Locafy Limited
Locafy Limited (LCFYW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCFYW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCFYW | $10.83 | -12.87% | 12.5M | -117.01 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| GOOG | $194.08 | +0.46% | 2.3T | 20.67 | $9.39 | +0.42% |
| GOOGL | $193.18 | +0.53% | 2.3T | 20.59 | $9.38 | +0.42% |
| META | $712.68 | -0.30% | 1.8T | 27.86 | $25.59 | +0.29% |
| SPOT | $693.10 | +1.71% | 139.3B | 105.99 | $6.54 | N/A |
| DASH | $249.92 | +2.56% | 105.9B | 316.35 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| TME | $21.30 | +0.33% | 32.4B | 25.06 | $0.85 | +0.85% |
| BIDU | $90.80 | -0.21% | 31.5B | 8.96 | $10.13 | N/A |
| RDDT | $149.66 | +1.03% | 27.6B | 29.98 | $4.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LCFYW vs GOOG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GOOG trades at $194.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GOOG's competition here
LCFYW vs GOOGL Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GOOGL trades at $193.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GOOGL's competition here
LCFYW vs META Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while META trades at $712.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check META's competition here
LCFYW vs SPOT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 139.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SPOT trades at $693.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 105.99. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SPOT's competition here
LCFYW vs DASH Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 105.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while DASH trades at $249.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 316.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check DASH's competition here
LCFYW vs TWTR Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TWTR's competition here
LCFYW vs TME Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TME trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TME's competition here
LCFYW vs BIDU Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while BIDU trades at $90.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check BIDU's competition here
LCFYW vs RDDT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while RDDT trades at $149.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 29.98. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check RDDT's competition here
LCFYW vs PINS Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while PINS trades at $37.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.93. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check PINS's competition here
LCFYW vs TWLO Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TWLO trades at $131.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -595.77. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TWLO's competition here
LCFYW vs ZG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ZG trades at $78.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -223.31. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ZG's competition here
LCFYW vs Z Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while Z trades at $81.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -231.89. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check Z's competition here
LCFYW vs SNAP Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SNAP trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SNAP's competition here
LCFYW vs YNDX Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check YNDX's competition here
LCFYW vs NBIS Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while NBIS trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.13. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check NBIS's competition here
LCFYW vs MTCH Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while MTCH trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check MTCH's competition here
LCFYW vs DJT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while DJT trades at $19.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check DJT's competition here
LCFYW vs DJTWW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while DJTWW trades at $11.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -25.67. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check DJTWW's competition here
LCFYW vs IACVV Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check IACVV's competition here
LCFYW vs CARG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while CARG trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 90.57. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check CARG's competition here
LCFYW vs IAC Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while IAC trades at $40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check IAC's competition here
LCFYW vs JOYY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while JOYY trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.62. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check JOYY's competition here
LCFYW vs WB Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while WB trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check WB's competition here
LCFYW vs DOYU Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while DOYU trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check DOYU's competition here
LCFYW vs GENI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GENI trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -55.97. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GENI's competition here
LCFYW vs YELP Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while YELP trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check YELP's competition here
LCFYW vs YY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check YY's competition here
LCFYW vs NN Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while NN trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -15.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check NN's competition here
LCFYW vs MOMO Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while MOMO trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check MOMO's competition here
LCFYW vs ANGIV Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ANGIV's competition here
LCFYW vs GRPN Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GRPN trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -32.94. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GRPN's competition here
LCFYW vs TBLAW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TBLAW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TBLAW's competition here
LCFYW vs TBLA Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TBLA trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 83.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TBLA's competition here
LCFYW vs EVER Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 929.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while EVER trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.72. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check EVER's competition here
LCFYW vs FVRR Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 925.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while FVRR trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 53.71. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check FVRR's competition here
LCFYW vs NNAVW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 839.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while NNAVW trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check NNAVW's competition here
LCFYW vs ATHM Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 833M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ATHM trades at $28.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ATHM's competition here
LCFYW vs ANGI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 813.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ANGI trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ANGI's competition here
LCFYW vs JFIN Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 793.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while JFIN trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check JFIN's competition here
LCFYW vs OPRA Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 769.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while OPRA trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check OPRA's competition here
LCFYW vs GETY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 765.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GETY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GETY's competition here
LCFYW vs MAX Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 734.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while MAX trades at $10.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.55. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check MAX's competition here
LCFYW vs KIND Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while KIND trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check KIND's competition here
LCFYW vs SMWB Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 714.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SMWB trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -39.23. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SMWB's competition here
LCFYW vs SSTK Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 710.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SSTK trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SSTK's competition here
LCFYW vs TTGT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 612.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TTGT trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TTGT's competition here
LCFYW vs THRY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 520.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while THRY trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.84. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check THRY's competition here
LCFYW vs PERI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 497.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while PERI trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -61.39. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check PERI's competition here
LCFYW vs ZH Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 413M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ZH trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -150.33. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ZH's competition here
LCFYW vs UPXI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 328.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while UPXI trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check UPXI's competition here
LCFYW vs AREN Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 291.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while AREN trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check AREN's competition here
LCFYW vs TRVG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TRVG trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TRVG's competition here
LCFYW vs OB Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check OB's competition here
LCFYW vs SEAT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SEAT trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -56.67. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SEAT's competition here
LCFYW vs TRUE Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 171.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TRUE trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TRUE's competition here
LCFYW vs ILLRW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ILLRW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ILLRW's competition here
LCFYW vs ILLR Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 114.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ILLR trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ILLR's competition here
LCFYW vs MNY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while MNY trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check MNY's competition here
LCFYW vs BZFD Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 88.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while BZFD trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check BZFD's competition here
LCFYW vs IZEA Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while IZEA trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check IZEA's competition here
LCFYW vs ASST Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ASST trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ASST's competition here
LCFYW vs CCG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while CCG trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check CCG's competition here
LCFYW vs ZDGE Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ZDGE trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -32.92. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ZDGE's competition here
LCFYW vs BODY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check BODY's competition here
LCFYW vs PODC Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 50.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while PODC trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check PODC's competition here
LCFYW vs EGLX Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check EGLX's competition here
LCFYW vs BODI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while BODI trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check BODI's competition here
LCFYW vs GIFT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GIFT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GIFT's competition here
LCFYW vs SCOR Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SCOR trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SCOR's competition here
LCFYW vs NAMI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while NAMI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check NAMI's competition here
LCFYW vs SOGP Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SOGP trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SOGP's competition here
LCFYW vs SEATW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SEATW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SEATW's competition here
LCFYW vs LTRPA Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LTRPA's competition here
LCFYW vs LTRPB Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LTRPB's competition here
LCFYW vs LYL Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LYL's competition here
LCFYW vs HRYU Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check HRYU's competition here
LCFYW vs LIZI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LIZI's competition here
LCFYW vs FAZEW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check FAZEW's competition here
LCFYW vs FAZE Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check FAZE's competition here
LCFYW vs LKCO Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LKCO's competition here
LCFYW vs LCFY Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LCFY trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LCFY's competition here
LCFYW vs KRKR Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while KRKR trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check KRKR's competition here
LCFYW vs ONFO Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ONFO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ONFO's competition here
LCFYW vs QTT Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check QTT's competition here
LCFYW vs LOV Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check LOV's competition here
LCFYW vs SLE Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SLE trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SLE's competition here
LCFYW vs MNYWW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while MNYWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check MNYWW's competition here
LCFYW vs ROI Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ROI's competition here
LCFYW vs CMCM Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while CMCM trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check CMCM's competition here
LCFYW vs CRTD Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while CRTD trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check CRTD's competition here
LCFYW vs TC Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while TC trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check TC's competition here
LCFYW vs STBX Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check STBX's competition here
LCFYW vs ONFOW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 665K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while ONFOW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check ONFOW's competition here
LCFYW vs SLGG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SLGG's competition here
LCFYW vs FENG Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 257.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while FENG trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check FENG's competition here
LCFYW vs GROM Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GROM's competition here
LCFYW vs GROMW Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check GROMW's competition here
LCFYW vs SOGO Comparison July 2025
LCFYW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCFYW stands at 12.5M. In comparison, SOGO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCFYW is priced at $10.83, while SOGO trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCFYW currently has a P/E ratio of -117.01, whereas SOGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFYW's ROE is -0.43%, compared to SOGO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFYW is more volatile compared to SOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFYW.Check SOGO's competition here