National Bank of Canada
National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA.TO | CA$143.40 | -0.51% | 56.2B | 13.71 | CA$10.46 | +3.18% |
| JPM.NE | CA$37.80 | -2.25% | 1.1T | 14.48 | CA$2.61 | +2.56% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$23.41 | -3.22% | 484.3B | 13.08 | CA$1.79 | +2.29% |
| RY.TO | CA$177.48 | -0.17% | 250.3B | 14.14 | CA$12.55 | +3.34% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +3.34% |
| TD.TO | CA$100.09 | -0.82% | 175.3B | 10.38 | CA$9.64 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.34 | -0.68% | 166.6B | 3.27 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +4.17% |
| BMO.TO | CA$152.92 | -0.01% | 110.4B | 14.20 | CA$10.77 | +4.55% |
Stock Comparison
NA.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while JPM.NE trades at CA$37.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
NA.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 484.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
NA.TO vs RY.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 250.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while RY.TO trades at CA$177.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is less volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while TD.TO trades at CA$100.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while BMO.TO trades at CA$152.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is less volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BNS.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, BNS.TO has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while BNS.TO trades at CA$76.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BNS.TO's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNS.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BNS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BNS.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while CM.TO trades at CA$99.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.75. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison August 2025
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 56.2B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$143.40, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 13.71, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here