Metalpha Technology Holding Limited

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.01T. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GOOG trades at $166.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.01T. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GOOGL trades at $165.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.66T. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while META trades at $659.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas META's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 127.23B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SPOT trades at $633.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 100.99. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 83.41B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while DASH trades at $196.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 249.16. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 31.29B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while BIDU trades at $92.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 23.13B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while RDDT trades at $125.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 22.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while PINS trades at $32.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TWLO trades at $114.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -496.61. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ZG trades at $67.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -192.14. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.43B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while Z trades at $68.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -195.03. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.09B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SNAP trades at $9.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 12.46B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TME trades at $16.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 8.55B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while NBIS trades at $36.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while MTCH trades at $29.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.74B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while DJT trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while DJTWW trades at $16.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -37.44. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while CARG trades at $33.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.92. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while IAC trades at $38.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.61B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while YELP trades at $40.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GENI trades at $10.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -53.16. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.14B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while WB trades at $8.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.11B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while DOYU trades at $7.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while NN trades at $13.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -13.16. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.33B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while FVRR trades at $32.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TBLA trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 86.00. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while MOMO trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TBLAW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GRPN trades at $25.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -25.22. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 901.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while EVER trades at $24.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 829.23M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while OPRA trades at $18.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 773.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ANGI trades at $16.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 770.77M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ATHM trades at $26.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 752.42M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GETY trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 701.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while MAX trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 691.11M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while NNAVW trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 680.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SSTK trades at $19.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 634.89M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SMWB trades at $7.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -54.75. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 629.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while THRY trades at $14.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 598.79M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TTGT trades at $8.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 554.75M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while KIND trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.04. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 512.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while PERI trades at $11.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is 45.52. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PERI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 360.72M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ZH trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 354.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while AREN trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AREN's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 329.90M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TRVG trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -12.01. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 289.56M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SEAT trades at $2.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -74.33. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 283.84M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while OB trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 180.61M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ILLR trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 153.80M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 131.51M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TRUE trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 109.39M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while JOYY trades at $42.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 86.29M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while JFIN trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 72.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while BZFD trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 68.59M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while CCG trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 67.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ASST trades at $4.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.60M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BODY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 51.83M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GIFT trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 51.04M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while PODC trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 46.01M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while IZEA trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.69M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 33.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while MNY trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 32.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while BODI trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 31.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ZDGE trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -16.86. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 28.55M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SEATW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.14M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SCOR trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.43M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.20M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.82M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LIZI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FAZE's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 13.95M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while UPXI trades at $9.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -2.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.64M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while KRKR trades at $5.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 10.26M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while NAMI trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NAMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 9.07M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LCFYW trades at $6.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -86.88. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LCFY trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ONFO trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SLE trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLE's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ROI's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while CRTD trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while CMCM trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.12M. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 871657.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while ONFOW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291828.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SLGG's ROE of -4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 235117.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while FENG trades at $2.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32055.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while SOGP trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 9169.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while TC trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8119.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.

LYL plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LYL stands at 15.54M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2634.00. Regarding current trading prices, LYL is priced at $0.50, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LYL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.65, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LYL is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYL.