Locafy Limited

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GOOGL trades at $173.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GOOG trades at $174.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while META trades at $697.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SPOT trades at $712.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 112.37. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while DASH trades at $218.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 276.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while BIDU trades at $85.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TME trades at $17.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while PINS trades at $34.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while RDDT trades at $121.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TWLO trades at $121.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -529.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ZG trades at $69.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -198.31. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while Z trades at $70.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -200.83. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SNAP trades at $8.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.68. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while NBIS trades at $48.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -24.89. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while MTCH trades at $31.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while DJT trades at $20.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while DJTWW trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while CARG trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.46. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while IAC trades at $35.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while WB trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while YELP trades at $36.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GENI trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -49.87. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while DOYU trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while NN trades at $11.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GRPN trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -32.94. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TBLAW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while MOMO trades at $7.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while FVRR trades at $33.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TBLA trades at $3.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while JFIN trades at $18.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 917.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while EVER trades at $25.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 849.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while OPRA trades at $18.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 791.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ANGI trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 765.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ATHM trades at $25.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 713.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while MAX trades at $10.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GETY trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 654.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SMWB trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -35.91. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while NNAVW trades at $4.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 621.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SSTK trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 621.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while KIND trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 594.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while THRY trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TTGT trades at $7.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while PERI trades at $10.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -60.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 425M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while UPXI trades at $11.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ZH trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -133.80. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TRVG trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while OB trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while AREN trades at $5.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SEAT trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -57.33. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ILLRW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ILLR trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while JOYY trades at $47.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TRUE trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ASST trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while BZFD trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while CCG trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while PODC trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GIFT trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while IZEA trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while NAMI trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ZDGE trades at $2.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while MNY trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while BODI trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SEATW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SCOR trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while KRKR trades at $5.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while LCFY trades at $3.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ONFO trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while CRTD trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SLE trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while CMCM trades at $4.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while TC trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 569.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while ONFOW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 234K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while FENG trades at $2.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while SOGP trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.

LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 16.3M. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $12.00, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -155.84, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.