The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BNS.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNS.TO | CA$123.02 | -0.37% | 150.8B | 16.97 | CA$7.25 | +3.55% |
| JPM.NE | CA$42.40 | -0.59% | 1.2T | 15.43 | CA$2.70 | +1.80% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$28.74 | +2.02% | 551.3B | 14.97 | CA$1.92 | +1.97% |
| RY.TO | CA$286.80 | +0.96% | 400.5B | 18.66 | CA$15.37 | +2.23% |
| CITI.TO | CA$59.57 | +0.12% | 325.9B | 16.73 | CA$3.56 | N/A |
| TD.TO | CA$169.25 | -0.05% | 279.6B | 19.87 | CA$8.52 | +2.52% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +2.23% |
| BMO.TO | CA$245.30 | +1.18% | 171.8B | 18.84 | CA$13.02 | +2.70% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +2.52% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.00 | +0.39% | 164.4B | 3.23 | CA$8.05 | +2.52% |
Stock Comparison
BNS.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while JPM.NE trades at CA$42.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 551.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 400.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while RY.TO trades at CA$286.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CITI.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, CITI.TO has a market cap of 325.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while CITI.TO trades at CA$59.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas CITI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CITI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CITI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CITI.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 279.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while TD.TO trades at CA$169.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 171.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while BMO.TO trades at CA$245.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while CM.TO trades at CA$161.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 85.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while NA.TO trades at CA$223.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here
BNS.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison June 2026
BNS.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNS.TO stands at 150.8B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BNS.TO is priced at CA$123.02, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.97, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BNS.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNS.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNS.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here