Mahindra Lifespace Developers Limited
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Limited (MAHLIFE.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAHLIFE.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAHLIFE.BO | ₹365.65 | -1.15% | 78.6B | 23.91 | ₹15.42 | +0.76% |
| DLF.BO | ₹620.60 | -1.37% | 1.6T | 35.06 | ₹17.87 | +0.96% |
| DLF.NS | ₹620.50 | -1.40% | 1.6T | 35.05 | ₹17.87 | +0.96% |
| LODHA.BO | ₹1,064.70 | -0.60% | 1.1T | 32.12 | ₹33.42 | +0.40% |
| LODHA.NS | ₹1,067.05 | -0.38% | 1.1T | 32.10 | ₹33.42 | +0.40% |
| OBEROIRLTY.BO | ₹1,503.40 | -1.31% | 553.5B | 24.74 | ₹61.54 | +0.53% |
| OBEROIRLTY.NS | ₹1,502.70 | -1.35% | 553.3B | 24.73 | ₹61.54 | +0.53% |
| GODREJPROP.BO | ₹1,819.00 | -0.35% | 552B | 35.54 | ₹51.57 | N/A |
| GODREJPROP.NS | ₹1,824.20 | -0.08% | 551.1B | 34.80 | ₹52.58 | N/A |
| ANANTRAJ.NS | ₹545.75 | -0.54% | 197.1B | 36.03 | ₹15.20 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
MAHLIFE.BO vs DLF.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, DLF.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while DLF.BO trades at ₹620.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas DLF.BO's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to DLF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check DLF.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs DLF.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, DLF.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while DLF.NS trades at ₹620.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas DLF.NS's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to DLF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check DLF.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs LODHA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, LODHA.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while LODHA.BO trades at ₹1,064.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas LODHA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LODHA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to LODHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check LODHA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs LODHA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, LODHA.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while LODHA.NS trades at ₹1,067.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas LODHA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.10. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LODHA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to LODHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check LODHA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OBEROIRLTY.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.BO has a market cap of 553.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OBEROIRLTY.BO trades at ₹1,503.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OBEROIRLTY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OBEROIRLTY.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OBEROIRLTY.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OBEROIRLTY.NS has a market cap of 553.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OBEROIRLTY.NS trades at ₹1,502.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OBEROIRLTY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to OBEROIRLTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OBEROIRLTY.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GODREJPROP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.BO has a market cap of 552B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GODREJPROP.BO trades at ₹1,819.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GODREJPROP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.54. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GODREJPROP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GODREJPROP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GODREJPROP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GODREJPROP.NS has a market cap of 551.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GODREJPROP.NS trades at ₹1,824.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GODREJPROP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GODREJPROP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GODREJPROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GODREJPROP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ANANTRAJ.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.NS has a market cap of 197.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ANANTRAJ.NS trades at ₹545.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ANANTRAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANANTRAJ.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ANANTRAJ.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ANANTRAJ.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ANANTRAJ.BO has a market cap of 196.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ANANTRAJ.BO trades at ₹545.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ANANTRAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ANANTRAJ.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ANANTRAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ANANTRAJ.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs BRIGADE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, BRIGADE.BO has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while BRIGADE.BO trades at ₹739.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas BRIGADE.BO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIGADE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check BRIGADE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs BRIGADE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, BRIGADE.NS has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while BRIGADE.NS trades at ₹740.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas BRIGADE.NS's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRIGADE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to BRIGADE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check BRIGADE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SOBHA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SOBHA.NS has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SOBHA.NS trades at ₹1,497.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SOBHA.NS's P/E ratio is 113.60. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBHA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SOBHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SOBHA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SOBHA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SOBHA.BO has a market cap of 161.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SOBHA.BO trades at ₹1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SOBHA.BO's P/E ratio is 113.43. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SOBHA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SOBHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SOBHA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SIGNATURE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.BO has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SIGNATURE.BO trades at ₹1,038.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SIGNATURE.BO's P/E ratio is 4926.75. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGNATURE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SIGNATURE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SIGNATURE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SIGNATURE.NS has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SIGNATURE.NS trades at ₹1,037.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SIGNATURE.NS's P/E ratio is 4926.25. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIGNATURE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SIGNATURE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SIGNATURE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs IBREALEST.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, IBREALEST.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while IBREALEST.BO trades at ₹150.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas IBREALEST.BO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBREALEST.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to IBREALEST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check IBREALEST.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs IBREALEST.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, IBREALEST.NS has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while IBREALEST.NS trades at ₹131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas IBREALEST.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBREALEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to IBREALEST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check IBREALEST.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MAHLIFE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MAHLIFE.NS has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MAHLIFE.NS trades at ₹365.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MAHLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAHLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MAHLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MAHLIFE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KALPATARU.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KALPATARU.NS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KALPATARU.NS trades at ₹346.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KALPATARU.NS's P/E ratio is -67.40. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KALPATARU.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATARU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KALPATARU.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MAXESTATES.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.BO has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MAXESTATES.BO trades at ₹417.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MAXESTATES.BO's P/E ratio is 137.18. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXESTATES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MAXESTATES.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MAXESTATES.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MAXESTATES.NS has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MAXESTATES.NS trades at ₹417.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MAXESTATES.NS's P/E ratio is 137.37. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAXESTATES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MAXESTATES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MAXESTATES.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs DBREALTY.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, DBREALTY.BO has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while DBREALTY.BO trades at ₹117.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas DBREALTY.BO's P/E ratio is 60.41. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBREALTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check DBREALTY.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs DBREALTY.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, DBREALTY.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while DBREALTY.NS trades at ₹118.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas DBREALTY.NS's P/E ratio is 60.28. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DBREALTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to DBREALTY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check DBREALTY.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SUNTECK.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SUNTECK.BO has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SUNTECK.BO trades at ₹405.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SUNTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNTECK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SUNTECK.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SUNTECK.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SUNTECK.NS has a market cap of 60.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SUNTECK.NS trades at ₹406.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SUNTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUNTECK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SUNTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SUNTECK.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GANESHHOU.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.BO has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GANESHHOU.BO trades at ₹711.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GANESHHOU.BO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOU.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GANESHHOU.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GANESHHOU.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOU.NS has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GANESHHOU.NS trades at ₹712.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GANESHHOU.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOU.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GANESHHOU.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GANESHHOUC.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.BO has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GANESHHOUC.BO trades at ₹711.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GANESHHOUC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOUC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GANESHHOUC.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GANESHHOUC.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GANESHHOUC.NS has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GANESHHOUC.NS trades at ₹712.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GANESHHOUC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GANESHHOUC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GANESHHOUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GANESHHOUC.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RUSTOMJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RUSTOMJEE.NS trades at ₹442.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RUSTOMJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 63.49. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RUSTOMJEE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RUSTOMJEE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RUSTOMJEE.BO has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RUSTOMJEE.BO trades at ₹439.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RUSTOMJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 63.64. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to RUSTOMJEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RUSTOMJEE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PURVA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PURVA.NS has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PURVA.NS trades at ₹232.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PURVA.NS's P/E ratio is -39.33. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURVA.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to PURVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PURVA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PURVA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PURVA.BO has a market cap of 53.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PURVA.BO trades at ₹232.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PURVA.BO's P/E ratio is -39.21. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PURVA.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to PURVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PURVA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NIRLON.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NIRLON.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NIRLON.BO trades at ₹531.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NIRLON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NIRLON.BO's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to NIRLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NIRLON.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs TARC.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TARC.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while TARC.BO trades at ₹157.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas TARC.BO's P/E ratio is -52.01. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TARC.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to TARC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check TARC.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs TARC.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, TARC.NS has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while TARC.NS trades at ₹157.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas TARC.NS's P/E ratio is -51.92. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TARC.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to TARC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check TARC.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KESAR.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KESAR.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KESAR.BO trades at ₹1,186.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KESAR.BO's P/E ratio is 179.17. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KESAR.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to KESAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KESAR.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs AGIIL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, AGIIL.NS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while AGIIL.NS trades at ₹263.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas AGIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGIIL.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to AGIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check AGIIL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ASHIANA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ASHIANA.NS has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ASHIANA.NS trades at ₹332.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ASHIANA.NS's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHIANA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ASHIANA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ASHIANA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ASHIANA.BO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ASHIANA.BO trades at ₹335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ASHIANA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASHIANA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ASHIANA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ASHIANA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KOLTEPATIL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.NS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KOLTEPATIL.NS trades at ₹360.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KOLTEPATIL.NS's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KOLTEPATIL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KOLTEPATIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KOLTEPATIL.BO has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KOLTEPATIL.BO trades at ₹360.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KOLTEPATIL.BO's P/E ratio is 61.77. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to KOLTEPATIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KOLTEPATIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs HUBTOWN.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while HUBTOWN.NS trades at ₹210.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HUBTOWN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUBTOWN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check HUBTOWN.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs HUBTOWN.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, HUBTOWN.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while HUBTOWN.BO trades at ₹210.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HUBTOWN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUBTOWN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to HUBTOWN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check HUBTOWN.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MARATHON.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MARATHON.NS has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MARATHON.NS trades at ₹463.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MARATHON.NS's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARATHON.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MARATHON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MARATHON.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MARATHON.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MARATHON.BO has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MARATHON.BO trades at ₹463.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MARATHON.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MARATHON.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MARATHON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MARATHON.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NATIONSTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NATIONSTD.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NATIONSTD.BO trades at ₹1,435.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NATIONSTD.BO's P/E ratio is 227.70. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NATIONSTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to NATIONSTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NATIONSTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs AJMERA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, AJMERA.NS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while AJMERA.NS trades at ₹143.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas AJMERA.NS's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJMERA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to AJMERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check AJMERA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs AJMERA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, AJMERA.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while AJMERA.BO trades at ₹143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas AJMERA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJMERA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to AJMERA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check AJMERA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARVSMART.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARVSMART.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARVSMART.NS trades at ₹549.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARVSMART.NS's P/E ratio is 35.68. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARVSMART.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARVSMART.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARVSMART.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARVSMART.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARVSMART.BO trades at ₹549.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARVSMART.BO's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARVSMART.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ARVSMART.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARVSMART.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ALEMBICLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ALEMBICLTD.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ALEMBICLTD.BO trades at ₹92.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ALEMBICLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ALEMBICLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ALEMBICLTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs IBULLSLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while IBULLSLTD.BO trades at ₹9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas IBULLSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBULLSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check IBULLSLTD.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs IBULLSLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, IBULLSLTD.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while IBULLSLTD.NS trades at ₹9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas IBULLSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IBULLSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to IBULLSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check IBULLSLTD.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARKADE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARKADE.NS has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARKADE.NS trades at ₹118.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARKADE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARKADE.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ARKADE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARKADE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OMAXE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OMAXE.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OMAXE.BO trades at ₹77.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OMAXE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMAXE.BO's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to OMAXE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OMAXE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OMAXE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OMAXE.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OMAXE.NS trades at ₹78.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OMAXE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMAXE.NS's ROE of +3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to OMAXE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OMAXE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SHRIRAMPPS.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SHRIRAMPPS.NS trades at ₹80.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SHRIRAMPPS.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SHRIRAMPPS.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SHRIRAMPPS.BO has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SHRIRAMPPS.BO trades at ₹81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SHRIRAMPPS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMPPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SHRIRAMPPS.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹592.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 1626.62. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MIIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ASL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ASL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ASL.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ASL.BO's P/E ratio is -1320.85. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ASL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARIHANTSUP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARIHANTSUP.NS trades at ₹260.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARIHANTSUP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARIHANTSUP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARIHANTSUP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARIHANTSUP.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARIHANTSUP.BO trades at ₹260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARIHANTSUP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ARIHANTSUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARIHANTSUP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs ARIHANT.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, ARIHANT.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while ARIHANT.BO trades at ₹1,088.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas ARIHANT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARIHANT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to ARIHANT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check ARIHANT.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SURAJEST.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SURAJEST.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SURAJEST.NS trades at ₹214.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SURAJEST.NS's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SURAJEST.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SURAJEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SURAJEST.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RDBRIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RDBRIL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RDBRIL.BO trades at ₹53.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RDBRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 213.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDBRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to RDBRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RDBRIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MCCHRLS-B.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MCCHRLS-B.BO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MCCHRLS-B.BO trades at ₹639.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MCCHRLS-B.BO's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MCCHRLS-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MCCHRLS-B.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs HAZOOR.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, HAZOOR.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while HAZOOR.BO trades at ₹34.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas HAZOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAZOOR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to HAZOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check HAZOOR.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs AGIIL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, AGIIL.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while AGIIL.BO trades at ₹263.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas AGIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.12. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGIIL.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to AGIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check AGIIL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OSWALAGRO.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OSWALAGRO.NS trades at ₹48.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OSWALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSWALAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OSWALAGRO.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs OSWALAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, OSWALAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while OSWALAGRO.BO trades at ₹48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas OSWALAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OSWALAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to OSWALAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check OSWALAGRO.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MODIS.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MODIS.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MODIS.BO trades at ₹317.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MODIS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MODIS.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MODIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MODIS.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GEECEE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GEECEE.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GEECEE.BO trades at ₹307.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GEECEE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEECEE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to GEECEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GEECEE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PENINLAND.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PENINLAND.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PENINLAND.BO trades at ₹19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PENINLAND.BO's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENINLAND.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PENINLAND.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PENINLAND.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PENINLAND.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PENINLAND.NS trades at ₹19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PENINLAND.NS's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PENINLAND.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to PENINLAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PENINLAND.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs GEECEE.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, GEECEE.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while GEECEE.NS trades at ₹296.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas GEECEE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GEECEE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to GEECEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check GEECEE.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NILASPACES.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NILASPACES.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NILASPACES.NS trades at ₹14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NILASPACES.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILASPACES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to NILASPACES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NILASPACES.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NILASPACES.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NILASPACES.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NILASPACES.BO trades at ₹14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NILASPACES.BO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILASPACES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to NILASPACES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NILASPACES.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PANSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PANSARI.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PANSARI.NS trades at ₹301.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PANSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANSARI.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to PANSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PANSARI.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SBGLP.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SBGLP.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SBGLP.NS trades at ₹29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SBGLP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.10. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGLP.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SBGLP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SBGLP.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SBGLP.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SBGLP.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SBGLP.BO trades at ₹29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SBGLP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.77. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBGLP.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to SBGLP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SBGLP.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs YOGI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, YOGI.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while YOGI.BO trades at ₹161.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas YOGI.BO's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YOGI.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to YOGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check YOGI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NILAINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NILAINFRA.BO trades at ₹7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NILAINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILAINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NILAINFRA.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs NILAINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, NILAINFRA.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while NILAINFRA.NS trades at ₹8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas NILAINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NILAINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to NILAINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check NILAINFRA.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PARSVNATH.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PARSVNATH.NS trades at ₹7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PARSVNATH.NS's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARSVNATH.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PARSVNATH.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs PARSVNATH.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, PARSVNATH.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while PARSVNATH.BO trades at ₹7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas PARSVNATH.BO's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PARSVNATH.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to PARSVNATH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check PARSVNATH.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs EMAMIREAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while EMAMIREAL.NS trades at ₹68.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas EMAMIREAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMAMIREAL.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check EMAMIREAL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs EMAMIREAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, EMAMIREAL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while EMAMIREAL.BO trades at ₹66.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas EMAMIREAL.BO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMAMIREAL.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to EMAMIREAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check EMAMIREAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RATNABHUMI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RATNABHUMI.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RATNABHUMI.BO trades at ₹201.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RATNABHUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RATNABHUMI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to RATNABHUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RATNABHUMI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs MERCANTILE.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, MERCANTILE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while MERCANTILE.BO trades at ₹23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas MERCANTILE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MERCANTILE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to MERCANTILE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check MERCANTILE.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KBCGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KBCGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KBCGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KBCGLOBAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SVGLOBAL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SVGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SVGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹144.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SVGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SVGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SVGLOBAL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RVHL.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RVHL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RVHL.BO trades at ₹41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RVHL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVHL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to RVHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RVHL.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs RVHL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, RVHL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while RVHL.NS trades at ₹41.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas RVHL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVHL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to RVHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check RVHL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs KBCGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, KBCGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while KBCGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas KBCGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to KBCGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check KBCGLOBAL.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs YAARI.NS Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, YAARI.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while YAARI.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas YAARI.NS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YAARI.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to YAARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check YAARI.NS's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs YAARI.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, YAARI.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while YAARI.BO trades at ₹20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas YAARI.BO's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YAARI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is more volatile compared to YAARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check YAARI.BO's competition here
MAHLIFE.BO vs SUPREME.BO Comparison February 2026
MAHLIFE.BO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAHLIFE.BO stands at 78.6B. In comparison, SUPREME.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAHLIFE.BO is priced at ₹365.65, while SUPREME.BO trades at ₹58.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAHLIFE.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 23.91, whereas SUPREME.BO's P/E ratio is 78.00. In terms of profitability, MAHLIFE.BO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUPREME.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAHLIFE.BO is less volatile compared to SUPREME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAHLIFE.BO.Check SUPREME.BO's competition here