Mineros S.A.
Mineros S.A. MSA.TO Peers
See (MSA.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSA.TO | $2.42 | +0.83% | 725.36M | 4.84 | $0.50 | +5.77% |
| NGT.TO | $73.61 | +0.84% | 81.93B | 12.05 | $6.11 | +1.89% |
| AEM.TO | $161.48 | +1.59% | 81.63B | 24.62 | $6.56 | +1.00% |
| WPM.TO | $118.91 | +1.39% | 53.95B | 62.58 | $1.90 | +0.74% |
| ABX.TO | $26.18 | +1.12% | 45.02B | 14.23 | $1.84 | +2.13% |
| FNV.TO | $230.37 | +1.32% | 44.38B | 51.65 | $4.46 | +0.88% |
| K.TO | $20.19 | +0.40% | 24.77B | 14.85 | $1.36 | +0.83% |
| NCM.TO | $20.65 | +2.03% | 18.47B | 17.21 | $1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | $63.63 | +3.30% | 15.33B | 20.59 | $3.09 | +1.94% |
| AGI.TO | $36.06 | +1.21% | 15.17B | 41.93 | $0.86 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
MSA.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 81.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NGT.TO trades at $73.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 81.63B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AEM.TO trades at $161.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 53.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while WPM.TO trades at $118.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 45.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ABX.TO trades at $26.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.38B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while FNV.TO trades at $230.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.65. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs K.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 24.77B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while K.TO trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NCM.TO trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while LUG.TO trades at $63.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AGI.TO trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while EDV.TO trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -71.61. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while YRI.TO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while OR.TO trades at $34.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 145.33. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while BTO.TO trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.10. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.59B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ELD.TO trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while IMG.TO trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NGD.TO trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 23.62. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while OLA.TO trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 37.66. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.56B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while PRU.TO trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while OGC.TO trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while EQX.TO trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while TXG.TO trades at $44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SSL.TO trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 85.79. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while DPM.TO trades at $20.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.36B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while KNT.TO trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SSRM.TO trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3.05B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CEE.TO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while WDO.TO trades at $18.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.74B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CXB.TO trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while WGX.TO trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ORA.TO trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -16.15. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AAUC.TO trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -12.42. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CG.TO trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.24. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NG.TO trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -25.84. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while OSK.TO trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SEA.TO trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -111.93. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CNL.TO trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.99. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while RUP.TO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SBB.TO trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while KRR.TO trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 788.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GTWO.TO trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -82.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.92M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AR.TO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 636.86M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ORE.TO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 587.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while IAU.TO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 576.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ASE.CN trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 496.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GAU.TO trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 483.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while PRB.TO trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.81. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 479.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while MND.TO trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 475.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while FDR.V trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SGD.CN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while MOZ.TO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 280.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while JAG.TO trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -32.18. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 260.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SBI.TO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 249.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ITH.TO trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 227.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while STGO.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 212.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while VGZ.TO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 207.79M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GOLD.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 196.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while DNG.TO trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while FF.TO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 136.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while LGD.TO trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 132.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SANU.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -34.50. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.38M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while TNX.TO trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while COG.TO trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 109.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CBR.V trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 108.61M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GHRT.V trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 106.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NEXG.V trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 102.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while LN.TO trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 101.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while MAW.TO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 96.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ELO.TO trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 95.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while BSX.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 95.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while STLR.TO trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 93.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while XTG.TO trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs G.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 90.25M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while G.TO trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 79.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SIG.CN trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 69.94M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CCM.TO trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 66.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while BLLG.CN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while TML.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 63.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while HMR.V trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 61.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CGC.V trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 52.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while VEIN.V trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ME.TO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 49.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while ESM.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 44.91M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while USGD.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 38.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NHK.TO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while BNN.CN trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -11.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NVO.TO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while VLC.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while VGCX.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SGNL.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 29.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GTCH.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AMM.TO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.47M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while GRC.TO trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 21.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while VAU.V trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.14M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while PME.TO trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.36. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs CTOC.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while CTOC.CN trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs YRB.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, YRB.TO has a market cap of 18.46M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while YRB.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas YRB.TO's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to YRB.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to YRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 17.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while AUOZ.CN trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs SGLD.TO Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, SGLD.TO has a market cap of 17.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while SGLD.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas SGLD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGLD.TO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is less volatile compared to SGLD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 16.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while NOM.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.
MSA.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
MSA.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA.TO stands at 725.36M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 16.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA.TO is priced at $2.42, while HWG.CN trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.84, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MSA.TO's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA.TO is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.TO.