Luokung Technology Corp.
Luokung Technology Corp. LKCO Peers
See (LKCO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LKCO | $0.81 | +0.00% | 10.7M | N/A | -$647.12 | N/A |
| GOOG | $179.76 | +1.61% | 2.2T | 20.08 | $8.95 | +0.45% |
| GOOGL | $178.64 | +1.59% | 2.2T | 19.93 | $8.96 | +0.45% |
| META | $713.57 | -0.79% | 1.8T | 27.89 | $25.59 | +0.29% |
| SPOT | $709.50 | -1.78% | 142.4B | 110.09 | $6.44 | N/A |
| DASH | $238.80 | +0.33% | 101.2B | 302.35 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| TME | $19.17 | -0.36% | 29.9B | 22.56 | $0.85 | +0.94% |
| BIDU | $86.44 | +0.46% | 29.9B | 8.55 | $10.11 | N/A |
| RDDT | $159.34 | +4.67% | 29.4B | 31.88 | $5.00 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LKCO vs GOOG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GOOG trades at $179.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GOOGL Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GOOGL trades at $178.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs META Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while META trades at $713.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.89. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SPOT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SPOT trades at $709.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 110.09. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs DASH Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while DASH trades at $238.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 302.35. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TWTR Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TME Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TME trades at $19.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs BIDU Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while BIDU trades at $86.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs RDDT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while RDDT trades at $159.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs PINS Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while PINS trades at $35.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TWLO Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TWLO trades at $116.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -485.33. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs Z Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while Z trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -202.86. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ZG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ZG trades at $68.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -196.94. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SNAP Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SNAP trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.25. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs YNDX Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs NBIS Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while NBIS trades at $49.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -30.27. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs MTCH Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while MTCH trades at $32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs DJT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while DJT trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs DJTWW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while DJTWW trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs IACVV Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs CARG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while CARG trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.92. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs IAC Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while IAC trades at $39.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs JOYY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while JOYY trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.49. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs WB Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while WB trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GENI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GENI trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -51.32. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs YELP Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while YELP trades at $35.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs YY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs DOYU Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while DOYU trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs NN Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while NN trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.31. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TBLAW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TBLAW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GRPN Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GRPN trades at $35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -35.08. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ANGIV Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs MOMO Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while MOMO trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TBLA Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TBLA trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 90.63. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs FVRR Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while FVRR trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 60.63. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs JFIN Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 927M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while JFIN trades at $17.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs OPRA Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 898.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while OPRA trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs EVER Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while EVER trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.27. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs NNAVW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 847.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while NNAVW trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ATHM Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 798.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ATHM trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ANGI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 785.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ANGI trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GETY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 711.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GETY trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SMWB Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 703.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SMWB trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -38.60. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs MAX Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 703M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while MAX trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 35.93. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SSTK Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SSTK trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs KIND Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 608.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while KIND trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs THRY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 549.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while THRY trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs PERI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 494.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while PERI trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -61.00. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TTGT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 494.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TTGT trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ZH Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 377.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ZH trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -137.33. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs AREN Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while AREN trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs UPXI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 276M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while UPXI trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TRVG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TRVG trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs OB Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SEAT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SEAT trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -62.67. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TRUE Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TRUE trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ILLRW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ILLR Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 130.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ILLR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs BZFD Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while BZFD trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs PODC Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 75.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while PODC trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -11.12. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ASST Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ASST trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs CCG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while CCG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs BODY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ZDGE Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ZDGE trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -31.08. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs MNY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while MNY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs IZEA Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while IZEA trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GIFT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GIFT trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs EGLX Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs BODI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while BODI trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs NAMI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while NAMI trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SOGP Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SOGP trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SCOR Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SCOR trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LTRPA Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LTRPB Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SEATW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SEATW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LCFYW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LCFYW trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -162.34. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LYL Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs HRYU Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LIZI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs FAZE Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs KRKR Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while KRKR trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LCFY Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LCFY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs QTT Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs LOV Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ONFO Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ONFO trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SLE Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SLE trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ROI Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs CRTD Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while CRTD trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs CMCM Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while CMCM trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs TC Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while TC trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs MNYWW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while MNYWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs STBX Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs FAZEW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs ONFOW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 743.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SLGG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs FENG Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 262.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while FENG trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GROM Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs GROMW Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.
LKCO vs SOGO Comparison
LKCO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LKCO stands at 10.7M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LKCO is priced at $0.81, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LKCO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LKCO's ROE is +3.12%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LKCO is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LKCO.