Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms, Inc. META Peers
See (META) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $697.23 | -0.70% | 1.8T | 27.22 | $25.61 | +0.29% |
| GOOGL | $175.95 | -0.46% | 2.1T | 19.64 | $8.96 | +0.46% |
| GOOG | $177.23 | -0.40% | 2.1T | 19.76 | $8.97 | +0.46% |
| SPOT | $721.28 | +0.80% | 144.9B | 111.48 | $6.47 | N/A |
| DASH | $219.39 | -1.06% | 93B | 277.71 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $86.01 | -1.42% | 29.9B | 8.52 | $10.10 | N/A |
| TME | $18.20 | -3.53% | 28.5B | 21.41 | $0.85 | +0.99% |
| RDDT | $133.85 | +6.06% | 24.7B | 26.82 | $4.99 | N/A |
| PINS | $34.53 | -1.96% | 23.4B | 12.69 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
META vs GOOGL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GOOGL trades at $175.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GOOG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GOOG trades at $177.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SPOT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 144.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SPOT trades at $721.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 111.48. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DASH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 93B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while DASH trades at $219.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 277.71. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWTR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BIDU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while BIDU trades at $86.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TME Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TME trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs RDDT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while RDDT trades at $133.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PINS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while PINS trades at $34.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TWLO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TWLO trades at $116.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -505.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs Z Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while Z trades at $67.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -193.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ZG trades at $66.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -189.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YNDX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SNAP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SNAP trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.40. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NBIS Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while NBIS trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -29.27. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MTCH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while MTCH trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJTWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while DJTWW trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DJT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while DJT trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IACVV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CARG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while CARG trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 84.27. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IAC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while IAC trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs WB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while WB trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GENI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GENI trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -50.68. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YELP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while YELP trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs YY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs DOYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while DOYU trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while NN trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.20. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GRPN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GRPN trades at $36.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -36.03. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MOMO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while MOMO trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGIV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLAW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TBLA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TBLA trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 92.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FVRR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while FVRR trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 61.38. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JFIN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 914.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while JFIN trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EVER Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 887.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while EVER trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OPRA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 826.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while OPRA trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NNAVW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 785.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while NNAVW trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ATHM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 771.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ATHM trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MAX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 732M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while MAX trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ANGI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 729.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ANGI trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GETY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GETY trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SSTK Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 627.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SSTK trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SMWB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SMWB trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -34.43. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KIND Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while KIND trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs THRY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while THRY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TTGT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 476.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TTGT trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PERI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 435.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while PERI trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -53.72. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs UPXI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 363.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while UPXI trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZH Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 342.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ZH trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRVG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TRVG trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs OB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEAT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SEAT trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -64.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs AREN Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 248.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while AREN trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TRUE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TRUE trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs JOYY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while JOYY trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -19.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 117.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ILLR trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ILLRW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ASST Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ASST trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BZFD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while BZFD trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CCG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while CCG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ZDGE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ZDGE trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -29.62. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs PODC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while PODC trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs IZEA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while IZEA trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GIFT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GIFT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs EGLX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while MNY trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs NAMI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while NAMI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs BODI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while BODI trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SCOR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SCOR trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPB Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LTRPA Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SEATW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SEATW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFYW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LCFYW trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -153.90. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LYL Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs HRYU Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SOGP Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SOGP trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LIZI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LKCO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs KRKR Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while KRKR trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs QTT Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LOV Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ONFO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs LCFY Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while LCFY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ROI Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLE Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SLE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CRTD Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while CRTD trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs CMCM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while CMCM trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs TC Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while TC trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs MNYWW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while MNYWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs STBX Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FAZEW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs ONFOW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 564K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while ONFOW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SLGG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs FENG Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 231.2K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while FENG trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROM Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs GROMW Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.
META vs SOGO Comparison
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.8T. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $697.23, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 27.22, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.