Meta Platforms, Inc.
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (META) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | $773.44 | +11.25% | 1.9T | 28.09 | $27.53 | +0.26% |
| GOOG | $192.86 | -2.32% | 2.3T | 20.56 | $9.38 | +0.42% |
| GOOGL | $191.90 | -2.36% | 2.3T | 20.48 | $9.37 | +0.42% |
| SPOT | $626.54 | -3.68% | 127.2B | 139.48 | $4.49 | N/A |
| DASH | $250.25 | +0.91% | 106.1B | 316.77 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| TME | $20.99 | -0.52% | 33.3B | 24.70 | $0.85 | +0.86% |
| BIDU | $87.87 | +2.25% | 30.9B | 8.65 | $10.16 | N/A |
| RDDT | $160.59 | +7.54% | 29.7B | 32.29 | $4.99 | N/A |
| PINS | $38.60 | +0.78% | 26.1B | 14.19 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
META vs GOOG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GOOG trades at $192.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GOOG's competition here
META vs GOOGL Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GOOGL trades at $191.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GOOGL's competition here
META vs SPOT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SPOT trades at $626.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 139.48. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SPOT's competition here
META vs DASH Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while DASH trades at $250.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 316.77. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check DASH's competition here
META vs TWTR Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TWTR's competition here
META vs TME Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TME trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TME's competition here
META vs BIDU Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while BIDU trades at $87.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check BIDU's competition here
META vs RDDT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while RDDT trades at $160.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check RDDT's competition here
META vs PINS Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while PINS trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check PINS's competition here
META vs TWLO Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TWLO trades at $129.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -560.91. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TWLO's competition here
META vs Z Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while Z trades at $79.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -227.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check Z's competition here
META vs ZG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ZG trades at $76.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -219.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ZG's competition here
META vs SNAP Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SNAP trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SNAP's competition here
META vs YNDX Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check YNDX's competition here
META vs NBIS Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while NBIS trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -32.79. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check NBIS's competition here
META vs MTCH Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while MTCH trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check MTCH's competition here
META vs DJTWW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while DJTWW trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -24.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check DJTWW's competition here
META vs DJT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while DJT trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check DJT's competition here
META vs IACVV Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check IACVV's competition here
META vs CARG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while CARG trades at $32.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 88.70. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check CARG's competition here
META vs IAC Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while IAC trades at $39.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check IAC's competition here
META vs GENI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GENI trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -59.26. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GENI's competition here
META vs DOYU Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while DOYU trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check DOYU's competition here
META vs JOYY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while JOYY trades at $50.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check JOYY's competition here
META vs WB Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while WB trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check WB's competition here
META vs YELP Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while YELP trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check YELP's competition here
META vs YY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check YY's competition here
META vs NN Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while NN trades at $14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check NN's competition here
META vs ANGIV Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ANGIV's competition here
META vs MOMO Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while MOMO trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check MOMO's competition here
META vs GRPN Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GRPN trades at $30.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -30.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GRPN's competition here
META vs TBLA Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TBLA trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 80.25. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TBLA's competition here
META vs EVER Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while EVER trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check EVER's competition here
META vs TBLAW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 823.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TBLAW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TBLAW's competition here
META vs ATHM Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ATHM trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ATHM's competition here
META vs NNAVW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while NNAVW trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check NNAVW's competition here
META vs FVRR Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 793.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while FVRR trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check FVRR's competition here
META vs ANGI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 778.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ANGI trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ANGI's competition here
META vs OPRA Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 741.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while OPRA trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check OPRA's competition here
META vs GETY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 732.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GETY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GETY's competition here
META vs KIND Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while KIND trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check KIND's competition here
META vs JFIN Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 711.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while JFIN trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check JFIN's competition here
META vs SMWB Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SMWB trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -38.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SMWB's competition here
META vs SSTK Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 680.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SSTK trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SSTK's competition here
META vs MAX Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while MAX trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check MAX's competition here
META vs THRY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while THRY trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check THRY's competition here
META vs TTGT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 517.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TTGT trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TTGT's competition here
META vs PERI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 487.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while PERI trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -60.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check PERI's competition here
META vs ZH Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ZH trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -140.83. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ZH's competition here
META vs AREN Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 290.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while AREN trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check AREN's competition here
META vs TRVG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TRVG trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TRVG's competition here
META vs OB Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check OB's competition here
META vs UPXI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while UPXI trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check UPXI's competition here
META vs SEAT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SEAT trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SEAT's competition here
META vs TRUE Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TRUE trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TRUE's competition here
META vs ILLRW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ILLRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ILLRW's competition here
META vs ILLR Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ILLR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ILLR's competition here
META vs BZFD Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while BZFD trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check BZFD's competition here
META vs MNY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while MNY trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check MNY's competition here
META vs IZEA Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while IZEA trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check IZEA's competition here
META vs CCG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while CCG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check CCG's competition here
META vs BODY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check BODY's competition here
META vs ZDGE Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ZDGE trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -31.12. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ZDGE's competition here
META vs ASST Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ASST trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ASST's competition here
META vs PODC Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while PODC trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check PODC's competition here
META vs EGLX Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check EGLX's competition here
META vs GIFT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GIFT trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GIFT's competition here
META vs BODI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while BODI trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check BODI's competition here
META vs SCOR Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SCOR trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SCOR's competition here
META vs NAMI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while NAMI trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check NAMI's competition here
META vs SOGP Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SOGP trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SOGP's competition here
META vs LTRPB Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LTRPB's competition here
META vs LTRPA Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LTRPA's competition here
META vs SEATW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SEATW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SEATW's competition here
META vs LYL Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LYL's competition here
META vs HRYU Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check HRYU's competition here
META vs LIZI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LIZI's competition here
META vs LCFYW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LCFYW trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -136.36. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LCFYW's competition here
META vs FAZEW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check FAZEW's competition here
META vs FAZE Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check FAZE's competition here
META vs LKCO Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LKCO's competition here
META vs KRKR Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while KRKR trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check KRKR's competition here
META vs LCFY Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LCFY trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LCFY's competition here
META vs ONFO Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ONFO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ONFO's competition here
META vs QTT Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check QTT's competition here
META vs LOV Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check LOV's competition here
META vs ROI Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ROI's competition here
META vs CRTD Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while CRTD trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check CRTD's competition here
META vs SLE Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SLE trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SLE's competition here
META vs MNYWW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while MNYWW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check MNYWW's competition here
META vs CMCM Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while CMCM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check CMCM's competition here
META vs TC Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while TC trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check TC's competition here
META vs STBX Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check STBX's competition here
META vs ONFOW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check ONFOW's competition here
META vs SLGG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check SLGG's competition here
META vs FENG Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 243K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while FENG trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check FENG's competition here
META vs GROM Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GROM's competition here
META vs GROMW Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, META is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check GROMW's competition here
META vs PCOM Comparison August 2025
META plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, META stands at 1.9T. In comparison, PCOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, META is priced at $773.44, while PCOM trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
META currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, META's ROE is +0.39%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, META is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for META.Check PCOM's competition here