Mahindra Lifespace Developers Limited
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Limited (MAHLIFE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAHLIFE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAHLIFE.NS | ₹371.05 | +0.60% | 78.9B | 24.03 | ₹15.39 | +0.76% |
| DLF.NS | ₹611.20 | -2.41% | 1.5T | 34.15 | ₹17.91 | +0.98% |
| DLF.BO | ₹611.30 | -2.43% | 1.5T | 34.05 | ₹17.92 | +0.98% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹1,022.50 | -4.70% | 1T | 31.14 | ₹33.42 | +0.41% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹1,022.30 | -4.77% | 1T | 31.11 | ₹33.39 | +0.41% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,518.10 | -0.24% | 549.7B | 24.59 | ₹61.48 | +0.53% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,519.40 | -0.20% | 549.5B | 24.57 | ₹61.50 | +0.53% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,799.95 | -1.78% | 533.7B | 34.36 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,797.80 | -1.74% | 533.3B | 33.72 | ₹52.51 | N/A |
| ANANTRAJ.BO | ₹537.60 | -1.75% | 195.8B | 35.78 | ₹15.21 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
MAHLIFE.NS vs DLF.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while DLF.NS trades at ₹611.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check DLF.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs DLF.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while DLF.BO trades at ₹611.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 34.05. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check DLF.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs LODHA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹1,022.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.14. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs LODHA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹1,022.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 549.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,518.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 549.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,519.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 533.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,799.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 533.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,797.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 33.72. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 195.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹537.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 195.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹537.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 35.78. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹714.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹714.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SOBHA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,458.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 109.42. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SOBHA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 155.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,455.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 109.28. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 130.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹947.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 4659.75. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹947.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 4655.50. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MAHLIFE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.BO has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MAHLIFE.BO trades at ₹371.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MAHLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to MAHLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MAHLIFE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹335.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹406.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 131.63. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹405.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 131.97. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹111.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 58.18. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹111.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 57.96. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹407.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹406.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹673.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹673.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹673.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹673.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹424.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹423.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 60.47. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PURVA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹213.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -38.31. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PURVA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹214.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -38.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NIRLON.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹501.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs TARC.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while TARC.BO trades at ₹151.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -51.37. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check TARC.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs TARC.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while TARC.NS trades at ₹150.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is -50.84. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check TARC.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs AGIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹307.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KESAR.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,225.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 180.85. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹322.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.36. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹323.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹366.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 61.56. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹366.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 61.58. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹200.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹200.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,402.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 235.31. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MARATHON.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹415.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MARATHON.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹422.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs AJMERA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹131.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs AJMERA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹131.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹534.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹533.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARKADE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹114.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OMAXE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹77.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OMAXE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹77.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹78.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹78.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ASL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ASL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹591.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1587.43. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹260.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹259.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹1,032.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹216.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹636.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs AGIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹307.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.79. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹47.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MODIS.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹324.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.16. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GEECEE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹288.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs GEECEE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹286.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SBGLP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PANSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹289.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 48.10. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SBGLP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs YOGI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹160.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹64.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹65.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹201.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RVHL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹39.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs RVHL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs YAARI.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check YAARI.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs YAARI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, YAARI.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while YAARI.BO trades at ₹20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas YAARI.BO's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YAARI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is more volatile compared to YAARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check YAARI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.NS vs VIPUL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.NS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.NS stands at 78.9B. In comparison, VIPUL.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.NS is priced at ₹371.05, while VIPUL.BO trades at ₹18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.03, whereas VIPUL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.NS's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VIPUL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.NS is less volatile compared to VIPUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.NS.Check VIPUL.BO's competition here