Archies Limited
Archies Limited (ARCHIES.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARCHIES.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCHIES.NS | ₹14.49 | +1.40% | 489.5M | -43.91 | -₹0.33 | N/A |
| ETERNAL.BO | ₹255.60 | -0.45% | 2.3T | 1111.30 | ₹0.23 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.NS | ₹215.19 | +0.00% | 2T | 286.92 | ₹0.75 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.BO | ₹215.25 | +0.00% | 2T | 377.63 | ₹0.57 | N/A |
| MEESHO.NS | ₹179.59 | -0.61% | 819.7B | -31.34 | -₹5.73 | N/A |
| NYKAA.BO | ₹269.30 | +2.69% | 771.1B | 538.60 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
| NYKAA.NS | ₹269.19 | +2.44% | 770.8B | 538.38 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.BO | ₹286.40 | -0.93% | 743.6B | -15.37 | -₹18.63 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.NS | ₹286.20 | -0.31% | 743.1B | -15.36 | -₹18.63 | N/A |
| REDTAPE.NS | ₹130.72 | +2.78% | 72.3B | 34.04 | ₹3.84 | +0.57% |
Stock Comparison
ARCHIES.NS vs ETERNAL.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ETERNAL.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ETERNAL.BO trades at ₹255.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ETERNAL.BO's P/E ratio is 1111.30. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETERNAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ETERNAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ETERNAL.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs ZOMATO.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ZOMATO.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ZOMATO.NS trades at ₹215.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ZOMATO.NS's P/E ratio is 286.92. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZOMATO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ZOMATO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ZOMATO.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs ZOMATO.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ZOMATO.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ZOMATO.BO trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ZOMATO.BO's P/E ratio is 377.63. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZOMATO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ZOMATO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ZOMATO.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs MEESHO.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, MEESHO.NS has a market cap of 819.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while MEESHO.NS trades at ₹179.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas MEESHO.NS's P/E ratio is -31.34. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MEESHO.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to MEESHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check MEESHO.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs NYKAA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, NYKAA.BO has a market cap of 771.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while NYKAA.BO trades at ₹269.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas NYKAA.BO's P/E ratio is 538.60. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NYKAA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to NYKAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check NYKAA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs NYKAA.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, NYKAA.NS has a market cap of 770.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while NYKAA.NS trades at ₹269.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas NYKAA.NS's P/E ratio is 538.38. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NYKAA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to NYKAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check NYKAA.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs SWIGGY.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, SWIGGY.BO has a market cap of 743.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while SWIGGY.BO trades at ₹286.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas SWIGGY.BO's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWIGGY.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to SWIGGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check SWIGGY.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs SWIGGY.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, SWIGGY.NS has a market cap of 743.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while SWIGGY.NS trades at ₹286.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas SWIGGY.NS's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWIGGY.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to SWIGGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check SWIGGY.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹130.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs AVL.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, AVL.NS has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while AVL.NS trades at ₹517.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas AVL.NS's P/E ratio is 60.30. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to AVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check AVL.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs RTNINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, RTNINDIA.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while RTNINDIA.BO trades at ₹36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas RTNINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -12.13. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTNINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check RTNINDIA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs EMIL.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, EMIL.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while EMIL.NS trades at ₹110.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas EMIL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.48. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to EMIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check EMIL.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs EMIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, EMIL.BO has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while EMIL.BO trades at ₹110.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas EMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EMIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to EMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check EMIL.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs GARGI.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, GARGI.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while GARGI.BO trades at ₹861.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas GARGI.BO's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GARGI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to GARGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check GARGI.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs DENTALKART.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, DENTALKART.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while DENTALKART.NS trades at ₹391.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas DENTALKART.NS's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DENTALKART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to DENTALKART.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check DENTALKART.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs LOGICA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, LOGICA.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while LOGICA.BO trades at ₹190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas LOGICA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LOGICA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to LOGICA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check LOGICA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs PANORAMA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, PANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while PANORAMA.BO trades at ₹43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas PANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to PANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check PANORAMA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs KDML.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, KDML.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while KDML.BO trades at ₹132.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas KDML.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KDML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to KDML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check KDML.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs LLOYDS.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, LLOYDS.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while LLOYDS.NS trades at ₹96.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas LLOYDS.NS's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LLOYDS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check LLOYDS.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs COMPEAU.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, COMPEAU.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while COMPEAU.BO trades at ₹370.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas COMPEAU.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COMPEAU.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to COMPEAU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check COMPEAU.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs AAYUSH.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, AAYUSH.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while AAYUSH.BO trades at ₹39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas AAYUSH.BO's P/E ratio is 43.12. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAYUSH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to AAYUSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check AAYUSH.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs PRAXIS.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, PRAXIS.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while PRAXIS.BO trades at ₹7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas PRAXIS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRAXIS.BO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check PRAXIS.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs PRAXIS.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, PRAXIS.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while PRAXIS.NS trades at ₹7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas PRAXIS.NS's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRAXIS.NS's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check PRAXIS.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs WOMANCART.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, WOMANCART.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while WOMANCART.NS trades at ₹188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas WOMANCART.NS's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WOMANCART.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to WOMANCART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check WOMANCART.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs ISFT.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ISFT.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ISFT.NS trades at ₹75.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ISFT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISFT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ISFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ISFT.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs ISFT.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ISFT.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ISFT.BO trades at ₹75.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ISFT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISFT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ISFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ISFT.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs KEMP.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, KEMP.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while KEMP.BO trades at ₹1,104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas KEMP.BO's P/E ratio is -76.16. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KEMP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to KEMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check KEMP.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs DIGIDRIVE.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, DIGIDRIVE.NS has a market cap of 864M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while DIGIDRIVE.NS trades at ₹22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas DIGIDRIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check DIGIDRIVE.NS's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs ARCHIES.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, ARCHIES.BO has a market cap of 489.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while ARCHIES.BO trades at ₹14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas ARCHIES.BO's P/E ratio is -46.77. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARCHIES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to ARCHIES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check ARCHIES.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs PACE.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, PACE.BO has a market cap of 425.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while PACE.BO trades at ₹18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas PACE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PACE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to PACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check PACE.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs DUKEOFS.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, DUKEOFS.BO has a market cap of 189.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while DUKEOFS.BO trades at ₹19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas DUKEOFS.BO's P/E ratio is -33.81. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DUKEOFS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to DUKEOFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check DUKEOFS.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs UHZAVERI.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, UHZAVERI.BO has a market cap of 143.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while UHZAVERI.BO trades at ₹14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas UHZAVERI.BO's P/E ratio is -360.50. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UHZAVERI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to UHZAVERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check UHZAVERI.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs DARSHANORNA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, DARSHANORNA.BO has a market cap of 125.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while DARSHANORNA.BO trades at ₹2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas DARSHANORNA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DARSHANORNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to DARSHANORNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check DARSHANORNA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs RAJPUTANA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, RAJPUTANA.BO has a market cap of 104.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while RAJPUTANA.BO trades at ₹34.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas RAJPUTANA.BO's P/E ratio is 85.00. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAJPUTANA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to RAJPUTANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check RAJPUTANA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs DDIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, DDIL.BO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while DDIL.BO trades at ₹1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas DDIL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DDIL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to DDIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check DDIL.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs VEERKRUPA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, VEERKRUPA.BO has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while VEERKRUPA.BO trades at ₹0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas VEERKRUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VEERKRUPA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to VEERKRUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check VEERKRUPA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs HARIAEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, HARIAEXPO.BO has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while HARIAEXPO.BO trades at ₹6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas HARIAEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 50.92. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HARIAEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to HARIAEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check HARIAEXPO.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs MHSGRMS.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, MHSGRMS.BO has a market cap of 43.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while MHSGRMS.BO trades at ₹5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas MHSGRMS.BO's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MHSGRMS.BO's ROE of -2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to MHSGRMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check MHSGRMS.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs JSHL.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, JSHL.BO has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while JSHL.BO trades at ₹6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas JSHL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.06. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JSHL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to JSHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check JSHL.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs SPECTRA.BO Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, SPECTRA.BO has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while SPECTRA.BO trades at ₹5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas SPECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SPECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is more volatile compared to SPECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check SPECTRA.BO's competition here
ARCHIES.NS vs PRAXIS-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
ARCHIES.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARCHIES.NS stands at 489.5M. In comparison, PRAXIS-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARCHIES.NS is priced at ₹14.49, while PRAXIS-RE.NS trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARCHIES.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -43.91, whereas PRAXIS-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARCHIES.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARCHIES.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARCHIES.NS.Check PRAXIS-RE.NS's competition here