Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KXS.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KXS.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KXS.TO | CA$187.59 | -3.05% | 5.1B | 30.21 | CA$6.21 | N/A |
| SHOP.TO | CA$239.71 | -5.08% | 311.1B | 107.82 | CA$2.22 | N/A |
| CRM.NE | CA$18.28 | -1.93% | 294.1B | 1.24 | CA$14.80 | +0.73% |
| ADBE.NE | CA$9.30 | -2.92% | 133.4B | 12.81 | CA$0.73 | N/A |
| ADBE.TO | CA$9.35 | -2.40% | 124.7B | 13.27 | CA$0.70 | N/A |
| CSU.TO | CA$3,185.80 | -2.98% | 67.5B | 25.34 | CA$125.73 | +0.18% |
| UBER.TO | CA$10.26 | -1.44% | 21B | 1.61 | CA$6.38 | N/A |
| SAPS.TO | CA$17.80 | -0.89% | 20.5B | 1.60 | CA$11.12 | N/A |
| NOWS.TO | CA$17.99 | -4.61% | 18.6B | 8.08 | CA$2.23 | N/A |
| CRM.TO | CA$18.28 | -2.40% | 15B | 1.20 | CA$15.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Shopify Inc. (TSX: SHOP.TO)
KXS.TO vs SHOP.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SHOP.TO has a market cap of 311.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SHOP.TO trades at CA$239.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SHOP.TO's P/E ratio is 107.82. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SHOP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to SHOP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SHOP.TO's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (NEO: CRM.NE)
KXS.TO vs CRM.NE Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRM.NE has a market cap of 294.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while CRM.NE trades at CA$18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas CRM.NE's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to CRM.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check CRM.NE's competition here
Adobe Inc. (NEO: ADBE.NE)
KXS.TO vs ADBE.NE Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ADBE.NE has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ADBE.NE trades at CA$9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ADBE.NE's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBE.NE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ADBE.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ADBE.NE's competition here
Adobe Inc. (TSX: ADBE.TO)
KXS.TO vs ADBE.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ADBE.TO has a market cap of 124.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ADBE.TO trades at CA$9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ADBE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADBE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ADBE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ADBE.TO's competition here
Constellation Software Inc. (TSX: CSU.TO)
KXS.TO vs CSU.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while CSU.TO trades at CA$3,185.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check CSU.TO's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (TSX: UBER.TO)
KXS.TO vs UBER.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, UBER.TO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while UBER.TO trades at CA$10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas UBER.TO's P/E ratio is 1.61. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UBER.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to UBER.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check UBER.TO's competition here
Sap Se (TSX: SAPS.TO)
KXS.TO vs SAPS.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SAPS.TO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SAPS.TO trades at CA$17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SAPS.TO's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAPS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to SAPS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SAPS.TO's competition here
ServiceNow, Inc. (TSX: NOWS.TO)
KXS.TO vs NOWS.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NOWS.TO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while NOWS.TO trades at CA$17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas NOWS.TO's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOWS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to NOWS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check NOWS.TO's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (TSX: CRM.TO)
KXS.TO vs CRM.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRM.TO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while CRM.TO trades at CA$18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas CRM.TO's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to CRM.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check CRM.TO's competition here
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (TSX: DSG.TO)
KXS.TO vs DSG.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while DSG.TO trades at CA$123.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check DSG.TO's competition here
Open Text Corporation (TSX: OTEX.TO)
KXS.TO vs OTEX.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while OTEX.TO trades at CA$36.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check OTEX.TO's competition here
Intuit Inc. (TSX: INTU.TO)
KXS.TO vs INTU.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, INTU.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while INTU.TO trades at CA$19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas INTU.TO's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTU.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to INTU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check INTU.TO's competition here
Strategy Inc (TSX: MSTR.TO)
KXS.TO vs MSTR.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MSTR.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while MSTR.TO trades at CA$9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas MSTR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MSTR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to MSTR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check MSTR.TO's competition here
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO)
KXS.TO vs APPS.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, APPS.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while APPS.TO trades at CA$8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas APPS.TO's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APPS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to APPS.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check APPS.TO's competition here
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (TSX: LSPD.TO)
KXS.TO vs LSPD.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LSPD.TO trades at CA$14.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -560.34. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LSPD.TO's competition here
Magnet Forensics Inc. (TSX: MAGT.TO)
KXS.TO vs MAGT.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while MAGT.TO trades at CA$44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check MAGT.TO's competition here
Abaxx Technologies Inc. (NEO: ABXX.NE)
KXS.TO vs ABXX.NE Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ABXX.NE trades at CA$27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ABXX.NE's competition here
Docebo Inc. (TSX: DCBO.TO)
KXS.TO vs DCBO.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 975.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while DCBO.TO trades at CA$39.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check DCBO.TO's competition here
Enghouse Systems Limited (TSX: ENGH.TO)
KXS.TO vs ENGH.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 958.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ENGH.TO trades at CA$17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ENGH.TO's competition here
Absolute Software Corporation (TSX: ABST.TO)
KXS.TO vs ABST.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ABST.TO trades at CA$15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ABST.TO's competition here
Blackline Safety Corp. (TSX: BLN.TO)
KXS.TO vs BLN.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BLN.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -76.63. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BLN.TO's competition here
Abaxx Technologies Inc (TSX: ABXX.TO)
KXS.TO vs ABXX.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ABXX.TO has a market cap of 598.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ABXX.TO trades at CA$15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ABXX.TO's P/E ratio is -8.29. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABXX.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to ABXX.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ABXX.TO's competition here
D2L Inc. (TSX: DTOL.TO)
KXS.TO vs DTOL.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DTOL.TO has a market cap of 583.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while DTOL.TO trades at CA$11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas DTOL.TO's P/E ratio is 380.95. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTOL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to DTOL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check DTOL.TO's competition here
Tecsys Inc. (TSX: TCS.TO)
KXS.TO vs TCS.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 547M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TCS.TO trades at CA$37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 88.85. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TCS.TO's competition here
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (TSX: CMG.TO)
KXS.TO vs CMG.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while CMG.TO trades at CA$4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check CMG.TO's competition here
Q4 Inc. (TSX: QFOR.TO)
KXS.TO vs QFOR.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while QFOR.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check QFOR.TO's competition here
WonderFi Technologies Inc. (TSX: WNDR.TO)
KXS.TO vs WNDR.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while WNDR.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check WNDR.TO's competition here
E Automotive Inc. (TSX: EINC.TO)
KXS.TO vs EINC.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while EINC.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check EINC.TO's competition here
NameSilo Technologies Corp. (CNQ: URL.CN)
KXS.TO vs URL.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while URL.CN trades at CA$1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to URL.CN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check URL.CN's competition here
Thinkific Labs Inc. (TSX: THNC.TO)
KXS.TO vs THNC.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while THNC.TO trades at CA$2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is -85.90. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check THNC.TO's competition here
Xtract One Technologies Inc. (TSX: XTRA.TO)
KXS.TO vs XTRA.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while XTRA.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check XTRA.TO's competition here
Dye & Durham Limited (TSX: DND.TO)
KXS.TO vs DND.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 129M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while DND.TO trades at CA$1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check DND.TO's competition here
MediaValet Inc. (TSX: MVP.TO)
KXS.TO vs MVP.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while MVP.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check MVP.TO's competition here
Sylogist Ltd. (TSX: SYZ.TO)
KXS.TO vs SYZ.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SYZ.TO trades at CA$2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SYZ.TO's competition here
Intermap Technologies Corporation (TSX: IMP.TO)
KXS.TO vs IMP.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while IMP.TO trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check IMP.TO's competition here
Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (TSX: BRAG.TO)
KXS.TO vs BRAG.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BRAG.TO has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BRAG.TO trades at CA$1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BRAG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BRAG.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to BRAG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BRAG.TO's competition here
VerticalScope Holdings Inc. (TSX: FORA.TO)
KXS.TO vs FORA.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FORA.TO has a market cap of 52M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while FORA.TO trades at CA$2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas FORA.TO's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORA.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to FORA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check FORA.TO's competition here
Tony G Co-Investment Holdings Ltd. (CNQ: TONY.CN)
KXS.TO vs TONY.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TONY.CN trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of +33.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TONY.CN's competition here
Logiq, Inc. (NEO: LGIQ.NE)
KXS.TO vs LGIQ.NE Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LGIQ.NE trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LGIQ.NE's competition here
Two Hands Corporation (CNQ: TWOH.CN)
KXS.TO vs TWOH.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TWOH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to TWOH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TWOH.CN's competition here
Cryptoblox Technologies Inc. (CNQ: BLOX.CN)
KXS.TO vs BLOX.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BLOX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to BLOX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BLOX.CN's competition here
LifeSpeak Inc. (TSX: LSPK.TO)
KXS.TO vs LSPK.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LSPK.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LSPK.TO's competition here
Blockchain Venture Capital Inc. (CNQ: BVCI.CN)
KXS.TO vs BVCI.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BVCI.CN's competition here
Nextech3D.AI Corporation (CNQ: NTAR.CN)
KXS.TO vs NTAR.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NTAR.CN has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while NTAR.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas NTAR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTAR.CN's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to NTAR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check NTAR.CN's competition here
Bnsellit Technology Inc. (CNQ: BNSL.CN)
KXS.TO vs BNSL.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BNSL.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is not fully comparable compared to BNSL.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BNSL.CN's competition here
Hello Pal International Inc. (CNQ: HP.CN)
KXS.TO vs HP.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while HP.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to HP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check HP.CN's competition here
Farmers Edge Inc. (TSX: FDGE.TO)
KXS.TO vs FDGE.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while FDGE.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to FDGE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check FDGE.TO's competition here
IGEN Networks Corp. (CNQ: IGN.CN)
KXS.TO vs IGN.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while IGN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to IGN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check IGN.CN's competition here
Encore Technologies Corp. (CNQ: ENCR.CN)
KXS.TO vs ENCR.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ENCR.CN has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ENCR.CN trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ENCR.CN's P/E ratio is -47.00. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENCR.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ENCR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ENCR.CN's competition here
SponsorsOne Inc. (CNQ: SPO.CN)
KXS.TO vs SPO.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SPO.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +17.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to SPO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SPO.CN's competition here
VIQ Solutions Inc. (TSX: VQS.TO)
KXS.TO vs VQS.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while VQS.TO trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to VQS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check VQS.TO's competition here
Sekur Private Data Ltd. (CNQ: SKUR.CN)
KXS.TO vs SKUR.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SKUR.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to SKUR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SKUR.CN's competition here
Cloud Nine Web3 Technologies Inc. (CNQ: CNI.CN)
KXS.TO vs CNI.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CNI.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while CNI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas CNI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CNI.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to CNI.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check CNI.CN's competition here
EYEFI Group Technologies Inc. (CNQ: EGTI.CN)
KXS.TO vs EGTI.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while EGTI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to EGTI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check EGTI.CN's competition here
ICEsoft Technologies Canada Corp. (CNQ: ISFT.CN)
KXS.TO vs ISFT.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ISFT.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ISFT.CN's competition here
Adcore Inc. (TSX: ADCO.TO)
KXS.TO vs ADCO.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ADCO.TO trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ADCO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ADCO.TO's competition here
VSBLTY Groupe Technologies Corp. (CNQ: VSBY.CN)
KXS.TO vs VSBY.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while VSBY.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check VSBY.CN's competition here
NorthPalm Capital Corp. (CNQ: NP.CN)
KXS.TO vs NP.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NP.CN has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while NP.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas NP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NP.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to NP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check NP.CN's competition here
Axcap Ventures Inc. (CNQ: AXCP.CN)
KXS.TO vs AXCP.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while AXCP.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check AXCP.CN's competition here
Sprout AI Inc. (CNQ: BYFM.CN)
KXS.TO vs BYFM.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while BYFM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to BYFM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check BYFM.CN's competition here
MetaWorks Platforms, Inc. (CNQ: MWRK.CN)
KXS.TO vs MWRK.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while MWRK.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check MWRK.CN's competition here
Infinitii Ai Inc. (CNQ: IAI.CN)
KXS.TO vs IAI.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while IAI.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -5.26. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to IAI.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check IAI.CN's competition here
Liquid Meta Capital Holdings Ltd. (NEO: LIQD.NE)
KXS.TO vs LIQD.NE Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LIQD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to LIQD.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LIQD.NE's competition here
Xigem Technologies Corporation (CNQ: XIGM.CN)
KXS.TO vs XIGM.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while XIGM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -11.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to XIGM.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check XIGM.CN's competition here
Liquid Avatar Technologies Inc. (CNQ: LQID.CN)
KXS.TO vs LQID.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LQID.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to LQID.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LQID.CN's competition here
Green Block Mining Corp. (CNQ: GBMC.CN)
KXS.TO vs GBMC.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while GBMC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to GBMC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check GBMC.CN's competition here
Arway Corporation (CNQ: ARWY.CN)
KXS.TO vs ARWY.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ARWY.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ARWY.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ARWY.CN's competition here
XRApplied Technologies Inc. (CNQ: XRA.CN)
KXS.TO vs XRA.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while XRA.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check XRA.CN's competition here
Graph Blockchain Inc. (CNQ: GBLC.CN)
KXS.TO vs GBLC.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while GBLC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check GBLC.CN's competition here
Tevano Systems Holdings Inc. (CNQ: TEVO.CN)
KXS.TO vs TEVO.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TEVO.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TEVO.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TEVO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TEVO.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to TEVO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TEVO.CN's competition here
Empatho Holdings Inc. (CNQ: EMPH.CN)
KXS.TO vs EMPH.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while EMPH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to EMPH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check EMPH.CN's competition here
Playground Ventures Inc (CNQ: PLAY-X.CN)
KXS.TO vs PLAY-X.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PLAY-X.CN has a market cap of 844.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while PLAY-X.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas PLAY-X.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLAY-X.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to PLAY-X.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check PLAY-X.CN's competition here
Prospect Park Capital Corp. (CNQ: PPK.CN)
KXS.TO vs PPK.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 828K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while PPK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to PPK.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check PPK.CN's competition here
Fandifi Technology Corp. (CNQ: FDM.CN)
KXS.TO vs FDM.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while FDM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to FDM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check FDM.CN's competition here
Pushfor Tech Inc. (CNQ: PUSH.CN)
KXS.TO vs PUSH.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while PUSH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is not fully comparable compared to PUSH.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check PUSH.CN's competition here
Credissential Inc. (CNQ: WHIP.CN)
KXS.TO vs WHIP.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 798.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while WHIP.CN trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to WHIP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check WHIP.CN's competition here
TruTrace Technologies Inc. (CNQ: TTT.CN)
KXS.TO vs TTT.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TTT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to TTT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TTT.CN's competition here
Solvbl Solutions Inc. (CNQ: SOLV.CN)
KXS.TO vs SOLV.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SOLV.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SOLV.CN's competition here
Infinity Stone Ventures Corp. (CNQ: GEMS.CN)
KXS.TO vs GEMS.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 667.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while GEMS.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to GEMS.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check GEMS.CN's competition here
Danavation Technologies Corp. (CNQ: DVN.CN)
KXS.TO vs DVN.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while DVN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to DVN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check DVN.CN's competition here
Plank Ventures Ltd. (CNQ: PLNK.CN)
KXS.TO vs PLNK.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 443.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while PLNK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of +4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to PLNK.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check PLNK.CN's competition here
ZeU Technologies Inc. (CNQ: ZEU.CN)
KXS.TO vs ZEU.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 426.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while ZEU.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEU.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check ZEU.CN's competition here
CoinAnalyst Corp. (CNQ: COYX.CN)
KXS.TO vs COYX.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while COYX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to COYX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check COYX.CN's competition here
Radial Research Corp. (CNQ: RAD.CN)
KXS.TO vs RAD.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 264.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while RAD.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to RAD.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check RAD.CN's competition here
Green Block Mining Corp. (CNQ: LNK.CN)
KXS.TO vs LNK.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LNK.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LNK.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNK.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is not fully comparable compared to LNK.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LNK.CN's competition here
LifeWorks Inc. (TSX: LWRK.TO)
KXS.TO vs LWRK.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, LWRK.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while LWRK.TO trades at CA$32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas LWRK.TO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LWRK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to LWRK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check LWRK.TO's competition here
Voyager Digital Ltd. (TSX: VOYG.TO)
KXS.TO vs VOYG.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VOYG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while VOYG.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas VOYG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VOYG.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to VOYG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check VOYG.TO's competition here
exactEarth Ltd. (TSX: XCT.TO)
KXS.TO vs XCT.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, XCT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while XCT.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas XCT.TO's P/E ratio is -55.36. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XCT.TO's ROE of +20.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to XCT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check XCT.TO's competition here
NexJ Systems Inc. (TSX: NXJ.TO)
KXS.TO vs NXJ.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NXJ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while NXJ.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas NXJ.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NXJ.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is more volatile compared to NXJ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check NXJ.TO's competition here
GlobeX Data Ltd. (CNQ: SWIS.CN)
KXS.TO vs SWIS.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SWIS.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while SWIS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas SWIS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SWIS.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is not fully comparable compared to SWIS.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check SWIS.CN's competition here
Patriot One Technologies Inc. (TSX: PAT.TO)
KXS.TO vs PAT.TO Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, PAT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while PAT.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas PAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PAT.TO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is less volatile compared to PAT.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check PAT.TO's competition here
TraceSafe Inc. (CNQ: TSF.CN)
KXS.TO vs TSF.CN Comparison October 2026
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KXS.TO stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KXS.TO is priced at CA$187.59 on the TSX, while TSF.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KXS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 30.21, whereas TSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, KXS.TO's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TSF.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KXS.TO is not fully comparable compared to TSF.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KXS.TO.Check TSF.CN's competition here