McFarlane Lake Mining Limited
McFarlane Lake Mining Limited (MLM.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLM.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLM.NE | CA$0.07 | +16.67% | 18.9M | -7.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| NGT.TO | CA$86.54 | -1.03% | 96.8B | 12.10 | CA$7.28 | +1.59% |
| AEM.TO | CA$171.54 | +0.92% | 87.9B | 27.00 | CA$6.44 | +1.29% |
| WPM.TO | CA$126.63 | +0.52% | 58.4B | 69.14 | CA$1.86 | +0.70% |
| ABX.TO | CA$29.40 | +0.03% | 50.9B | 16.36 | CA$1.81 | +2.40% |
| FNV.TO | CA$219.11 | -0.64% | 43.1B | 51.78 | CA$4.32 | +0.92% |
| K.TO | CA$21.48 | -0.32% | 27.1B | 16.59 | CA$1.33 | +0.76% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$63.61 | -0.14% | 15.8B | 21.69 | CA$3.02 | +3.34% |
| AGI.TO | CA$35.59 | +2.33% | 14.9B | 41.67 | CA$0.85 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
MLM.NE vs NGT.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NGT.TO trades at CA$86.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AEM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AEM.TO trades at CA$171.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AEM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WPM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while WPM.TO trades at CA$126.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 69.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ABX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 50.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ABX.TO trades at CA$29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ABX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FNV.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while FNV.TO trades at CA$219.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.78. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FNV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs K.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, K.TO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while K.TO trades at CA$21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas K.TO's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to K.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to K.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check K.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NCM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs LUG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while LUG.TO trades at CA$63.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LUG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AGI.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AGI.TO trades at CA$35.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AGI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EDV.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -73.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EDV.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs YRI.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check YRI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OR.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while OR.TO trades at CA$38.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 166.74. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs EQX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while EQX.TO trades at CA$8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check EQX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BTO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while BTO.TO trades at CA$4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BTO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELD.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IMG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while IMG.TO trades at CA$9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IMG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NGD.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NGD.TO trades at CA$5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OGC.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while OGC.TO trades at CA$18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OGC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OLA.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while OLA.TO trades at CA$12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OLA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRU.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while PRU.TO trades at CA$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs DPM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while DPM.TO trades at CA$22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DPM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSL.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SSL.TO trades at CA$13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KNT.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while KNT.TO trades at CA$14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KNT.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TXG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while TXG.TO trades at CA$39.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TXG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SSRM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$16.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 30.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SSRM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CEE.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CEE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NG.TO trades at CA$7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of -14.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORA.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ORA.TO trades at CA$32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -18.98. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WDO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while WDO.TO trades at CA$16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WDO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CXB.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CXB.TO trades at CA$2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CXB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs WGX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check WGX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SEA.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SEA.TO trades at CA$21.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -145.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SEA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AAUC.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.89. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AAUC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 39.12. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs OSK.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check OSK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBB.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs KRR.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check KRR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs RUP.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while RUP.TO trades at CA$4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -163.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RUP.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs CNL.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CNL.TO trades at CA$12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -19.24. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CNL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ASE.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 821.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -9.11. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ASE.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs MSA.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 770.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MSA.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GTWO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 667.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -69.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTWO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AR.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs IAU.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 649.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ORE.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 590.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ORE.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GAU.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -21.22. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GAU.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs MND.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 482.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MND.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs PRB.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 459M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -14.06. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check PRB.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGD.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGD.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs MOZ.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MOZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FDR.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while FDR.V trades at CA$3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FDR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs ITH.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ITH.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs JAG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 306.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while JAG.TO trades at CA$3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -35.09. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check JAG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs STGO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 305.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STGO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SBI.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SBI.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GOLD.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 219M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GOLD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs DNG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check DNG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs FF.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check FF.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs VGZ.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 169.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGZ.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs LGD.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 166.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LGD.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs G.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while G.TO trades at CA$1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -16.70. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check G.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BSX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 140M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BSX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs TNX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TNX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ELO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ELO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs LN.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 115.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check LN.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs COG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check COG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NEXG.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NEXG.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs STLR.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check STLR.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SANU.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -24.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SANU.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs CBR.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 102.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CBR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs MAW.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check MAW.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs XTG.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check XTG.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GHRT.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GHRT.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs CCM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CCM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SIG.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SIG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs BLLG.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 67.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.67. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BLLG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs VEIN.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VEIN.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs HMR.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 65M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while HMR.V trades at CA$1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HMR.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs CGC.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of -19.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CGC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs TML.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check TML.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs ESM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ESM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs USGD.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check USGD.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs ME.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check ME.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs NOM.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NOM.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs NHK.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NHK.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs BNN.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check BNN.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs AMM.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AMM.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs AUOZ.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check AUOZ.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs NVO.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check NVO.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GTCH.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GTCH.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs VLC.V Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VLC.V's competition here
MLM.NE vs VGCX.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check VGCX.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs SGNL.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check SGNL.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs GRC.TO Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check GRC.TO's competition here
MLM.NE vs QIM.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check QIM.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs HWG.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check HWG.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs IRV.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, IRV.CN has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while IRV.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas IRV.CN's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to IRV.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to IRV.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check IRV.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs RISE.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check RISE.CN's competition here
MLM.NE vs CTOC.CN Comparison July 2025
MLM.NE plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLM.NE stands at 18.9M. In comparison, CTOC.CN has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLM.NE is priced at CA$0.07, while CTOC.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLM.NE currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CTOC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, MLM.NE's ROE is +18.13%, compared to CTOC.CN's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MLM.NE is more volatile compared to CTOC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLM.NE.Check CTOC.CN's competition here