MICT, Inc.
MICT, Inc. MICT Peers
See (MICT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MICT | $0.93 | +2.90% | 118.01M | -2.99 | -$0.31 | N/A |
ANET | $96.71 | +0.30% | 121.46B | 40.81 | $2.37 | N/A |
DELL | $114.32 | +0.11% | 79.78B | 17.92 | $6.38 | +1.63% |
HPQ | $29.12 | -0.68% | 27.45B | 10.47 | $2.78 | +3.90% |
SMCI | $45.00 | +15.71% | 26.86B | 24.46 | $1.84 | N/A |
STX | $109.04 | +1.16% | 23.14B | 15.69 | $6.95 | +2.61% |
CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 21.97B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
NTAP | $101.53 | +0.99% | 20.95B | 18.80 | $5.40 | +2.05% |
PSTG | $56.27 | -0.51% | 18.41B | 181.52 | $0.31 | N/A |
WDC | $50.72 | +1.46% | 17.70B | 17.37 | $2.92 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MICT vs ANET Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 121.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while ANET trades at $96.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs DELL Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 79.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while DELL trades at $114.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs HPQ Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 27.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while HPQ trades at $29.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs SMCI Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while SMCI trades at $45.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs STX Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 23.14B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while STX trades at $109.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs CAJ Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 21.97B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs NTAP Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 20.95B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while NTAP trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.80. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs PSTG Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.41B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while PSTG trades at $56.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 181.52. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs WDC Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 17.70B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while WDC trades at $50.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs LOGI Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while LOGI trades at $86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs IONQ Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while IONQ trades at $35.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -23.23. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs IONQ-WT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while IONQ-WT trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs SNDKV Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs QBTS-WT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 4.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while QBTS-WT trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs QBTS Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while QBTS trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs RGTI Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while RGTI trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -15.06. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs RGTIW Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while RGTIW trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.16. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs QUBT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while QUBT trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -21.91. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs CRCT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while CRCT trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs MKFG-WT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs CRSR Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 919.58M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while CRSR trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs SSYS Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 800.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while SSYS trades at $11.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs RCAT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 625.50M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while RCAT trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs NNDM Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 341.13M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while NNDM trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs CAN Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 235.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while CAN trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs DDD Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 231.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while DDD trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs TIO Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.95M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs DM Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs ZSPC Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 148.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while ZSPC trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs MKFG Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs QMCO Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 89.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while QMCO trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs INVE Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 80.77M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while INVE trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs YIBO Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 77.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while YIBO trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs ALOT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 68.44M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while ALOT trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs STRC Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to STRC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs OSS Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 52.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while OSS trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs TACT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 39.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while TACT trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs FATH Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs KTCC Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 29.81M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while KTCC trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs EBON Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 25.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while EBON trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs UAVS Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 12.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while UAVS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs SGE Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs VLD Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs SCKT Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9.19M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while SCKT trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs VJET Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.85M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.
MICT vs STRCW Comparison
MICT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICT stands at 118.01M. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MICT is priced at $0.93, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.99, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MICT's ROE is -40.50%, compared to STRCW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MICT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICT.