Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms, Inc. META Peers
See (META) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $643.58 | +0.20% | 1.6T | 25.18 | $25.56 | +0.31% |
| GOOGL | $172.33 | -0.33% | 2.1T | 19.23 | $8.96 | +0.46% |
| GOOG | $173.38 | -0.34% | 2.1T | 19.37 | $8.95 | +0.46% |
| SPOT | $663.97 | +1.62% | 133.4B | 104.73 | $6.34 | N/A |
| DASH | $206.59 | +0.83% | 87.5B | 258.24 | $0.80 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $83.20 | -0.86% | 28.5B | 8.25 | $10.08 | N/A |
| TME | $17.87 | -0.25% | 27.3B | 20.53 | $0.87 | +1.78% |
| PINS | $31.43 | -0.18% | 21.3B | 11.56 | $2.72 | N/A |
| RDDT | $105.50 | +0.84% | 19.5B | 21.14 | $4.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
META vs GOOGL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GOOGL trades at $172.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GOOG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GOOG trades at $173.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SPOT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SPOT trades at $663.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 104.73. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DASH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while DASH trades at $206.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 258.24. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWTR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BIDU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while BIDU trades at $83.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TME Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TME trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PINS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while PINS trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RDDT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while RDDT trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWLO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TWLO trades at $117.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -512.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ZG trades at $66.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -189.20. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs Z Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while Z trades at $67.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -192.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YNDX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SNAP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SNAP trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.08. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NBIS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while NBIS trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -23.13. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MTCH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while MTCH trades at $30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while DJT trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJTWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while DJTWW trades at $13.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -30.88. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IACVV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CARG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while CARG trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.12. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IAC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while IAC trades at $36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YELP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while YELP trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GENI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GENI trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -52.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs WB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while WB trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DOYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while DOYU trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while NN trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGIV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TBLA trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.25. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FVRR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while FVRR trades at $32.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 68.17. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GRPN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GRPN trades at $28.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -28.91. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLAW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 970.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TBLAW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MOMO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while MOMO trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EVER Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 840.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while EVER trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OPRA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while OPRA trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 760.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ANGI trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ATHM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ATHM trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GETY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GETY trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MAX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 701M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while MAX trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NNAVW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 672.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while NNAVW trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SSTK Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 637M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SSTK trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SMWB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 622M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SMWB trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -34.14. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs THRY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 592.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while THRY trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KIND Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 585.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while KIND trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TTGT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 509.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TTGT trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PERI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 484.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while PERI trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -59.78. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs UPXI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while UPXI trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 325.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ZH trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -126.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRVG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 292.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TRVG trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 264M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while OB trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEAT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SEAT trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AREN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 223.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while AREN trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRUE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 143.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TRUE trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JOYY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 124.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while JOYY trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -19.44. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ASST Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 112M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ASST trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLRW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ILLRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ILLR trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JFIN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while JFIN trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BZFD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 79.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while BZFD trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CCG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 67.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while CCG trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GIFT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GIFT trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IZEA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while IZEA trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PODC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while PODC trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EGLX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZDGE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ZDGE trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while MNY trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEATW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SEATW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while BODI trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SCOR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SCOR trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LYL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HRYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LIZI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LKCO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KRKR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while KRKR trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NAMI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while NAMI trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFYW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LCFYW trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -85.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs QTT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LOV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while LCFY trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SLE trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ONFO trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ROI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CRTD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while CRTD trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CMCM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while CMCM trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNYWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs STBX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZEW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFOW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 615.3K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while ONFOW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLGG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FENG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 231.7K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while FENG trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SOGP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 30.6K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while SOGP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 17.1K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9.7K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while TC trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROMW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AUTO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.6T. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $643.58, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 25.18, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.