Lundin Mining Corporation
Lundin Mining Corporation (LUN.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUN.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUN.TO | CA$37.71 | -0.66% | 32.2B | 22.18 | CA$1.70 | +0.36% |
| FM.TO | CA$37.28 | -0.77% | 30.9B | -932.00 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | CA$32.45 | -1.34% | 12.9B | 16.14 | CA$2.01 | +0.06% |
| CS.TO | CA$11.86 | -0.25% | 9.1B | 20.81 | CA$0.57 | N/A |
| ERO.TO | CA$42.58 | +1.50% | 4.4B | 12.10 | CA$3.52 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | CA$9.84 | -1.50% | 3.1B | -109.33 | -CA$0.09 | N/A |
| IE.TO | CA$17.94 | -1.21% | 2.8B | -14.83 | -CA$1.21 | N/A |
| III.TO | CA$8.11 | -0.73% | 1.4B | 9.43 | CA$0.86 | N/A |
| ASCU.TO | CA$7.87 | -0.76% | 1.4B | -196.75 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| FDY.TO | CA$4.58 | +1.10% | 1.3B | -38.17 | -CA$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LUN.TO vs FM.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while FM.TO trades at CA$37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is -932.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check FM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while HBM.TO trades at CA$32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to HBM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check HBM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs CS.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while CS.TO trades at CA$11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CS.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while ERO.TO trades at CA$42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ERO.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while TKO.TO trades at CA$9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -109.33. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check TKO.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs IE.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while IE.TO trades at CA$17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.83. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check IE.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs III.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, III.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while III.TO trades at CA$8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas III.TO's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to III.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to III.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check III.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while ASCU.TO trades at CA$7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -196.75. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ASCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while FDY.TO trades at CA$4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -38.17. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check FDY.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while MARI.TO trades at CA$8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -24.69. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check MARI.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 910.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while ARG.TO trades at CA$5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ARG.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while AYM.TO trades at CA$5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check AYM.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while CMMC.TO trades at CA$2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CMMC.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs GCU.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, GCU.TO has a market cap of 160.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while GCU.TO trades at CA$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas GCU.TO's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GCU.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to GCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check GCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs ATCU.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, ATCU.TO has a market cap of 131M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while ATCU.TO trades at CA$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas ATCU.TO's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ATCU.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to ATCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check ATCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while CCI.CN trades at CA$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check CCI.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while NCU.TO trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check NCU.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while DNT.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check DNT.TO's competition here
LUN.TO vs XXIX.V Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, XXIX.V has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while XXIX.V trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas XXIX.V's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to XXIX.V's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is less volatile compared to XXIX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check XXIX.V's competition here
LUN.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while RCLF.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. LUN.TO has daily volatility of 2.88 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check RCLF.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while AFX.CN trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -15.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check AFX.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs WEC.V Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, WEC.V has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while WEC.V trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas WEC.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WEC.V's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to WEC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check WEC.V's competition here
LUN.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681K. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while JUBA.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check JUBA.CN's competition here
LUN.TO vs TRQ.TO Comparison April 2026
LUN.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUN.TO stands at 32.2B. In comparison, TRQ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUN.TO is priced at CA$37.71, while TRQ.TO trades at CA$42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUN.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 22.18, whereas TRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LUN.TO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRQ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUN.TO is more volatile compared to TRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUN.TO.Check TRQ.TO's competition here