Lundin Mining Corporation
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUN.TO | CA$14.41 | +3.56% | 12.3B | 84.76 | CA$0.17 | +2.34% |
| FM.TO | CA$23.34 | +5.23% | 19.3B | 66.69 | CA$0.35 | N/A |
| CS.TO | CA$8.52 | +4.28% | 6.5B | 60.86 | CA$0.14 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$12.70 | +1.52% | 5B | 23.52 | CA$0.54 | +0.16% |
| ERO.TO | CA$19.19 | +3.67% | 2B | 10.05 | CA$1.91 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$13.37 | +1.44% | 1.8B | -11.33 | -CA$1.18 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$4.23 | -0.47% | 1.3B | -20.14 | -CA$0.21 | N/A |
| MARI.TO | CA$9.95 | +1.53% | 1.1B | -55.28 | -CA$0.18 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | CA$5.78 | +8.85% | 835.8M | 10.70 | CA$0.54 | N/A |
| III.TO | CA$3.95 | -1.25% | 644M | 4.11 | CA$0.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUN.TO vs FM.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while FM.TO trades at CA$23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 66.69. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs CS.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while CS.TO trades at CA$8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 60.86. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while HBM.TO trades at CA$12.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while ERO.TO trades at CA$19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs IE.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while IE.TO trades at CA$13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while TKO.TO trades at CA$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -20.14. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while MARI.TO trades at CA$9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs III.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 644M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while III.TO trades at CA$3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -32.57. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 352M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while ARG.TO trades at CA$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while FDY.TO trades at CA$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUN.TO has daily volatility of 3.37 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison August 2025
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$14.41, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 84.76, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here