Khemani Distributors & Marketing Limited
Khemani Distributors & Marketing Limited (KDML.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDML.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDML.BO | ₹132.90 | +3.83% | 3.1B | 15.75 | ₹8.44 | N/A |
| ETERNAL.BO | ₹253.80 | -0.70% | 2.3T | 1103.48 | ₹0.23 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.NS | ₹215.19 | +0.00% | 2T | 286.92 | ₹0.75 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.BO | ₹215.25 | +0.00% | 2T | 377.63 | ₹0.57 | N/A |
| MEESHO.NS | ₹178.85 | -0.41% | 816.3B | -31.21 | -₹5.73 | N/A |
| NYKAA.BO | ₹270.40 | +0.41% | 774.2B | 540.80 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
| NYKAA.NS | ₹270.11 | +0.34% | 773.4B | 540.22 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.NS | ₹282.30 | -1.36% | 733B | -15.15 | -₹18.63 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.BO | ₹281.60 | -1.68% | 731.2B | -15.12 | -₹18.62 | N/A |
| REDTAPE.NS | ₹129.93 | -0.60% | 71.8B | 33.84 | ₹3.84 | +0.58% |
Stock Comparison
KDML.BO vs ETERNAL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ETERNAL.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ETERNAL.BO trades at ₹253.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ETERNAL.BO's P/E ratio is 1103.48. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ETERNAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ETERNAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ETERNAL.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs ZOMATO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZOMATO.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ZOMATO.NS trades at ₹215.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZOMATO.NS's P/E ratio is 286.92. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZOMATO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ZOMATO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ZOMATO.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs ZOMATO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ZOMATO.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ZOMATO.BO trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ZOMATO.BO's P/E ratio is 377.63. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZOMATO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ZOMATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ZOMATO.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs MEESHO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MEESHO.NS has a market cap of 816.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while MEESHO.NS trades at ₹178.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MEESHO.NS's P/E ratio is -31.21. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEESHO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to MEESHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check MEESHO.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs NYKAA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NYKAA.BO has a market cap of 774.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while NYKAA.BO trades at ₹270.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas NYKAA.BO's P/E ratio is 540.80. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NYKAA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to NYKAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check NYKAA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs NYKAA.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, NYKAA.NS has a market cap of 773.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while NYKAA.NS trades at ₹270.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas NYKAA.NS's P/E ratio is 540.22. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NYKAA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to NYKAA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check NYKAA.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs SWIGGY.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SWIGGY.NS has a market cap of 733B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while SWIGGY.NS trades at ₹282.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SWIGGY.NS's P/E ratio is -15.15. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWIGGY.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to SWIGGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check SWIGGY.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs SWIGGY.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SWIGGY.BO has a market cap of 731.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while SWIGGY.BO trades at ₹281.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SWIGGY.BO's P/E ratio is -15.12. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SWIGGY.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to SWIGGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check SWIGGY.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.84. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs AVL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AVL.NS has a market cap of 70.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while AVL.NS trades at ₹542.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AVL.NS's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AVL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to AVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check AVL.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs RTNINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RTNINDIA.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while RTNINDIA.BO trades at ₹36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RTNINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RTNINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check RTNINDIA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs EMIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EMIL.BO has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while EMIL.BO trades at ₹122.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas EMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.52. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to EMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check EMIL.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs EMIL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, EMIL.NS has a market cap of 47.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while EMIL.NS trades at ₹122.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas EMIL.NS's P/E ratio is 50.51. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to EMIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check EMIL.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs GARGI.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, GARGI.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while GARGI.BO trades at ₹876.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas GARGI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GARGI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to GARGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check GARGI.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs DENTALKART.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DENTALKART.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while DENTALKART.NS trades at ₹411.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DENTALKART.NS's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DENTALKART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to DENTALKART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check DENTALKART.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs LOGICA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LOGICA.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while LOGICA.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LOGICA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOGICA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to LOGICA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check LOGICA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs PANORAMA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while PANORAMA.BO trades at ₹42.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to PANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check PANORAMA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs LLOYDS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, LLOYDS.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while LLOYDS.NS trades at ₹95.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas LLOYDS.NS's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LLOYDS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO and LLOYDS.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LLOYDS.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs COMPEAU.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, COMPEAU.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while COMPEAU.BO trades at ₹363.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas COMPEAU.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COMPEAU.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to COMPEAU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check COMPEAU.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs AAYUSH.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, AAYUSH.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while AAYUSH.BO trades at ₹38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas AAYUSH.BO's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAYUSH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to AAYUSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check AAYUSH.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs PRAXIS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRAXIS.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while PRAXIS.BO trades at ₹8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PRAXIS.BO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAXIS.BO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check PRAXIS.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs PRAXIS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRAXIS.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while PRAXIS.NS trades at ₹8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PRAXIS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAXIS.NS's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check PRAXIS.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs WOMANCART.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, WOMANCART.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while WOMANCART.NS trades at ₹187.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas WOMANCART.NS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WOMANCART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to WOMANCART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check WOMANCART.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs ISFT.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ISFT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ISFT.BO trades at ₹74.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ISFT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISFT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ISFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ISFT.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs ISFT.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ISFT.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ISFT.NS trades at ₹74.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ISFT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ISFT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ISFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ISFT.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs KEMP.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, KEMP.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while KEMP.BO trades at ₹1,104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas KEMP.BO's P/E ratio is -75.74. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KEMP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO and KEMP.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KEMP.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs DIGIDRIVE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DIGIDRIVE.NS has a market cap of 922.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while DIGIDRIVE.NS trades at ₹23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DIGIDRIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check DIGIDRIVE.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs ARCHIES.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARCHIES.BO has a market cap of 498.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ARCHIES.BO trades at ₹14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ARCHIES.BO's P/E ratio is -47.61. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCHIES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ARCHIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ARCHIES.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs ARCHIES.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, ARCHIES.NS has a market cap of 497.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while ARCHIES.NS trades at ₹14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas ARCHIES.NS's P/E ratio is -44.64. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARCHIES.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to ARCHIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check ARCHIES.NS's competition here
KDML.BO vs PACE.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PACE.BO has a market cap of 404.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while PACE.BO trades at ₹17.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PACE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PACE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to PACE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check PACE.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs DUKEOFS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DUKEOFS.BO has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while DUKEOFS.BO trades at ₹18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DUKEOFS.BO's P/E ratio is -32.46. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DUKEOFS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to DUKEOFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check DUKEOFS.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs UHZAVERI.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, UHZAVERI.BO has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while UHZAVERI.BO trades at ₹14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas UHZAVERI.BO's P/E ratio is -372.50. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UHZAVERI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to UHZAVERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check UHZAVERI.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs DARSHANORNA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DARSHANORNA.BO has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while DARSHANORNA.BO trades at ₹2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DARSHANORNA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DARSHANORNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to DARSHANORNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check DARSHANORNA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs RAJPUTANA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, RAJPUTANA.BO has a market cap of 101.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while RAJPUTANA.BO trades at ₹33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas RAJPUTANA.BO's P/E ratio is 82.62. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAJPUTANA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to RAJPUTANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check RAJPUTANA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs DDIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, DDIL.BO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while DDIL.BO trades at ₹1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas DDIL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DDIL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to DDIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check DDIL.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs VEERKRUPA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, VEERKRUPA.BO has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while VEERKRUPA.BO trades at ₹0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas VEERKRUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VEERKRUPA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to VEERKRUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check VEERKRUPA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs HARIAEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, HARIAEXPO.BO has a market cap of 77.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while HARIAEXPO.BO trades at ₹6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas HARIAEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 55.83. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HARIAEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to HARIAEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check HARIAEXPO.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs MHSGRMS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, MHSGRMS.BO has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while MHSGRMS.BO trades at ₹5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas MHSGRMS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHSGRMS.BO's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to MHSGRMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check MHSGRMS.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs JSHL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, JSHL.BO has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while JSHL.BO trades at ₹6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas JSHL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSHL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to JSHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check JSHL.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs SPECTRA.BO Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, SPECTRA.BO has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while SPECTRA.BO trades at ₹5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas SPECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check SPECTRA.BO's competition here
KDML.BO vs PRAXIS-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDML.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDML.BO stands at 3.1B. In comparison, PRAXIS-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KDML.BO is priced at ₹132.90, while PRAXIS-RE.NS trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.75, whereas PRAXIS-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDML.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDML.BO is less volatile compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDML.BO.Check PRAXIS-RE.NS's competition here