Markforged Holding Corporation
Markforged Holding Corporation (MKFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKFG | $4.74 | -0.42% | 98.3M | -1.12 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| ANET | $117.55 | +2.86% | 147.6B | 49.59 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $133.86 | +2.01% | 90.9B | 20.99 | $6.38 | +1.46% |
| SMCI | $60.05 | +10.24% | 35.8B | 32.64 | $1.84 | N/A |
| STX | $150.46 | -0.28% | 31.9B | 21.62 | $6.96 | +1.90% |
| HPQ | $25.85 | +0.67% | 24.3B | 9.94 | $2.60 | +4.43% |
| WDC | $68.99 | +0.24% | 24.1B | 23.63 | $2.92 | +0.14% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $106.91 | +1.88% | 21.4B | 18.86 | $5.67 | +1.94% |
| PSTG | $59.40 | +3.14% | 19.4B | 156.42 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKFG vs ANET Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 147.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ANET trades at $117.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ANET's competition here
MKFG vs DELL Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DELL trades at $133.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DELL's competition here
MKFG vs SMCI Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SMCI trades at $60.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SMCI's competition here
MKFG vs STX Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while STX trades at $150.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check STX's competition here
MKFG vs HPQ Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while HPQ trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check HPQ's competition here
MKFG vs WDC Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while WDC trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check WDC's competition here
MKFG vs CAJ Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CAJ's competition here
MKFG vs NTAP Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while NTAP trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check NTAP's competition here
MKFG vs PSTG Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while PSTG trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 156.42. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check PSTG's competition here
MKFG vs LOGI Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while LOGI trades at $94.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check LOGI's competition here
MKFG vs IONQ Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while IONQ trades at $42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -28.04. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check IONQ's competition here
MKFG vs IONQ-WT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while IONQ-WT trades at $31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
MKFG vs SNDKV Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SNDKV's competition here
MKFG vs QBTS Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QBTS trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -27.81. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QBTS's competition here
MKFG vs QBTS-WT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QBTS-WT trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
MKFG vs RGTIW Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RGTIW trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RGTIW's competition here
MKFG vs RGTI Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RGTI trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -19.46. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RGTI's competition here
MKFG vs QUBT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QUBT trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QUBT's competition here
MKFG vs CRCT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CRCT trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CRCT's competition here
MKFG vs MKFG-WT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
MKFG vs CRSR Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 999M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CRSR trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CRSR's competition here
MKFG vs SSYS Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 935.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SSYS trades at $11.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SSYS's competition here
MKFG vs RCAT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 890.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RCAT trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -17.75. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RCAT's competition here
MKFG vs NNDM Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 312.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while NNDM trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check NNDM's competition here
MKFG vs DDD Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 242.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DDD trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DDD's competition here
MKFG vs CAN Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 210.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CAN trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CAN's competition here
MKFG vs TIO Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check TIO's competition here
MKFG vs DM Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DM's competition here
MKFG vs MICT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check MICT's competition here
MKFG vs OSS Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while OSS trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check OSS's competition here
MKFG vs INVE Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while INVE trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check INVE's competition here
MKFG vs ALOT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ALOT trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ALOT's competition here
MKFG vs YIBO Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while YIBO trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check YIBO's competition here
MKFG vs ZSPC Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ZSPC trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ZSPC's competition here
MKFG vs STRC Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check STRC's competition here
MKFG vs QMCO Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 54M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QMCO trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QMCO's competition here
MKFG vs TACT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while TACT trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check TACT's competition here
MKFG vs FATH Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check FATH's competition here
MKFG vs UAVS Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while UAVS trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check UAVS's competition here
MKFG vs KTCC Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while KTCC trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.03. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check KTCC's competition here
MKFG vs EBON Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while EBON trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check EBON's competition here
MKFG vs SGE Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SGE's competition here
MKFG vs VLD Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VLD's competition here
MKFG vs SCKT Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SCKT trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SCKT's competition here
MKFG vs VJET Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VJET's competition here
MKFG vs STRCW Comparison July 2025
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.80%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check STRCW's competition here