Khadim India Limited (KHADIM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KHADIM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KHADIM.NS | ₹107.44 | +12.47% | 1.9B | 61.15 | ₹1.69 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,007.20 | +3.05% | 272.7B | 66.48 | ₹15.05 | +0.55% |
| METROBRAND.BO | ₹1,004.00 | +2.58% | 272.6B | 66.23 | ₹15.10 | +0.55% |
| SAFARIND.BO | ₹1,915.30 | -0.29% | 91.1B | 1394.97 | ₹1.37 | N/A |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹688.40 | +4.64% | 86.3B | 64.39 | ₹10.43 | +1.34% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹687.65 | +4.55% | 85.8B | 50.49 | ₹13.25 | +1.34% |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹345.85 | +2.72% | 85.3B | 47.59 | ₹7.20 | +0.88% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹345.20 | +2.45% | 85.2B | 47.51 | ₹7.21 | +0.88% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,634.00 | +7.63% | 75.4B | 45.35 | ₹33.90 | +0.23% |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,635.80 | +7.79% | 75.2B | 44.82 | ₹34.25 | +0.23% |
Stock Comparison
KHADIM.NS vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 272.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹1,007.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.48. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs METROBRAND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, METROBRAND.BO has a market cap of 272.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while METROBRAND.BO trades at ₹1,004.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas METROBRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.23. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to METROBRAND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check METROBRAND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SAFARIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAFARIND.BO has a market cap of 91.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SAFARIND.BO trades at ₹1,915.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SAFARIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1394.97. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAFARIND.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SAFARIND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹688.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 64.39. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹687.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.49. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs RELAXO.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 85.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹345.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 47.59. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs RELAXO.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹345.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 47.51. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SAFARI.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 45.35. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SAFARI.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,635.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.72. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹138.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 73.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹240.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.43. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 72.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹240.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 48.55. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs VIPIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIPIND.NS has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while VIPIND.NS trades at ₹324.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas VIPIND.NS's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIPIND.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check VIPIND.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs VIPIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹323.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -22.80. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs KARNIKA.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KARNIKA.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while KARNIKA.NS trades at ₹132.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas KARNIKA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KARNIKA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to KARNIKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check KARNIKA.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BIL.BO trades at ₹710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.28. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BIL.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BIL.NS trades at ₹709.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 68.65. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BIL.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹728.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.00. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SREEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹198.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SREEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹198.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs LEHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹258.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs MANBRO.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 143.20. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is -740.00. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹30.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is -742.25. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹243.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹243.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs GRETEX.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GRETEX.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while GRETEX.NS trades at ₹254.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas GRETEX.NS's P/E ratio is 265.42. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRETEX.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to GRETEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check GRETEX.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹789.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 219.26. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹180.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 205.87. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CPS.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CPS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CPS.NS trades at ₹955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CPS.NS's P/E ratio is 1215.19. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CPS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CPS.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹177.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 206.34. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹133.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs VIRAT.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹380.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.63. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs VANDANA.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs KHADIM.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹107.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 60.59. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹155.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 52.84. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹156.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 998.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 893.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CEENIK.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 742.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -7.89. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 676.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 675.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 662.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs ELAND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 623.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs AKI.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKI.NS has a market cap of 501.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while AKI.NS trades at ₹4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas AKI.NS's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKI.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to AKI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check AKI.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs AKI.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 500.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while AKI.BO trades at ₹4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check AKI.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 483.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 348.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹82.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SIGNORIA.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIGNORIA.NS has a market cap of 329M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SIGNORIA.NS trades at ₹72.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SIGNORIA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIGNORIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SIGNORIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SIGNORIA.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SPENTA.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹97.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is -22.03. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs VIVAA.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -55.68. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs JIWANRAM.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, JIWANRAM.NS has a market cap of 127.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while JIWANRAM.NS trades at ₹5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas JIWANRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JIWANRAM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to JIWANRAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check JIWANRAM.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 113M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs WELTI.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -41.32. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs MISHDESIGN.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MISHDESIGN.BO has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while MISHDESIGN.BO trades at ₹32.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas MISHDESIGN.BO's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MISHDESIGN.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to MISHDESIGN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check MISHDESIGN.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +108.84%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs CBAZAAR.NS Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CBAZAAR.NS has a market cap of 89M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while CBAZAAR.NS trades at ₹4.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas CBAZAAR.NS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBAZAAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to CBAZAAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check CBAZAAR.NS's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs EUROLED.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹17.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 355.60. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs KARANWO.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs SRIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is less volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
KHADIM.NS vs AKM.BO Comparison June 2026
KHADIM.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KHADIM.NS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KHADIM.NS is priced at ₹107.44, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KHADIM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 61.15, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KHADIM.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KHADIM.NS is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KHADIM.NS.Check AKM.BO's competition here