What are the top competitors of LULU.NE in Consumer Cyclical sector?

The top competitors of LULU.NE in the Consumer Cyclical sector are: Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO), Roots Corporation (ROOT.TO).

Which has better valuations & earnings, LULU.NE or its competitors?

LULU.NE has a market cap of 55.72B and a Dividend Yield of N/A compared to its competitors.

Which stock is more profitable: LULU.NE or its competitors?

LULU.NE has an EPS of $0.68, while ATZ.TO has an EPS of $1.78. So, LULU.NE is more profitable compared to ATZ.TO.

What is LULU.NE stock volatility and risk in terms of investment?

LULU.NE has daily volatility of 3% as compared to its competitor ATZ.TO which is 1.85%. LULU.NE is more volatile as compared to competitors and has high risk.

Is LULU.NE stock profitable?

LULU.NE has a Return on Equity (ROE) of 0.44%. So, LULU.NE is more profitable.

What is LULU.NE stock’s 52 weeks high and low?

LULU.NE stock has a 52-week high of ($19.05) and a low of ($10.57).

What was the average volume of LULU.NE stock?

The average volume of LULU.NE is (49010.00) in terms of investment.

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU.NE) Competitors

Lululemon Athletica Inc. LULU.NE Peers

See (LULU.NE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Retail Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

Symbol	Price	Change %	Market Cap	P/E Ratio	EPS	Dividend Yield
LULU.NE	$14.41	+0.84%	55.72B	21.19	$0.68	N/A
ATZ.TO	$66.25	-0.06%	6.27B	37.22	$1.78	N/A
ROOT.TO	$3.14	+2.28%	127.01M	-3.78	-$0.83	N/A

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

LULU.NE vs ATZ.TO Comparison

LULU.NE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LULU.NE stands at 55.72B. In comparison, ATZ.TO has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, LULU.NE is priced at $14.41, while ATZ.TO trades at $66.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LULU.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 21.19, whereas ATZ.TO's P/E ratio is 37.22. In terms of profitability, LULU.NE's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ATZ.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LULU.NE is more volatile compared to ATZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LULU.NE.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.