Metro Mining Limited
Metro Mining Limited (MMILF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MMILF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMILF | $0.04 | +0.00% | 243.9M | -4.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $27.40 | +8.53% | 139B | 12.23 | $2.24 | +4.94% |
| RTNTF | $74.71 | +0.00% | 105.3B | 11.90 | $6.28 | +3.15% |
| RTPPF | $58.71 | +0.19% | 99.9B | 9.35 | $6.28 | +6.86% |
| GLNCY | $7.93 | -0.63% | 49.1B | -30.42 | -$0.26 | +2.72% |
| GMBXF | $6.28 | -3.38% | 48.9B | 13.08 | $0.48 | +3.91% |
| GLCNF | $3.97 | -1.37% | 47.1B | -30.50 | -$0.13 | +2.91% |
| FSUMF | $12.01 | +2.21% | 36.9B | 9.53 | $1.26 | +7.47% |
| FSUGY | $23.06 | +1.59% | 35.5B | 9.12 | $2.53 | +8.06% |
| NGLOY | $13.71 | -2.77% | 31B | -9.52 | -$1.44 | +2.24% |
Stock Comparison
MMILF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BHPLF trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check BHPLF's competition here
MMILF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while RTNTF trades at $74.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check RTNTF's competition here
MMILF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 99.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while RTPPF trades at $58.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTPPF's competition here
MMILF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while GLNCY trades at $7.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -30.42. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check GLNCY's competition here
MMILF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while GMBXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check GMBXF's competition here
MMILF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while GLCNF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check GLCNF's competition here
MMILF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FSUMF trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and FSUMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSUMF's competition here
MMILF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FSUGY trades at $23.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check FSUGY's competition here
MMILF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NGLOY trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check NGLOY's competition here
MMILF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AAUKF trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and AAUKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAUKF's competition here
MMILF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CMCLF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check CMCLF's competition here
MMILF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while TCKRF trades at $32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 99.39. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and TCKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCKRF's competition here
MMILF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while IVPAF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check IVPAF's competition here
MMILF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while IPOAF trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check IPOAF's competition here
MMILF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BOLIF's competition here
MMILF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check JXMNF's competition here
MMILF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BDNNY trades at $61.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check BDNNY's competition here
MMILF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SHTLF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and SHTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHTLF's competition here
MMILF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ABML's competition here
MMILF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while LYSDY trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 177.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check LYSDY's competition here
MMILF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while LYSCF trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 175.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check LYSCF's competition here
MMILF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 57.50. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STMNF's competition here
MMILF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SMMYY trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.90. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check SMMYY's competition here
MMILF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKY trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PUTKY's competition here
MMILF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PUTKF's competition here
MMILF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NILSY's competition here
MMILF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and PAEKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PAEKY's competition here
MMILF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MALRY trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -4.71. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MALRY's competition here
MMILF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PILBF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -107.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PILBF's competition here
MMILF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MALRF trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MALRF's competition here
MMILF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NGXXF trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -51.57. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check NGXXF's competition here
MMILF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check FLMMF's competition here
MMILF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while IIDDY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check IIDDY's competition here
MMILF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHZQ's competition here
MMILF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while IPGDF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPGDF's competition here
MMILF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PTNDY's competition here
MMILF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MIMTF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and MIMTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MIMTF's competition here
MMILF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NICMF's competition here
MMILF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and DWMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DWMNF's competition here
MMILF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZZVF's competition here
MMILF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check AFBOF's competition here
MMILF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAF trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -16.34. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ERMAF's competition here
MMILF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SOUHY trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -35.88. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check SOUHY's competition here
MMILF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PTNDF's competition here
MMILF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ERMAY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 94.75. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ERMAY's competition here
MMILF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while DETRF trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check DETRF's competition here
MMILF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check TAOFF's competition here
MMILF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ILKAF's competition here
MMILF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ADTLF trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ADTLF's competition here
MMILF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ILKAY trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ILKAY's competition here
MMILF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ADMLF trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ADMLF's competition here
MMILF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while LINRF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -51.40. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check LINRF's competition here
MMILF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZRMF's competition here
MMILF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and MFRVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MFRVF's competition here
MMILF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 984.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ATUSF trades at $21.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ATUSF's competition here
MMILF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 970.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FMCXF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check FMCXF's competition here
MMILF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 919.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check STTSY's competition here
MMILF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AUSDF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and AUSDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUSDF's competition here
MMILF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 895.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AMVMF trades at $27.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 86.68. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check AMVMF's competition here
MMILF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ALMTF's competition here
MMILF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 858M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while AFMJF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check AFMJF's competition here
MMILF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check CTJHF's competition here
MMILF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and VULNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VULNF's competition here
MMILF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CREQF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check CREQF's competition here
MMILF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 552M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NCKAF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check NCKAF's competition here
MMILF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 519.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MJDLF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MJDLF's competition here
MMILF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 505.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while RTLGF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and RTLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RTLGF's competition here
MMILF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FGOVF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -94.80. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check FGOVF's competition here
MMILF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check TTNNF's competition here
MMILF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PTTMF's competition here
MMILF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check OSTTF's competition here
MMILF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 475.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while REEMF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -30.69. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check REEMF's competition here
MMILF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MCRZF's competition here
MMILF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 462.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MNXMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -70.75. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MNXMF's competition here
MMILF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 452.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BQSSF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check BQSSF's competition here
MMILF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 435.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PMETF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -89.43. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PMETF's competition here
MMILF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check BIRNF's competition here
MMILF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 429.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SLGGF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check SLGGF's competition here
MMILF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while KMRPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check KMRPF's competition here
MMILF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NQMIY's competition here
MMILF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MLYF's competition here
MMILF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 369.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CGMLF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check CGMLF's competition here
MMILF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 356.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while FWEDF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -11.38. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check FWEDF's competition here
MMILF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check CTJHY's competition here
MMILF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PXMFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PXMFF's competition here
MMILF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 344.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ERLFF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -33.24. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ERLFF's competition here
MMILF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 337.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MCHHF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MCHHF's competition here
MMILF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 328M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MLXEF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MLXEF's competition here
MMILF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SVMLF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check SVMLF's competition here
MMILF vs BSSMF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, BSSMF has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while BSSMF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas BSSMF's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to BSSMF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and BSSMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSSMF's competition here
MMILF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while SRHYY trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check SRHYY's competition here
MMILF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while PRMNF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -18.78. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check PRMNF's competition here
MMILF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ARAFF's competition here
MMILF vs LRSRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check LRSRF's competition here
MMILF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while MGMNF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check MGMNF's competition here
MMILF vs STQNF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STQNF's competition here
MMILF vs ERDCF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while ERDCF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -68.60. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check ERDCF's competition here
MMILF vs LTSRF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while LTSRF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check LTSRF's competition here
MMILF vs NTCPF Comparison August 2025
MMILF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMILF stands at 243.9M. In comparison, NTCPF has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MMILF is priced at $0.04, while NTCPF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMILF currently has a P/E ratio of -4.00, whereas NTCPF's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, MMILF's ROE is -2.12%, compared to NTCPF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MMILF is less volatile compared to NTCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMILF.Check NTCPF's competition here