Mobiquity Technologies, Inc.
Mobiquity Technologies, Inc. MOBQW Peers
See (MOBQW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOBQW | $0.00 | +70.00% | 29.4K | N/A | -$4.76 | N/A |
| OMC | $71.22 | +0.75% | 13.9B | 9.73 | $7.32 | +3.95% |
| IPG | $24.24 | +0.54% | 9B | 18.53 | $1.31 | +5.46% |
| WPP | $34.75 | +0.99% | 7.6B | 10.37 | $3.35 | +7.18% |
| MGNI | $20.97 | +1.26% | 3B | 95.32 | $0.22 | N/A |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| IAS | $8.09 | +1.63% | 1.3B | 27.90 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZD | $31.31 | +0.06% | 1.3B | 17.89 | $1.75 | N/A |
| CRTO | $23.81 | -0.69% | 1.3B | 9.75 | $2.44 | N/A |
| STGW | $4.48 | +4.43% | 1.2B | -448.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MOBQW vs OMC Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while OMC trades at $71.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs IPG Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while IPG trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs WPP Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while WPP trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to WPP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MGNI Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MGNI trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 95.32. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MDCA Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs IAS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while IAS trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ZD Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ZD trades at $31.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CRTO Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CRTO trades at $23.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs STGW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while STGW trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is -448.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CMPR Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CMPR trades at $46.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs EEX Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 972.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while EEX trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is 489.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to EEX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs QNST Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 885.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while QNST trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is -1555.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to QNST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs BOMN Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to BOMN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs DLX Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 709.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while DLX trades at $15.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CCO Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CCO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CTV Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs NCMI Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 461.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while NCMI trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -25.74. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ADV Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 434.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ADV trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs BOC Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 429.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while BOC trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is 463.67. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to BOC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs QUOT Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TRMR Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 365.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs NEXN Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 329M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while NEXN trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ADTH Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ADTH's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs SDM Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while SDM trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 146.67. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to SDM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs EDHL Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while EDHL trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is 586.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to EDHL's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs WIMI Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 148.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while WIMI trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to WIMI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TZOO Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TZOO has a market cap of 146.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TZOO trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZOO's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TZOO's ROE of -8.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TZOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TSQ Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TSQ trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -7.58. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MCHX Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 94.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MCHX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CDLX Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CDLX trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ATY Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ICLK Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs STCN Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs INUV Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while INUV trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ABLV Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ABLV trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ABLV's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs XNET Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while XNET trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is -85.40. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to XNET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MCTR Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MCTR trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is 159.50. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MCTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ACCS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ACCS trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ADTHW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 42.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs GSMG Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs FLNT Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while FLNT trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MOXC Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MOBQ Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MOBQ trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -3.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs SWAG Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 28.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while SWAG trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to SWAG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs HHS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while HHS trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to HHS's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs STRN Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, STRN has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while STRN trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRN's P/E ratio is -446.67. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to STRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to STRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs HAO Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while HAO trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to HAO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs QMMM Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while QMMM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CHR Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CHR trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TNMG Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TNMG has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TNMG trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNMG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TNMG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TNMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ISIG Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs STFS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while STFS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is 95.10. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to STFS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs DRCT Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while DRCT trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs VSME Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while VSME trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs LDWY Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while LDWY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs DMS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to DMS's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs DRCTW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs BAOS Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while BAOS trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ADVWW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ADVWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs MGOL Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs CNET Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while CNET trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs STRNW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to STRNW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TRKAW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs ABLVW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 407K. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW and ABLVW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOBQW vs SRAX Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 326.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while SRAX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW and SRAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOBQW vs SWAGW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 256.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while SWAGW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW and SWAGW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOBQW vs GSMGW Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs DMS-WT Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW and DMS-WT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
MOBQW vs ZDVSV Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.
MOBQW vs TRKA Comparison
MOBQW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MOBQW stands at 29.4K. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MOBQW is priced at $0.00, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MOBQW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MOBQW's ROE is -3.64%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MOBQW is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MOBQW.