National Bank of Canada (NA-PE.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NA-PE.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA-PE.TO | CA$25.84 | +0.08% | 28B | 2.65 | CA$9.75 | +2.16% |
| JPM.NE | CA$42.79 | +0.92% | 1.2T | 15.85 | CA$2.70 | +1.77% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$29.04 | +1.04% | 557B | 15.13 | CA$1.92 | +1.95% |
| RY.TO | CA$288.41 | +0.56% | 402.7B | 18.76 | CA$15.37 | +2.21% |
| CITI.TO | CA$59.58 | +0.02% | 325.9B | 16.69 | CA$3.57 | N/A |
| TD.TO | CA$169.84 | +0.35% | 280.6B | 19.93 | CA$8.52 | +2.51% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +2.21% |
| BMO.TO | CA$246.16 | +0.35% | 172.4B | 18.89 | CA$13.03 | +2.68% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +2.51% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.04 | +0.15% | 164.7B | 3.23 | CA$8.05 | +2.51% |
Stock Comparison
NA-PE.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while JPM.NE trades at CA$42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 557B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$29.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs RY.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 402.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while RY.TO trades at CA$288.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs CITI.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, CITI.TO has a market cap of 325.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while CITI.TO trades at CA$59.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas CITI.TO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CITI.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to CITI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check CITI.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs TD.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 280.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while TD.TO trades at CA$169.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 172.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while BMO.TO trades at CA$246.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to BMO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check BMO.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 164.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs CM.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, CM.TO has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while CM.TO trades at CA$163.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas CM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to CM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check CM.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs BNS.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, BNS.TO has a market cap of 150.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while BNS.TO trades at CA$122.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas BNS.TO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNS.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to BNS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check BNS.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs NA.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 86.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while NA.TO trades at CA$224.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check NA.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is less volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here
NA-PE.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison June 2026
NA-PE.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NA-PE.TO stands at 28B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NA-PE.TO is priced at CA$25.84, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NA-PE.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.65, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NA-PE.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NA-PE.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NA-PE.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here