National Bank of Canada
National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA.TO | CA$184.31 | +2.39% | 71.9B | 18.00 | CA$10.24 | +2.64% |
| JPM.NE | CA$37.92 | +0.16% | 1.1T | 14.04 | CA$2.70 | +1.98% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$24.89 | +1.63% | 477.4B | 12.96 | CA$1.92 | +2.23% |
| RY.TO | CA$226.93 | +0.91% | 316.9B | 15.60 | CA$14.55 | +2.74% |
| TD.TO | CA$131.31 | +1.07% | 219.1B | 10.64 | CA$12.34 | +3.22% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +2.74% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +3.22% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.36 | -0.04% | 166.7B | 3.27 | CA$8.05 | +3.22% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +3.22% |
| BMO.TO | CA$190.44 | +1.07% | 134.5B | 15.86 | CA$12.01 | +3.43% |
Stock Comparison
NA.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while JPM.NE trades at CA$37.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
NA.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 477.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$24.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
NA.TO vs RY.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 316.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while RY.TO trades at CA$226.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 219.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while TD.TO trades at CA$131.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 166.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 134.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while BMO.TO trades at CA$190.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 123.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while CM.TO trades at CA$133.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BNS.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BNS.TO has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while BNS.TO trades at CA$97.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BNS.TO's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BNS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BNS.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here
NA.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison April 2026
NA.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA.TO stands at 71.9B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA.TO is priced at CA$184.31, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.00, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here