What are the top competitors of Lululemon Athletica Inc. in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of Lululemon Athletica Inc. in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO), Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, Lululemon Athletica Inc. or its competitors?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has a market cap of 23.1B and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: Lululemon Athletica Inc. or its competitors?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has an EPS of $0.65, while ATZ.TO has an EPS of $2.93. So, Lululemon Athletica Inc. is more profitable compared to ATZ.TO.

What is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has daily volatility of 3.37% as compared to its competitor ATZ.TO which is 3.95%. Lululemon Athletica Inc. is less volatile as compared to competitors and has low risk.

Is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock profitable?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.35%. So, Lululemon Athletica Inc. is more profitable.

What is Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock has a 52-week high of ($18.74) and a low of ($6.71).

What was the average volume of Lululemon Athletica Inc. stock?

The average volume of Lululemon Athletica Inc. is (266.8K) in terms of investment.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE) Competitors

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See (LULU.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
LULU.NE	CA$6.79	-2.16%	23.1B	10.45	CA$0.65	N/A
ATZ.TO	CA$114.25	-1.35%	11.1B	38.99	CA$2.93	N/A
ROOT.TO	CA$3.94	+1.29%	156.1M	-4.92	-CA$0.80	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

LULU.NE vs ATZ.TO Comparison April 2026

LULU.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 23.1B. In comparison, ATZ.TO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at CA$6.79, while ATZ.TO trades at CA$114.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 10.45, whereas ATZ.TO's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ATZ.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is less volatile compared to ATZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.Check ATZ.TO's competition here

Lululemon Athletica Inc.