Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms, Inc. META Peers
See (META) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
META vs GOOG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.00T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GOOG trades at $166.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GOOGL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.00T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GOOGL trades at $164.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TCEHY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TCEHY has a market cap of 580.35B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TCEHY trades at $63.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TCEHY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TCEHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TCEHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TCTZF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TCTZF has a market cap of 577.59B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TCTZF trades at $63.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TCTZF's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TCTZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TCTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SPOT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 128.01B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SPOT trades at $637.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 100.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PROSY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PROSY has a market cap of 109.37B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PROSY trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PROSY's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PROSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PROSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PROSF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PROSF has a market cap of 108.65B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PROSF trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PROSF's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PROSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PROSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DASH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 87.09B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DASH trades at $205.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 708.69. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NAPRF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NAPRF has a market cap of 45.01B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NAPRF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NAPRF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAPRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to NAPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NPSNY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NPSNY has a market cap of 44.62B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NPSNY trades at $54.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NPSNY's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NPSNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to NPSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWTR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BIDU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 31.11B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BIDU trades at $90.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KSHTY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KSHTY has a market cap of 29.18B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KSHTY trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KSHTY's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KSHTY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to KSHTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BAIDF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BAIDF has a market cap of 27.35B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BAIDF trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BAIDF's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BAIDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BAIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KUASF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KUASF has a market cap of 25.88B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KUASF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KUASF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KUASF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to KUASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YAHOF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YAHOF has a market cap of 25.64B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YAHOF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YAHOF's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YAHOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YAHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RPGRY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RPGRY has a market cap of 21.45B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RPGRY trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RPGRY's P/E ratio is 54.12. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RPGRY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to RPGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RDDT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 21.04B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RDDT trades at $116.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RPGRF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RPGRF has a market cap of 19.67B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RPGRF trades at $149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RPGRF's P/E ratio is 49.83. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RPGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RPGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PINS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 18.62B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PINS trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NHNCF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NHNCF has a market cap of 17.13B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NHNCF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NHNCF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NHNCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to NHNCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.40B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZG trades at $66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -139.54. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs Z Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.38B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while Z trades at $68.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -141.94. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWLO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 15.79B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TWLO trades at $103.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -447.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YNDX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SNAP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14.27B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SNAP trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -27.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ADEVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ADEVF has a market cap of 13.10B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ADEVF trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ADEVF's P/E ratio is -80.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ADEVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ADEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ADEVY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ADEVY has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ADEVY trades at $4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ADEVY's P/E ratio is -66.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ADEVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ADEVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TME Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 10.65B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TME trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ATDRF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ATDRF has a market cap of 10.53B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ATDRF trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ATDRF's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATDRF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ATDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ATDRY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ATDRY has a market cap of 10.16B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ATDRY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ATDRY's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATDRY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ATDRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CSXXY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CSXXY has a market cap of 8.17B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CSXXY trades at $43.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CSXXY's P/E ratio is 49.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CSXXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CSXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RTMVY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RTMVY has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RTMVY trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RTMVY's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RTMVY's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RTMVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MTCH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.47B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MTCH trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -5.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RTMVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RTMVF has a market cap of 6.90B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RTMVF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RTMVF's P/E ratio is 27.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RTMVF's ROE of +2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to RTMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NBIS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 5.60B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NBIS trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -14.17. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.35B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DJT trades at $24.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is -10.28. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SKLTF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SKLTF has a market cap of 4.69B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SKLTF trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SKLTF's P/E ratio is -119.73. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SKLTF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SKLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJTWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DJTWW trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -33.92. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CHLLF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CHLLF has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CHLLF trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CHLLF's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CHLLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CHLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KKKUF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KKKUF has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KKKUF trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KKKUF's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KKKUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to KKKUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IACVV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HMNTY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, HMNTY has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while HMNTY trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas HMNTY's P/E ratio is 62.22. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HMNTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to HMNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OOOOF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, OOOOF has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while OOOOF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas OOOOF's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OOOOF's ROE of +12.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OOOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CARG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 2.92B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CARG trades at $28.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 140.05. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MEIUF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MEIUF has a market cap of 2.84B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MEIUF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MEIUF's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MEIUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MEIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IAC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.83B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while IAC trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GENI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.64B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GENI trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -40.74. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DOYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.29B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DOYU trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YELP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YELP trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs WB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while WB trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NN trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.49. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NN's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DHGAF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DHGAF has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DHGAF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DHGAF's P/E ratio is 50.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DHGAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DHGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGIV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.06B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TBLA trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is -311.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLAW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 997.72M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TBLAW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EVER Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 952.36M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while EVER trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MOMO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 944.73M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MOMO trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FVRR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 944.23M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FVRR trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GETY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 812.36M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GETY trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GETY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ATHM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 804.61M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ATHM trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OPRA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 778.66M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while OPRA trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NNAVW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 684.51M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NNAVW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GRPN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 668.03M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GRPN trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MAX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 660.87M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MAX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SMWB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 624.53M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SMWB trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -53.86. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SSTK Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 618.70M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SSTK trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs THRY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 604.80M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while THRY trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TTGT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 583.78M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TTGT trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KIND Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 575.13M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KIND trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 536.56M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ANGI trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MLRYY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MLRYY has a market cap of 523.96M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MLRYY trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MLRYY's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MLRYY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MLRYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs XINXF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, XINXF has a market cap of 431.65M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while XINXF trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas XINXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to XINXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to XINXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PERI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 420.65M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PERI trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 37.36. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PERI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PTOVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PTOVF has a market cap of 397.05M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PTOVF trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PTOVF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PTOVF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PTOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ADBMF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ADBMF has a market cap of 371.69M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ADBMF trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ADBMF's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ADBMF's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ADBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEAT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 365.85M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SEAT trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is 46.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEAT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRVG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 352.94M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TRVG trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 350.92M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZH trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs WNWSF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, WNWSF has a market cap of 334.25M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while WNWSF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas WNWSF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WNWSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to WNWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 324.38M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while OB trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -31.27. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZGXNF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZGXNF has a market cap of 312.33M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZGXNF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZGXNF's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZGXNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZGXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AREN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 249.70M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while AREN trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AREN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FRRGF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FRRGF has a market cap of 238.54M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FRRGF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FRRGF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FRRGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to FRRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs VYGPF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, VYGPF has a market cap of 232.01M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while VYGPF trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas VYGPF's P/E ratio is 458.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VYGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to VYGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLRW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 219.18M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ILLRW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 210.42M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ILLR trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MECVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MECVF has a market cap of 186.88M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MECVF trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MECVF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MECVF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MECVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs UUMMF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, UUMMF has a market cap of 152.87M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while UUMMF trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas UUMMF's P/E ratio is 40.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UUMMF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to UUMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRUE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 129.52M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TRUE trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OPNDF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, OPNDF has a market cap of 129.33M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while OPNDF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas OPNDF's P/E ratio is -69.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPNDF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OPNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TGRVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TGRVF has a market cap of 120.72M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TGRVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TGRVF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TGRVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NXCLF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NXCLF has a market cap of 112.76M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NXCLF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NXCLF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NXCLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NXCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JOYY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 108.64M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while JOYY trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CKPDY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CKPDY has a market cap of 93.57M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CKPDY trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CKPDY's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CKPDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CKPDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CPADF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CPADF has a market cap of 89.11M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CPADF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CPADF's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CPADF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CPADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RSTN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RSTN has a market cap of 84.21M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RSTN trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RSTN's P/E ratio is -10.16. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RSTN's ROE of +52.37%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RSTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JFIN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 81.94M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while JFIN trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BZFD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 76.97M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BZFD trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BZFD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MSEZ Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MSEZ has a market cap of 76.95M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MSEZ trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MSEZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MSEZ's ROE of +9.87%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MSEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CCG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 69.18M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CCG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZMDTF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZMDTF has a market cap of 52.56M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZMDTF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZMDTF's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZMDTF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZMDTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BBUZ Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BBUZ has a market cap of 49.99M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BBUZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BBUZ's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BBUZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BBUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GIFT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 48.83M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GIFT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PODC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 44.56M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PODC trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -11.93. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SABOF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SABOF has a market cap of 42.21M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SABOF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SABOF's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SABOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SABOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EGLX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEATW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 32.78M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SEATW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEATW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IZEA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 32.39M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while IZEA trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 31.70M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MNY trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZDGE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 31.49M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZDGE trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RDLYF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RDLYF has a market cap of 30.21M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RDLYF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RDLYF's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RDLYF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to RDLYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 28.35M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BODI trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SCOR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.74M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SCOR trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.43M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs UPXI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 16.08M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while UPXI trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LYL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.54M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HRYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LIZI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PXSTF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PXSTF has a market cap of 14.11M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PXSTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PXSTF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PXSTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PXSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NAMI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 11.12M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NAMI trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LKCO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PRSNF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PRSNF has a market cap of 10.55M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PRSNF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PRSNF's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PRSNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PRSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KRKR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 9.44M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KRKR trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFYW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 9.07M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LCFYW trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -86.88. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ASST Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 8.74M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ASST trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NIROF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NIROF has a market cap of 8.05M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NIROF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NIROF's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NIROF's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NIROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EGLXF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, EGLXF has a market cap of 7.00M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while EGLXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas EGLXF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGLXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to EGLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HYPPF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, HYPPF has a market cap of 6.56M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while HYPPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas HYPPF's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HYPPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to HYPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.54M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LCFY trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SFUNY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SFUNY has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SFUNY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SFUNY's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFUNY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SFUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BBTVF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BBTVF has a market cap of 5.99M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BBTVF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BBTVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BBTVF's ROE of -6.85%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BBTVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NUGL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NUGL has a market cap of 5.70M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NUGL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NUGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NUGL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NUGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs QTT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LOV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.49M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ONFO trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BMTM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BMTM has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BMTM trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BMTM's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BMTM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SLE trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLE's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ROI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROI's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CRTD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CRTD trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CRTDW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CRTDW has a market cap of 3.46M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CRTDW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CRTDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRTDW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CRTDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YOOIF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YOOIF has a market cap of 2.50M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YOOIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YOOIF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YOOIF's ROE of -7.73%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YOOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CMCM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CMCM trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LBUY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LBUY has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LBUY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LBUY's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LBUY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GIFX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GIFX has a market cap of 2.00M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GIFX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GIFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GIFX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MRNJ Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MRNJ has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MRNJ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MRNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MRNJ's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MRNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNYWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.40M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GOGY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GOGY has a market cap of 1.39M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GOGY trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GOGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOGY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GOGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs STBX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZEW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFOW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 974205.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ONFOW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs QQQFF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, QQQFF has a market cap of 954290.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while QQQFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas QQQFF's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QQQFF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QQQFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs APMLF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, APMLF has a market cap of 923633.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while APMLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas APMLF's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to APMLF's ROE of +36.79%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to APMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTCP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LTCP has a market cap of 915649.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LTCP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LTCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LTCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SPFYF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SPFYF has a market cap of 818255.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SPFYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SPFYF's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPFYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SPFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs VMSI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, VMSI has a market cap of 810248.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while VMSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas VMSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to VMSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to VMSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MRPT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MRPT has a market cap of 752549.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MRPT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MRPT's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MRPT's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MRPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CYAP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CYAP has a market cap of 598145.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CYAP trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CYAP's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CYAP's ROE of -3.76%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CYAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DATI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DATI has a market cap of 541852.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DATI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DATI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DATI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILIM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ILIM has a market cap of 513204.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ILIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ILIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RBDC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RBDC has a market cap of 505234.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RBDC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RBDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RBDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LKST Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LKST has a market cap of 406000.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LKST trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LKST's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LKST's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LKST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs QTTOY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, QTTOY has a market cap of 363703.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while QTTOY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas QTTOY's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QTTOY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QTTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLGG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FENG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 241304.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FENG trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZONX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZONX has a market cap of 150957.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZONX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZONX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZONX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ZONX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEEK Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SEEK has a market cap of 144758.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SEEK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SEEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEEK's ROE of +3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KIWB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, KIWB has a market cap of 137699.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while KIWB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas KIWB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KIWB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KIWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DGTHF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DGTHF has a market cap of 137639.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DGTHF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DGTHF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DGTHF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DGTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OTTV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, OTTV has a market cap of 47642.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while OTTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas OTTV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OTTV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to OTTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LHGI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LHGI has a market cap of 41164.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LHGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LHGI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SOGP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32015.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SOGP trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLNM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SLNM has a market cap of 31594.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SLNM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SLNM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLNM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HUTN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, HUTN has a market cap of 26800.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while HUTN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas HUTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HUTN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to HUTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ROII Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ROII has a market cap of 16333.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ROII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ROII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROII's ROE of +2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ROII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs REDFY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, REDFY has a market cap of 10771.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while REDFY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas REDFY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to REDFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to REDFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RWRDP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RWRDP has a market cap of 10000.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RWRDP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RWRDP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RWRDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to RWRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DELCF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, DELCF has a market cap of 8803.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while DELCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas DELCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DELCF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DELCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8119.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 6790.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while TC trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BTIM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BTIM has a market cap of 6044.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BTIM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BTIM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BTIM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PIKL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PIKL has a market cap of 5710.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PIKL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PIKL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PIKL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PIKL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ISHM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ISHM has a market cap of 5249.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ISHM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ISHM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ISHM's ROE of -9.54%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ISHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SHGY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SHGY has a market cap of 5000.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SHGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SHGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SHGY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MDAW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, MDAW has a market cap of 4960.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while MDAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas MDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MDAW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LOCM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LOCM has a market cap of 4863.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LOCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LOCM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LOCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FMHS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FMHS has a market cap of 3465.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FMHS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FMHS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FMHS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FMHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROMW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LOVLQ Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, LOVLQ has a market cap of 2625.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while LOVLQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas LOVLQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOVLQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LOVLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZZLL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ZZLL has a market cap of 2028.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ZZLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ZZLL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZZLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZZLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FRFR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FRFR has a market cap of 1695.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FRFR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FRFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FRFR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FRFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs INTH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, INTH has a market cap of 1648.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while INTH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas INTH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to INTH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to INTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ABBY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, ABBY has a market cap of 1198.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while ABBY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas ABBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ABBY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ABBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RAIO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, RAIO has a market cap of 891.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while RAIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas RAIO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RAIO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RAIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YITD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, YITD has a market cap of 800.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while YITD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas YITD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YITD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YITD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CYZN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, CYZN has a market cap of 279.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while CYZN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas CYZN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CYZN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AUCM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, AUCM has a market cap of 10.00. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while AUCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas AUCM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AUCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to AUCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SOGO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SOGO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FRFRD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, FRFRD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while FRFRD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas FRFRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FRFRD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to FRFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SFUN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, SFUN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while SFUN trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas SFUN's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SFUN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SFUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PCOM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, PCOM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while PCOM trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AUTO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, AUTO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BLCT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, BLCT comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NEAPF Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.51T. In comparison, NEAPF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $599.27, while NEAPF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 23.45, whereas NEAPF's P/E ratio is -45.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NEAPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to NEAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOG | $166.05 | +0.14% | 2.00T | 18.55 | $8.95 | +0.49% |
| GOOGL | $164.21 | +0.11% | 2.00T | 18.33 | $8.96 | +0.49% |
| META | $599.27 | +0.38% | 1.51T | 23.45 | $25.55 | +0.34% |
| TCEHY | $63.63 | -0.50% | 580.35B | 22.56 | $2.82 | +0.68% |
| TCTZF | $63.33 | -1.66% | 577.59B | 22.54 | $2.81 | +0.69% |
| SPOT | $637.14 | -1.06% | 128.01B | 100.97 | $6.31 | N/A |
| PROSY | $9.70 | -0.71% | 109.37B | 15.40 | $0.63 | +0.23% |
| PROSF | $49.70 | +27.86% | 108.65B | 15.68 | $3.17 | +0.22% |
| DASH | $205.52 | +0.21% | 87.09B | 708.69 | $0.29 | N/A |
| NAPRF | $275.00 | +8.70% | 45.01B | 14.95 | $18.40 | +0.24% |