29% | 91.1B | 1394.97 | ₹1.37 | N/A |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹355.85 | -3.26% | 89.1B | 49.79 | ₹7.19 | +0.84% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹356.05 | -3.30% | 88.9B | 49.38 | ₹7.21 | +0.84% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,675.60 | +0.99% | 82.3B | 48.88 | ₹34.28 | +0.21% |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,675.50 | +0.93% | 82.1B | 48.89 | ₹34.27 | +0.21% |
Stock Comparison
AKI.NS vs METROBRAND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, METROBRAND.BO has a market cap of 283.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while METROBRAND.BO trades at ₹1,037.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas METROBRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 68.80. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to METROBRAND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check METROBRAND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 282.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹1,037.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 68.85. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹748.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 56.48. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹747.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 71.55. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs SAFARIND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs RELAXO.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 89.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹355.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 49.79. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs RELAXO.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹356.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SAFARI.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,675.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 48.88. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SAFARI.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,675.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 48.89. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹134.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹237.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 48.26. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹237.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.19. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs VIPIND.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹317.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -13.35. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs VIPIND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹317.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -23.02. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs KARNIKA.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, KARNIKA.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while KARNIKA.NS trades at ₹133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KARNIKA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KARNIKA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to KARNIKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check KARNIKA.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BIL.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BIL.BO trades at ₹724.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BIL.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs BIL.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BIL.NS trades at ₹717.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BIL.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹730.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.14. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SREEL.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹217.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SREEL.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹214.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is -834.75. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹33.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is -835.25. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs LEHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹257.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹258.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹257.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs GRETEX.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, GRETEX.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while GRETEX.NS trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GRETEX.NS's P/E ratio is 276.04. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRETEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to GRETEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check GRETEX.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs MANBRO.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 112.88. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 213.26. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CPS.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CPS.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CPS.NS trades at ₹1,046.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CPS.NS's P/E ratio is 1324.05. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to CPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CPS.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹174.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 203.42. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 202.33. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs VIRAT.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹420.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 111.88. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs KHADIM.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹107.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 63.49. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs KHADIM.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹107.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 63.67. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs VANDANA.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 53.47. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹155.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 54.40. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹73.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 969.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹375.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 889.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹292.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CEENIK.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 732.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹182.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -7.79. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 687M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 671M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹101.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 655M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs ELAND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 643.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs AKI.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 520.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while AKI.BO trades at ₹4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check AKI.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹28.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs SIGNORIA.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SIGNORIA.NS has a market cap of 414.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SIGNORIA.NS trades at ₹87.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SIGNORIA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIGNORIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNORIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SIGNORIA.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 347.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹82.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SPENTA.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 291.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is -22.35. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs VIVAA.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 243.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹61.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -52.68. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs JIWANRAM.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, JIWANRAM.NS has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while JIWANRAM.NS trades at ₹6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas JIWANRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JIWANRAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to JIWANRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check JIWANRAM.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -68.58. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +108.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs WELTI.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -22.13. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs MISHDESIGN.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, MISHDESIGN.BO has a market cap of 105M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while MISHDESIGN.BO trades at ₹33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas MISHDESIGN.BO's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MISHDESIGN.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to MISHDESIGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check MISHDESIGN.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs CBAZAAR.NS Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, CBAZAAR.NS has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while CBAZAAR.NS trades at ₹4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas CBAZAAR.NS's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CBAZAAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to CBAZAAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check CBAZAAR.NS's competition here
AKI.NS vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹20.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs EUROLED.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 344.60. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 302.43. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs KARANWO.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹8.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs SRIND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is less volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
AKI.NS vs AKM.BO Comparison June 2026
AKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AKI.NS stands at 506.7M. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AKI.NS is priced at ₹4.87, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.84, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AKI.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AKI.NS is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AKI.NS.Check AKM.BO's competition here