Trident Texofab Limited (TTFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TTFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Textiles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTFL.BO | ₹43.74 | -0.09% | 655.9M | 22.66 | ₹1.93 | N/A |
| MAFATIND.BO | ₹133.80 | -1.36% | 9.7B | 10.73 | ₹12.47 | +1.68% |
| RAJPALAYAM.BO | ₹800.00 | -2.44% | 7.4B | 9.20 | ₹87.00 | +0.06% |
| GLOSTERLTD.NS | ₹665.75 | -1.83% | 7.3B | 96.21 | ₹6.92 | +3.00% |
| DIGJAMLTD.NS | ₹82.99 | +1.21% | 7.3B | 7.77 | ₹10.68 | N/A |
| GLOSTERLTD.BO | ₹662.15 | -3.07% | 7.2B | 95.00 | ₹6.97 | +3.00% |
| VOITHPAPR.BO | ₹1,578.25 | -1.57% | 6.9B | 15.88 | ₹99.39 | +0.63% |
| VTMLTD.BO | ₹63.50 | -3.93% | 6.4B | 28.48 | ₹2.23 | +1.34% |
| LAKSHMIMIL.BO | ₹7,412.70 | -1.16% | 5.2B | -33.17 | -₹223.50 | N/A |
| SHRJAGP.BO | ₹579.35 | -2.14% | 5.1B | 14.00 | ₹41.38 | +0.13% |
Stock Comparison
TTFL.BO vs MAFATIND.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, MAFATIND.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while MAFATIND.BO trades at ₹133.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas MAFATIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAFATIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to MAFATIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check MAFATIND.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs RAJPALAYAM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, RAJPALAYAM.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while RAJPALAYAM.BO trades at ₹800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas RAJPALAYAM.BO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to RAJPALAYAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check RAJPALAYAM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GLOSTERLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GLOSTERLTD.NS trades at ₹665.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GLOSTERLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 96.21. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DIGJAMLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GLOSTERLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GLOSTERLTD.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GLOSTERLTD.BO trades at ₹662.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GLOSTERLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 95.00. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to GLOSTERLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GLOSTERLTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs VOITHPAPR.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, VOITHPAPR.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while VOITHPAPR.BO trades at ₹1,578.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas VOITHPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VOITHPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to VOITHPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check VOITHPAPR.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs VTMLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, VTMLTD.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while VTMLTD.BO trades at ₹63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas VTMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTMLTD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to VTMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check VTMLTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs LAKSHMIMIL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, LAKSHMIMIL.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while LAKSHMIMIL.BO trades at ₹7,412.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas LAKSHMIMIL.BO's P/E ratio is -33.17. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSHMIMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check LAKSHMIMIL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHRJAGP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHRJAGP.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHRJAGP.BO trades at ₹579.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHRJAGP.BO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRJAGP.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRJAGP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHRJAGP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs AKSPINTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, AKSPINTEX.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while AKSPINTEX.BO trades at ₹943.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas AKSPINTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 74.69. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKSPINTEX.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to AKSPINTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check AKSPINTEX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs RAGHUSYN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, RAGHUSYN.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while RAGHUSYN.BO trades at ₹101.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas RAGHUSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 61.11. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAGHUSYN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to RAGHUSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check RAGHUSYN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs LUDLOWJUT.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, LUDLOWJUT.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while LUDLOWJUT.BO trades at ₹358.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas LUDLOWJUT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to LUDLOWJUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check LUDLOWJUT.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs HIMFIBP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, HIMFIBP.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while HIMFIBP.BO trades at ₹43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas HIMFIBP.BO's P/E ratio is -118.30. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMFIBP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to HIMFIBP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check HIMFIBP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SUDTIND-B.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SUDTIND-B.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SUDTIND-B.BO trades at ₹91.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SUDTIND-B.BO's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUDTIND-B.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SUDTIND-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SUDTIND-B.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs CNOVAPETRO.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while CNOVAPETRO.BO trades at ₹112.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas CNOVAPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is -211.51. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs MANOMAY.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, MANOMAY.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while MANOMAY.BO trades at ₹179.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas MANOMAY.BO's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANOMAY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to MANOMAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check MANOMAY.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs MANOMAY.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, MANOMAY.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while MANOMAY.NS trades at ₹177.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas MANOMAY.NS's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANOMAY.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to MANOMAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check MANOMAY.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs BARODARY.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, BARODARY.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while BARODARY.BO trades at ₹126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas BARODARY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BARODARY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to BARODARY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check BARODARY.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SUPER.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SUPER.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SUPER.BO trades at ₹811.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SUPER.BO's P/E ratio is 70.10. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUPER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SUPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SUPER.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs RRIL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, RRIL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while RRIL.BO trades at ₹20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas RRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to RRIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check RRIL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs MKEXIM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, MKEXIM.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while MKEXIM.BO trades at ₹54.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas MKEXIM.BO's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKEXIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to MKEXIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check MKEXIM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs RNBDENIMS.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, RNBDENIMS.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while RNBDENIMS.BO trades at ₹12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas RNBDENIMS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNBDENIMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to RNBDENIMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check RNBDENIMS.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs OSIAJEE.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, OSIAJEE.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while OSIAJEE.BO trades at ₹400.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas OSIAJEE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSIAJEE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to OSIAJEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check OSIAJEE.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs BTTL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, BTTL.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while BTTL.BO trades at ₹34.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas BTTL.BO's P/E ratio is 174.50. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTTL.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to BTTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check BTTL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs FILATFASH.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, FILATFASH.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while FILATFASH.BO trades at ₹0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas FILATFASH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FILATFASH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to FILATFASH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check FILATFASH.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHIVATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHIVATEX.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHIVATEX.BO trades at ₹154.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHIVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHIVATEX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHIVATEX.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHIVATEX.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHIVATEX.NS trades at ₹153.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHIVATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHIVATEX.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHIVATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHIVATEX.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SURYALA.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SURYALA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SURYALA.BO trades at ₹458.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SURYALA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SURYALA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SURYALA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SURYALA.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHAHLON.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHAHLON.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHAHLON.BO trades at ₹21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHAHLON.BO's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHAHLON.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHAHLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHAHLON.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs JATTAINDUS.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, JATTAINDUS.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while JATTAINDUS.BO trades at ₹402.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas JATTAINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 1258.75. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JATTAINDUS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to JATTAINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check JATTAINDUS.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs WINSOMTX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, WINSOMTX.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while WINSOMTX.BO trades at ₹89.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas WINSOMTX.BO's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WINSOMTX.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to WINSOMTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check WINSOMTX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHRIDINE.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHRIDINE.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHRIDINE.BO trades at ₹302.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHRIDINE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIDINE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIDINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHRIDINE.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DIGJAMLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DIGJAMLTD.BO trades at ₹83.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DIGJAMLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.BO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DIGJAMLTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ZBINTXPP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ZBINTXPP.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ZBINTXPP.BO trades at ₹1,990.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ZBINTXPP.BO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZBINTXPP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ZBINTXPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ZBINTXPP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SWADPOL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SWADPOL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SWADPOL.BO trades at ₹34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SWADPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWADPOL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SWADPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SWADPOL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs PREMCO.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, PREMCO.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while PREMCO.BO trades at ₹386.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas PREMCO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PREMCO.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to PREMCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check PREMCO.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs LAHOTIOV.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, LAHOTIOV.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while LAHOTIOV.BO trades at ₹43.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas LAHOTIOV.BO's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAHOTIOV.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to LAHOTIOV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check LAHOTIOV.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs CANDOUR.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, CANDOUR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while CANDOUR.BO trades at ₹67.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas CANDOUR.BO's P/E ratio is -30.72. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CANDOUR.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to CANDOUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check CANDOUR.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs BHUDEVI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, BHUDEVI.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while BHUDEVI.BO trades at ₹250.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas BHUDEVI.BO's P/E ratio is -74.69. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHUDEVI.BO's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to BHUDEVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check BHUDEVI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GARNETINT.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GARNETINT.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GARNETINT.BO trades at ₹58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GARNETINT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARNETINT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to GARNETINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GARNETINT.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ADDIND.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ADDIND.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ADDIND.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ADDIND.BO's P/E ratio is 38.17. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADDIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ADDIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ADDIND.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs AMARJOTHI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, AMARJOTHI.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while AMARJOTHI.BO trades at ₹159.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas AMARJOTHI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMARJOTHI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to AMARJOTHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check AMARJOTHI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ARL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ARL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ARL.BO trades at ₹50.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ARL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ARL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ARL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs BHILSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, BHILSPIN.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while BHILSPIN.BO trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas BHILSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHILSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to BHILSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check BHILSPIN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs JCTLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, JCTLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while JCTLTD.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas JCTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JCTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to JCTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check JCTLTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ALSTONE.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ALSTONE.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ALSTONE.BO trades at ₹0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ALSTONE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALSTONE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to ALSTONE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ALSTONE.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs VIPPYSP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, VIPPYSP.BO has a market cap of 995.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while VIPPYSP.BO trades at ₹169.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas VIPPYSP.BO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIPPYSP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to VIPPYSP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check VIPPYSP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SURATRAML.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SURATRAML.BO has a market cap of 994.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SURATRAML.BO trades at ₹4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SURATRAML.BO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SURATRAML.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SURATRAML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SURATRAML.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs KGPETRO.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, KGPETRO.BO has a market cap of 981.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while KGPETRO.BO trades at ₹188.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas KGPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to KGPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check KGPETRO.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs AICHAMP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, AICHAMP.BO has a market cap of 978.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while AICHAMP.BO trades at ₹31.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas AICHAMP.BO's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AICHAMP.BO's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to AICHAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check AICHAMP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs HINDAPL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, HINDAPL.BO has a market cap of 972.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while HINDAPL.BO trades at ₹97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas HINDAPL.BO's P/E ratio is 881.91. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDAPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to HINDAPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check HINDAPL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs CFEL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, CFEL.BO has a market cap of 938.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while CFEL.BO trades at ₹37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas CFEL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to CFEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check CFEL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs APMIN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, APMIN.BO has a market cap of 909.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while APMIN.BO trades at ₹42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas APMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 59.30. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APMIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to APMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check APMIN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DIGJAMLMTD.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.NS has a market cap of 908.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DIGJAMLMTD.NS trades at ₹45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.NS's P/E ratio is 56.06. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DIGJAMLMTD.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DIGJAMLMTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DIGJAMLMTD.BO has a market cap of 906.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DIGJAMLMTD.BO trades at ₹45.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DIGJAMLMTD.BO's P/E ratio is 56.64. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIGJAMLMTD.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLMTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DIGJAMLMTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs FLORATX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, FLORATX.BO has a market cap of 830.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while FLORATX.BO trades at ₹138.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas FLORATX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLORATX.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to FLORATX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check FLORATX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs INDIANACRY.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, INDIANACRY.BO has a market cap of 817.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while INDIANACRY.BO trades at ₹6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas INDIANACRY.BO's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDIANACRY.BO's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to INDIANACRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check INDIANACRY.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DEEPAKSP.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DEEPAKSP.BO has a market cap of 804.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DEEPAKSP.BO trades at ₹111.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DEEPAKSP.BO's P/E ratio is 155.49. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEEPAKSP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to DEEPAKSP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DEEPAKSP.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SUPTANERY.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SUPTANERY.BO has a market cap of 794.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SUPTANERY.BO trades at ₹7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SUPTANERY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUPTANERY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SUPTANERY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SUPTANERY.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ECOHOTELS.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ECOHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 759.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ECOHOTELS.BO trades at ₹14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ECOHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ECOHOTELS.BO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ECOHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ECOHOTELS.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs KAMADGIRI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, KAMADGIRI.BO has a market cap of 753.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while KAMADGIRI.BO trades at ₹128.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas KAMADGIRI.BO's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAMADGIRI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to KAMADGIRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check KAMADGIRI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SANTETX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SANTETX.BO has a market cap of 752.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SANTETX.BO trades at ₹132.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SANTETX.BO's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANTETX.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SANTETX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SANTETX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHANTAI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHANTAI.BO has a market cap of 749.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHANTAI.BO trades at ₹99.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHANTAI.BO's P/E ratio is -90.90. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHANTAI.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTAI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHANTAI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SKYIND.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SKYIND.BO has a market cap of 707.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SKYIND.BO trades at ₹89.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SKYIND.BO's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SKYIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SKYIND.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs BETXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, BETXIND.BO has a market cap of 702M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while BETXIND.BO trades at ₹468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas BETXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BETXIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to BETXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check BETXIND.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs EVERFIN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, EVERFIN.BO has a market cap of 694.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while EVERFIN.BO trades at ₹112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas EVERFIN.BO's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVERFIN.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to EVERFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check EVERFIN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHINEFASH.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHINEFASH.BO has a market cap of 681.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHINEFASH.BO trades at ₹27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHINEFASH.BO's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHINEFASH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHINEFASH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHINEFASH.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SHUBHAM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SHUBHAM.BO has a market cap of 678.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SHUBHAM.BO trades at ₹55.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SHUBHAM.BO's P/E ratio is 65.07. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHUBHAM.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHUBHAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SHUBHAM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs LAKHOTIA.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, LAKHOTIA.BO has a market cap of 665.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while LAKHOTIA.BO trades at ₹63.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas LAKHOTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAKHOTIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to LAKHOTIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check LAKHOTIA.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs RIBATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, RIBATEX.BO has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while RIBATEX.BO trades at ₹63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas RIBATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RIBATEX.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to RIBATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check RIBATEX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ASHNOOR.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ASHNOOR.BO has a market cap of 608.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ASHNOOR.BO trades at ₹38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ASHNOOR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASHNOOR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ASHNOOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ASHNOOR.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs VICTMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, VICTMILL.BO has a market cap of 593.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while VICTMILL.BO trades at ₹6,025.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas VICTMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VICTMILL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to VICTMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check VICTMILL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ARMAN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ARMAN.BO has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ARMAN.BO trades at ₹108.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ARMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 102.55. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMAN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ARMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ARMAN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs TILAK.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, TILAK.BO has a market cap of 530.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while TILAK.BO trades at ₹1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas TILAK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TILAK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to TILAK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check TILAK.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs MOHITE.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, MOHITE.BO has a market cap of 488.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while MOHITE.BO trades at ₹2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas MOHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOHITE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to MOHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check MOHITE.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SAMBANDAM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SAMBANDAM.BO has a market cap of 474.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SAMBANDAM.BO trades at ₹111.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SAMBANDAM.BO's P/E ratio is -18.94. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAMBANDAM.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SAMBANDAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SAMBANDAM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs WIREFABR.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, WIREFABR.BO has a market cap of 470.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while WIREFABR.BO trades at ₹153.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas WIREFABR.BO's P/E ratio is 110.68. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WIREFABR.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to WIREFABR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check WIREFABR.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs DHANFAB.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, DHANFAB.BO has a market cap of 437.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while DHANFAB.BO trades at ₹50.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas DHANFAB.BO's P/E ratio is -30.15. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHANFAB.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to DHANFAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check DHANFAB.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs CNOVAPETRO.NS Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, CNOVAPETRO.NS has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while CNOVAPETRO.NS trades at ₹16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas CNOVAPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to CNOVAPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check CNOVAPETRO.NS's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GTNINDS.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GTNINDS.BO has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GTNINDS.BO trades at ₹24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GTNINDS.BO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTNINDS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to GTNINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GTNINDS.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs PARMSILK.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, PARMSILK.BO has a market cap of 419.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while PARMSILK.BO trades at ₹139.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas PARMSILK.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PARMSILK.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to PARMSILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check PARMSILK.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SREEJAYA.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SREEJAYA.BO has a market cap of 416M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SREEJAYA.BO trades at ₹92.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SREEJAYA.BO's P/E ratio is -172.04. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SREEJAYA.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SREEJAYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SREEJAYA.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs HPCOTTON.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, HPCOTTON.BO has a market cap of 407.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while HPCOTTON.BO trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas HPCOTTON.BO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPCOTTON.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to HPCOTTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check HPCOTTON.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs AREXMIS.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, AREXMIS.BO has a market cap of 406.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while AREXMIS.BO trades at ₹113.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas AREXMIS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AREXMIS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to AREXMIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check AREXMIS.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs KGDENIM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, KGDENIM.BO has a market cap of 403.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while KGDENIM.BO trades at ₹15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas KGDENIM.BO's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGDENIM.BO's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to KGDENIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check KGDENIM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs CAMEXLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, CAMEXLTD.BO has a market cap of 400.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while CAMEXLTD.BO trades at ₹39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas CAMEXLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAMEXLTD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to CAMEXLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check CAMEXLTD.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs PBMPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, PBMPOLY.BO has a market cap of 391.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while PBMPOLY.BO trades at ₹56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas PBMPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -62.60. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBMPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to PBMPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check PBMPOLY.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GOKAKTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GOKAKTEX.BO has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GOKAKTEX.BO trades at ₹60.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GOKAKTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOKAKTEX.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to GOKAKTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GOKAKTEX.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SUBSM.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SUBSM.BO has a market cap of 381.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SUBSM.BO trades at ₹90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SUBSM.BO's P/E ratio is -35.71. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUBSM.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUBSM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SUBSM.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GEMSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GEMSPIN.BO has a market cap of 376.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GEMSPIN.BO trades at ₹6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GEMSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is -76.75. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GEMSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to GEMSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GEMSPIN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SWASTIVI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SWASTIVI.BO has a market cap of 356.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SWASTIVI.BO trades at ₹3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SWASTIVI.BO's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWASTIVI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to SWASTIVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SWASTIVI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs SURYAAMBA.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, SURYAAMBA.BO has a market cap of 348.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while SURYAAMBA.BO trades at ₹119.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas SURYAAMBA.BO's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SURYAAMBA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to SURYAAMBA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check SURYAAMBA.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ANJANI.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ANJANI.BO has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ANJANI.BO trades at ₹22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ANJANI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANJANI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to ANJANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ANJANI.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs YARNSYN.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, YARNSYN.BO has a market cap of 316.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while YARNSYN.BO trades at ₹14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas YARNSYN.BO's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YARNSYN.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to YARNSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check YARNSYN.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs GINISILK.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, GINISILK.BO has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while GINISILK.BO trades at ₹55.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas GINISILK.BO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GINISILK.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to GINISILK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check GINISILK.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs KATRSPG.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, KATRSPG.BO has a market cap of 296.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while KATRSPG.BO trades at ₹103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas KATRSPG.BO's P/E ratio is -22.65. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KATRSPG.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to KATRSPG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check KATRSPG.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs ANGEL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, ANGEL.BO has a market cap of 285.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while ANGEL.BO trades at ₹11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas ANGEL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANGEL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to ANGEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check ANGEL.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs KAPILCO.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, KAPILCO.BO has a market cap of 285.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while KAPILCO.BO trades at ₹148.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas KAPILCO.BO's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAPILCO.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is more volatile compared to KAPILCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check KAPILCO.BO's competition here
TTFL.BO vs HINDMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
TTFL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TTFL.BO stands at 655.9M. In comparison, HINDMILL.BO has a market cap of 280.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TTFL.BO is priced at ₹43.74, while HINDMILL.BO trades at ₹168.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TTFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.66, whereas HINDMILL.BO's P/E ratio is -26.11. In terms of profitability, TTFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HINDMILL.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TTFL.BO is less volatile compared to HINDMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TTFL.BO.Check HINDMILL.BO's competition here