Markforged Holding Corporation
Markforged Holding Corporation (MKFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKFG | $4.74 | -0.42% | 98.3M | -1.12 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| ANET | $133.57 | -0.34% | 168.1B | 49.09 | $2.72 | N/A |
| DELL | $151.62 | +1.14% | 101.6B | 17.46 | $8.68 | +1.39% |
| WDC | $272.29 | +4.25% | 92.3B | 25.71 | $10.59 | +0.16% |
| STX | $383.71 | +2.60% | 83.7B | 43.31 | $8.86 | +0.75% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | +4.11% |
| PSTG | $61.50 | +0.82% | 20.3B | 111.80 | $0.55 | N/A |
| NTAP | $98.66 | +1.78% | 19.5B | 16.55 | $5.96 | +2.11% |
| SMCI | $30.75 | -0.49% | 18.4B | 22.45 | $1.37 | N/A |
| HPQ | $18.93 | -0.11% | 17.4B | 7.17 | $2.64 | +6.25% |
Stock Comparison
MKFG vs ANET Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ANET trades at $133.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 49.09. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ANET's competition here
MKFG vs DELL Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DELL trades at $151.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DELL's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DELL's competition here
MKFG vs WDC Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 92.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while WDC trades at $272.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check WDC's competition here
MKFG vs STX Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 83.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while STX trades at $383.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STX's ROE of -8.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check STX's competition here
MKFG vs CAJ Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CAJ's competition here
MKFG vs PSTG Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while PSTG trades at $61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 111.80. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check PSTG's competition here
MKFG vs NTAP Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while NTAP trades at $98.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check NTAP's competition here
MKFG vs SMCI Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SMCI trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SMCI's competition here
MKFG vs HPQ Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while HPQ trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HPQ's ROE of +11.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check HPQ's competition here
MKFG vs LOGI Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while LOGI trades at $92.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check LOGI's competition here
MKFG vs IONQ Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while IONQ trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check IONQ's competition here
MKFG vs IONQ-WT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while IONQ-WT trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check IONQ-WT's competition here
MKFG vs QBTS-WT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QBTS-WT trades at $21.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QBTS-WT's competition here
MKFG vs SNDKV Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SNDKV's competition here
MKFG vs QBTS Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QBTS trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QBTS's competition here
MKFG vs RGTI Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RGTI trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RGTI's competition here
MKFG vs RGTIW Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RGTIW trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RGTIW's competition here
MKFG vs INFQ Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, INFQ has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while INFQ trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas INFQ's P/E ratio is -77.73. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to INFQ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to INFQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check INFQ's competition here
MKFG vs RCAT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while RCAT trades at $15.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -28.32. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check RCAT's competition here
MKFG vs MKFG-WT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check MKFG-WT's competition here
MKFG vs QUBT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 996.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QUBT trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -66.39. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QUBT's competition here
MKFG vs CRCT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 861.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CRCT trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CRCT's competition here
MKFG vs SSYS Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 672.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SSYS trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SSYS's competition here
MKFG vs CRSR Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 567.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CRSR trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -44.33. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CRSR's competition here
MKFG vs NNDM Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while NNDM trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -5.27. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check NNDM's competition here
MKFG vs BGIN Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, BGIN has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while BGIN trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas BGIN's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BGIN's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to BGIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check BGIN's competition here
MKFG vs DDD Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DDD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DDD's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DDD's competition here
MKFG vs VELO Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VELO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VELO trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VELO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VELO's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VELO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VELO's competition here
MKFG vs OSS Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while OSS trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check OSS's competition here
MKFG vs CAN Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 231.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while CAN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check CAN's competition here
MKFG vs AMCI Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, AMCI has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while AMCI trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas AMCI's P/E ratio is -795.00. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AMCI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to AMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check AMCI's competition here
MKFG vs VTIX Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VTIX has a market cap of 178.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VTIX trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VTIX's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VTIX's ROE of +6.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VTIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VTIX's competition here
MKFG vs TIO Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check TIO's competition here
MKFG vs DM Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to DM's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check DM's competition here
MKFG vs MICT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check MICT's competition here
MKFG vs INVE Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while INVE trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to INVE's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check INVE's competition here
MKFG vs ALOT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ALOT trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ALOT's competition here
MKFG vs YIBO Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while YIBO trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to YIBO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check YIBO's competition here
MKFG vs UAVS Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while UAVS trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check UAVS's competition here
MKFG vs TACT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while TACT trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check TACT's competition here
MKFG vs FATH Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check FATH's competition here
MKFG vs QMCO Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while QMCO trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check QMCO's competition here
MKFG vs KTCC Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while KTCC trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check KTCC's competition here
MKFG vs EBON Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while EBON trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check EBON's competition here
MKFG vs SGE Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SGE's competition here
MKFG vs VLD Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VLD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VLD's competition here
MKFG vs SCKT Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while SCKT trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check SCKT's competition here
MKFG vs VJET Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check VJET's competition here
MKFG vs ZSPC Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while ZSPC trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check ZSPC's competition here
MKFG vs STRCW Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check STRCW's competition here
MKFG vs HILL Comparison March 2026
MKFG plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKFG stands at 98.3M. In comparison, HILL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKFG is priced at $4.74, while HILL trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKFG currently has a P/E ratio of -1.12, whereas HILL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKFG's ROE is -0.38%, compared to HILL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MKFG is more volatile compared to HILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKFG.Check HILL's competition here