Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CM.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CM.TO | CA$150.26 | -0.46% | 139.5B | 15.70 | CA$9.59 | +2.71% |
| JPM.NE | CA$38.80 | -1.52% | 1.1T | 14.35 | CA$2.70 | +1.97% |
| BOFA.NE | CA$25.79 | -3.84% | 494.7B | 13.43 | CA$1.92 | +2.16% |
| RY.TO | CA$247.69 | +0.02% | 347.5B | 17.08 | CA$14.57 | +2.56% |
| TD.TO | CA$146.66 | -0.32% | 245.2B | 11.90 | CA$12.35 | +2.90% |
| RY-PZ.TO | CA$25.00 | +0.04% | 208.6B | 2.19 | CA$11.44 | +2.56% |
| TD-PFK.TO | CA$24.97 | -0.10% | 171.3B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +2.90% |
| TD-PFI.TO | CA$26.00 | -0.50% | 165.1B | 3.24 | CA$8.05 | +2.90% |
| BMO.TO | CA$208.90 | +0.29% | 147.8B | 17.44 | CA$12.00 | +3.16% |
| TD-PFL.TO | CA$24.99 | -0.04% | 135.5B | 3.10 | CA$8.05 | +2.90% |
Stock Comparison
CM.TO vs JPM.NE Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, JPM.NE has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while JPM.NE trades at CA$38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas JPM.NE's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JPM.NE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to JPM.NE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check JPM.NE's competition here
CM.TO vs BOFA.NE Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, BOFA.NE has a market cap of 494.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while BOFA.NE trades at CA$25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BOFA.NE's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOFA.NE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is less volatile compared to BOFA.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check BOFA.NE's competition here
CM.TO vs RY.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, RY.TO has a market cap of 347.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while RY.TO trades at CA$247.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RY.TO's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RY.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to RY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check RY.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs TD.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, TD.TO has a market cap of 245.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while TD.TO trades at CA$146.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TD.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to TD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check TD.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs RY-PZ.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, RY-PZ.TO has a market cap of 208.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while RY-PZ.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas RY-PZ.TO's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RY-PZ.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to RY-PZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check RY-PZ.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs TD-PFK.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, TD-PFK.TO has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while TD-PFK.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TD-PFK.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TD-PFK.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check TD-PFK.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs TD-PFI.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, TD-PFI.TO has a market cap of 165.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while TD-PFI.TO trades at CA$26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TD-PFI.TO's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TD-PFI.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check TD-PFI.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs BMO.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, BMO.TO has a market cap of 147.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while BMO.TO trades at CA$208.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BMO.TO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO and BMO.TO have similar daily volatility (0.83).Check BMO.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs TD-PFL.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, TD-PFL.TO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while TD-PFL.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TD-PFL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TD-PFL.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check TD-PFL.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs BNS.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, BNS.TO has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while BNS.TO trades at CA$105.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BNS.TO's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to BNS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check BNS.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs NA.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, NA.TO has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while NA.TO trades at CA$206.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NA.TO's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NA.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is less volatile compared to NA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check NA.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs NA-PE.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, NA-PE.TO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while NA-PE.TO trades at CA$25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NA-PE.TO's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NA-PE.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check NA-PE.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs NA-PC.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, NA-PC.TO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while NA-PC.TO trades at CA$26.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas NA-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NA-PC.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to NA-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check NA-PC.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs CM-PT.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, CM-PT.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while CM-PT.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CM-PT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CM-PT.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check CM-PT.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs TD-PFG.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, TD-PFG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while TD-PFG.TO trades at CA$25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas TD-PFG.TO's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TD-PFG.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to TD-PFG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check TD-PFG.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs CM-PR.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, CM-PR.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while CM-PR.TO trades at CA$24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas CM-PR.TO's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CM-PR.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to CM-PR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check CM-PR.TO's competition here
CM.TO vs BMO-PF.TO Comparison May 2026
CM.TO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CM.TO stands at 139.5B. In comparison, BMO-PF.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CM.TO is priced at CA$150.26, while BMO-PF.TO trades at CA$25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.70, whereas BMO-PF.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CM.TO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BMO-PF.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CM.TO is more volatile compared to BMO-PF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CM.TO.Check BMO-PF.TO's competition here