Locafy Limited

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GOOGL trades at $177.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GOOG trades at $178.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while META trades at $741.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SPOT trades at $765.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 120.01. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while DASH trades at $243.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 306.73. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while BIDU trades at $85.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TME trades at $19.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while RDDT trades at $151.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while PINS trades at $35.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TWLO trades at $123.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -511.79. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ZG trades at $67.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -194.86. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while Z trades at $69.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -199.26. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SNAP trades at $8.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -28.15. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while NBIS trades at $54.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while MTCH trades at $30.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while DJTWW trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -25.91. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while DJT trades at $17.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while CARG trades at $33.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 89.89. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while IAC trades at $37.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while JOYY trades at $50.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.52. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GENI trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -54.74. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while WB trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while YELP trades at $34.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while NN trades at $15.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while DOYU trades at $6.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GRPN trades at $33.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -34.45. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while MOMO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TBLA trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 90.75. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TBLAW trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while FVRR trades at $29.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 59.96. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 876.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while EVER trades at $24.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 827M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while OPRA trades at $18.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 824.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while NNAVW trades at $6.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 822.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while JFIN trades at $16.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 783.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ATHM trades at $25.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 756.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ANGI trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 730M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while MAX trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 711.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GETY trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 663.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SSTK trades at $18.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 627.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SMWB trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -34.45. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 610.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while KIND trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 521.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while THRY trades at $11.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -4.85. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 501.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TTGT trades at $7.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 454.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while PERI trades at $10.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -56.11. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ZH trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -131.17. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 291.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while AREN trades at $6.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TRVG trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.02. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while UPXI trades at $2.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SEAT trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -53.33. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 172.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TRUE trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ILLRW has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ILLRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ILLRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ILLRW's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ILLRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 124.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ILLR trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while BZFD trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 66.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while CCG trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ASST trades at $3.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while PODC trades at $2.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ZDGE trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GIFT trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while IZEA trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while MNY trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while NAMI trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while BODI trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SCOR trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SOGP trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SEATW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LCFYW trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -131.95. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while KRKR trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ONFO trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while CRTD trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SLE trades at $4.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while CMCM trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while TC trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while MNYWW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 615.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while ONFOW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 240.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while FENG trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.

LCFY plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LCFY stands at 11.3M. In comparison, PCOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCFY is priced at $5.55, while PCOM trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LCFY currently has a P/E ratio of -7.34, whereas PCOM's P/E ratio is 166.60. In terms of profitability, LCFY's ROE is -0.59%, compared to PCOM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCFY is more volatile compared to PCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCFY.