Lotus Resources Limited
Lotus Resources Limited (LTSRF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LTSRF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTSRF | $0.12 | +7.62% | 284.6M | -12.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $25.91 | -1.12% | 131.5B | 14.64 | $1.77 | +4.79% |
| RTNTF | $72.87 | +1.33% | 118.3B | 11.60 | $6.28 | +5.25% |
| RTPPF | $60.73 | +0.00% | 98.6B | 9.67 | $6.28 | +6.14% |
| GMBXF | $6.63 | -0.30% | 51.6B | 13.26 | $0.50 | +3.65% |
| CYLYF | $0.02 | +0.00% | 49.6B | -0.79 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| GLNCY | $7.90 | +0.51% | 47.7B | -24.62 | -$0.32 | +2.74% |
| GLCNF | $3.93 | -0.13% | 46.6B | -24.53 | -$0.16 | +2.90% |
| FSUGY | $24.69 | -4.38% | 38B | 9.77 | $2.53 | +7.35% |
| FSUMF | $11.80 | -9.23% | 36.3B | 9.29 | $1.27 | +7.22% |
Stock Comparison
LTSRF vs BHPLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while BHPLF trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check BHPLF's competition here
LTSRF vs RTNTF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 118.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while RTNTF trades at $72.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to RTNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check RTNTF's competition here
LTSRF vs RTPPF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while RTPPF trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to RTPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check RTPPF's competition here
LTSRF vs GMBXF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while GMBXF trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check GMBXF's competition here
LTSRF vs CYLYF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CYLYF has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CYLYF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CYLYF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CYLYF's ROE of -10.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to CYLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CYLYF's competition here
LTSRF vs GLNCY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while GLNCY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check GLNCY's competition here
LTSRF vs GLCNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while GLCNF trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -24.53. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check GLCNF's competition here
LTSRF vs FSUGY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FSUGY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FSUGY's competition here
LTSRF vs FSUMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FSUMF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FSUMF's competition here
LTSRF vs NGLOY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NGLOY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.34. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NGLOY's competition here
LTSRF vs AAUKF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AAUKF trades at $29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AAUKF's competition here
LTSRF vs CMCLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CMCLF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CMCLF's competition here
LTSRF vs TCKRF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while TCKRF trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check TCKRF's competition here
LTSRF vs IVPAF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while IVPAF trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check IVPAF's competition here
LTSRF vs IPOAF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, IPOAF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while IPOAF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IPOAF's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPOAF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to IPOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check IPOAF's competition here
LTSRF vs BDNNY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while BDNNY trades at $68.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check BDNNY's competition here
LTSRF vs BOLIF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to BOLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check BOLIF's competition here
LTSRF vs LYSCF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while LYSCF trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check LYSCF's competition here
LTSRF vs LYSDY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while LYSDY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 320.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check LYSDY's competition here
LTSRF vs JXMNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check JXMNF's competition here
LTSRF vs SHTLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SHTLF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SHTLF's competition here
LTSRF vs SMMYY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SMMYY trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 66.55. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SMMYY's competition here
LTSRF vs ABML Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ABML's competition here
LTSRF vs STMNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while STMNF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 56.10. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to STMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check STMNF's competition here
LTSRF vs PUTKY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PUTKY trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PUTKY's competition here
LTSRF vs PUTKF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PUTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PUTKF's competition here
LTSRF vs NILSY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to NILSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NILSY's competition here
LTSRF vs MALRY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MALRY trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MALRY's competition here
LTSRF vs PILBF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PILBF trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -139.50. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PILBF's competition here
LTSRF vs MALRF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MALRF trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MALRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MALRF's competition here
LTSRF vs PAEKY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PAEKY trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PAEKY's competition here
LTSRF vs NGXXF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NGXXF trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -48.23. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NGXXF's competition here
LTSRF vs FLMMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FLMMF's competition here
LTSRF vs IPGDF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while IPGDF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to IPGDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check IPGDF's competition here
LTSRF vs CHZQ Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to CHZQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CHZQ's competition here
LTSRF vs IIDDY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while IIDDY trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check IIDDY's competition here
LTSRF vs MIMTF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MIMTF trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MIMTF's competition here
LTSRF vs PTNDY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PTNDY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PTNDY's competition here
LTSRF vs NICMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NICMF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to NICMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NICMF's competition here
LTSRF vs DWMNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while DWMNF trades at $33.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check DWMNF's competition here
LTSRF vs AZZVF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AZZVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AZZVF's competition here
LTSRF vs AFBOF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AFBOF trades at $9.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AFBOF's competition here
LTSRF vs ILKAY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ILKAY trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ILKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ILKAY's competition here
LTSRF vs ILKAF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ILKAF trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ILKAF's competition here
LTSRF vs ERMAY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ERMAY trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is -15.53. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ERMAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ERMAY's competition here
LTSRF vs SOUHY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SOUHY trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.19. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SOUHY's competition here
LTSRF vs ERMAF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ERMAF trades at $59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is -14.94. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ERMAF's competition here
LTSRF vs PTNDF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PTNDF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PTNDF's competition here
LTSRF vs LINRF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while LINRF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -54.40. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check LINRF's competition here
LTSRF vs DETRF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while DETRF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to DETRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check DETRF's competition here
LTSRF vs TAOFF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while TAOFF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -17.60. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check TAOFF's competition here
LTSRF vs ADMLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ADMLF trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ADMLF's competition here
LTSRF vs ADTLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ADTLF trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.69. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ADTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ADTLF's competition here
LTSRF vs AUSDF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AUSDF trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AUSDF's competition here
LTSRF vs FMCXF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FMCXF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -109.50. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FMCXF's competition here
LTSRF vs NCKAF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NCKAF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NCKAF's competition here
LTSRF vs AZRMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AZRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AZRMF's competition here
LTSRF vs MFRVF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MFRVF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MFRVF's competition here
LTSRF vs AFMJF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 982.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AFMJF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AFMJF's competition here
LTSRF vs ATUSF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 971.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ATUSF trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ATUSF's competition here
LTSRF vs AMVMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 968.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while AMVMF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is 93.75. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to AMVMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check AMVMF's competition here
LTSRF vs STTSY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 899.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to STTSY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check STTSY's competition here
LTSRF vs ALMTF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 870.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ALMTF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -23.84. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ALMTF's competition here
LTSRF vs BIRNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 721.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while BIRNF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check BIRNF's competition here
LTSRF vs SLGGF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 637.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SLGGF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SLGGF's competition here
LTSRF vs REEMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 614.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while REEMF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -39.67. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check REEMF's competition here
LTSRF vs CREQF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CREQF has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CREQF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CREQF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CREQF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to CREQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CREQF's competition here
LTSRF vs CTJHF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CTJHF's competition here
LTSRF vs VULNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 586.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while VULNF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check VULNF's competition here
LTSRF vs MJDLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 540.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MJDLF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MJDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MJDLF's competition here
LTSRF vs BQSSF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 531.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while BQSSF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check BQSSF's competition here
LTSRF vs MCHHF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 516.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MCHHF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MCHHF's competition here
LTSRF vs MNXMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 511.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MNXMF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -78.34. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MNXMF's competition here
LTSRF vs TTNNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check TTNNF's competition here
LTSRF vs PTTMF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 490.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PTTMF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PTTMF's competition here
LTSRF vs OSTTF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check OSTTF's competition here
LTSRF vs MCRZF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MCRZF's competition here
LTSRF vs PXMFF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 462.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PXMFF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PXMFF's competition here
LTSRF vs FGOVF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FGOVF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -85.90. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FGOVF's competition here
LTSRF vs PMETF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 448.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PMETF trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -138.30. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PMETF's competition here
LTSRF vs VTMLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, VTMLF has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while VTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas VTMLF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to VTMLF's ROE of -4.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to VTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check VTMLF's competition here
LTSRF vs CGMLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 389.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CGMLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CGMLF's competition here
LTSRF vs KMRPF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while KMRPF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check KMRPF's competition here
LTSRF vs NQMIY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to NQMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check NQMIY's competition here
LTSRF vs FWEDF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 374.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while FWEDF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -12.79. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check FWEDF's competition here
LTSRF vs MLYF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 374.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MLYF's competition here
LTSRF vs MMILF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MMILF has a market cap of 365.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MMILF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MMILF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MMILF's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MMILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MMILF's competition here
LTSRF vs MLXEF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MLXEF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MLXEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MLXEF's competition here
LTSRF vs CTJHY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to CTJHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check CTJHY's competition here
LTSRF vs MGMNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, MGMNF has a market cap of 340.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while MGMNF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas MGMNF's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to MGMNF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to MGMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check MGMNF's competition here
LTSRF vs ERLFF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ERLFF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -31.36. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ERLFF's competition here
LTSRF vs SVMLF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SVMLF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SVMLF's competition here
LTSRF vs GTRIF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, GTRIF has a market cap of 313.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while GTRIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas GTRIF's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to GTRIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is less volatile compared to GTRIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check GTRIF's competition here
LTSRF vs ERDCF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ERDCF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -42.72. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ERDCF's competition here
LTSRF vs PRMNF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, PRMNF has a market cap of 309.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while PRMNF trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas PRMNF's P/E ratio is -23.20. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to PRMNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to PRMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check PRMNF's competition here
LTSRF vs RTLGF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, RTLGF has a market cap of 303.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while RTLGF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas RTLGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to RTLGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to RTLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check RTLGF's competition here
LTSRF vs SRHYY Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, SRHYY has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while SRHYY trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas SRHYY's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to SRHYY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to SRHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check SRHYY's competition here
LTSRF vs ARAFF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 280.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while ARAFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to ARAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check ARAFF's competition here
LTSRF vs TLOFF Comparison August 2025
LTSRF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTSRF stands at 284.6M. In comparison, TLOFF has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LTSRF is priced at $0.12, while TLOFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTSRF currently has a P/E ratio of -12.00, whereas TLOFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LTSRF's ROE is -0.30%, compared to TLOFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTSRF is more volatile compared to TLOFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTSRF.Check TLOFF's competition here