AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See APPS.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for APPS.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPS.TO | CA$9.67 | -3.97% | 2.9B | 0.52 | CA$18.57 | N/A |
| CRM.NE | CA$18.05 | -2.33% | 290.4B | 1.22 | CA$14.80 | +0.74% |
| SHOP.TO | CA$179.34 | -0.37% | 232.7B | 80.66 | CA$2.22 | N/A |
| ADBE.NE | CA$9.50 | -0.73% | 137.7B | 2.07 | CA$4.63 | N/A |
| ADBE.TO | CA$9.50 | -0.73% | 131.4B | 13.70 | CA$0.70 | N/A |
| CSU.TO | CA$2,843.09 | +0.47% | 60.2B | 22.61 | CA$125.73 | +0.20% |
| UBER.TO | CA$10.33 | -0.48% | 21.1B | 1.62 | CA$6.38 | N/A |
| NOWS.TO | CA$17.20 | -2.27% | 17.8B | 7.73 | CA$2.23 | N/A |
| CRM.TO | CA$18.07 | -2.22% | 14.9B | 1.18 | CA$15.27 | N/A |
| DSG.TO | CA$107.71 | -3.29% | 9.2B | 36.44 | CA$2.96 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Salesforce, Inc. (NEO: CRM.NE)
APPS.TO vs CRM.NE Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRM.NE has a market cap of 290.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while CRM.NE trades at CA$18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas CRM.NE's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CRM.NE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to CRM.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check CRM.NE's competition here
Shopify Inc. (TSX: SHOP.TO)
APPS.TO vs SHOP.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SHOP.TO has a market cap of 232.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SHOP.TO trades at CA$179.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SHOP.TO's P/E ratio is 80.66. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SHOP.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to SHOP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SHOP.TO's competition here
Adobe Inc. (NEO: ADBE.NE)
APPS.TO vs ADBE.NE Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADBE.NE has a market cap of 137.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ADBE.NE trades at CA$9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ADBE.NE's P/E ratio is 2.07. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBE.NE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ADBE.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ADBE.NE's competition here
Adobe Inc. (TSX: ADBE.TO)
APPS.TO vs ADBE.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADBE.TO has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ADBE.TO trades at CA$9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ADBE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ADBE.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ADBE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ADBE.TO's competition here
Constellation Software Inc. (TSX: CSU.TO)
APPS.TO vs CSU.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CSU.TO has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while CSU.TO trades at CA$2,843.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas CSU.TO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CSU.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to CSU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check CSU.TO's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (TSX: UBER.TO)
APPS.TO vs UBER.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UBER.TO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while UBER.TO trades at CA$10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas UBER.TO's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to UBER.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to UBER.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check UBER.TO's competition here
ServiceNow, Inc. (TSX: NOWS.TO)
APPS.TO vs NOWS.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NOWS.TO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while NOWS.TO trades at CA$17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas NOWS.TO's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NOWS.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to NOWS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check NOWS.TO's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (TSX: CRM.TO)
APPS.TO vs CRM.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRM.TO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while CRM.TO trades at CA$18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas CRM.TO's P/E ratio is 1.18. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CRM.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to CRM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check CRM.TO's competition here
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (TSX: DSG.TO)
APPS.TO vs DSG.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSG.TO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while DSG.TO trades at CA$107.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas DSG.TO's P/E ratio is 36.44. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DSG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to DSG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check DSG.TO's competition here
Open Text Corporation (TSX: OTEX.TO)
APPS.TO vs OTEX.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OTEX.TO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while OTEX.TO trades at CA$31.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas OTEX.TO's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to OTEX.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to OTEX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check OTEX.TO's competition here
Kinaxis Inc. (TSX: KXS.TO)
APPS.TO vs KXS.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KXS.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while KXS.TO trades at CA$176.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas KXS.TO's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to KXS.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to KXS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check KXS.TO's competition here
Strategy Inc (TSX: MSTR.TO)
APPS.TO vs MSTR.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MSTR.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while MSTR.TO trades at CA$10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas MSTR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to MSTR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check MSTR.TO's competition here
Magnet Forensics Inc. (TSX: MAGT.TO)
APPS.TO vs MAGT.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MAGT.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while MAGT.TO trades at CA$44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas MAGT.TO's P/E ratio is 368.67. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MAGT.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to MAGT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check MAGT.TO's competition here
Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (TSX: LSPD.TO)
APPS.TO vs LSPD.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LSPD.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LSPD.TO trades at CA$13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LSPD.TO's P/E ratio is -492.88. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LSPD.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to LSPD.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LSPD.TO's competition here
Abaxx Technologies Inc. (NEO: ABXX.NE)
APPS.TO vs ABXX.NE Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABXX.NE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ABXX.NE trades at CA$27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ABXX.NE's P/E ratio is -16.75. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ABXX.NE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ABXX.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ABXX.NE's competition here
Enghouse Systems Limited (TSX: ENGH.TO)
APPS.TO vs ENGH.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENGH.TO has a market cap of 920.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ENGH.TO trades at CA$16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ENGH.TO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ENGH.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ENGH.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ENGH.TO's competition here
Docebo Inc. (TSX: DCBO.TO)
APPS.TO vs DCBO.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DCBO.TO has a market cap of 821.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while DCBO.TO trades at CA$32.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas DCBO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DCBO.TO's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to DCBO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check DCBO.TO's competition here
Absolute Software Corporation (TSX: ABST.TO)
APPS.TO vs ABST.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABST.TO has a market cap of 808M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ABST.TO trades at CA$15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ABST.TO's P/E ratio is -23.03. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ABST.TO's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ABST.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ABST.TO's competition here
Blackline Safety Corp. (TSX: BLN.TO)
APPS.TO vs BLN.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLN.TO has a market cap of 772.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BLN.TO trades at CA$9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BLN.TO's P/E ratio is -76.63. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BLN.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to BLN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BLN.TO's competition here
Abaxx Technologies Inc (TSX: ABXX.TO)
APPS.TO vs ABXX.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABXX.TO has a market cap of 686M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ABXX.TO trades at CA$17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ABXX.TO's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ABXX.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ABXX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ABXX.TO's competition here
D2L Inc. (TSX: DTOL.TO)
APPS.TO vs DTOL.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DTOL.TO has a market cap of 556.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while DTOL.TO trades at CA$10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas DTOL.TO's P/E ratio is 348.41. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DTOL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to DTOL.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check DTOL.TO's competition here
Tecsys Inc. (TSX: TCS.TO)
APPS.TO vs TCS.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TCS.TO has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TCS.TO trades at CA$35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TCS.TO's P/E ratio is 84.16. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TCS.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to TCS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TCS.TO's competition here
Computer Modelling Group Ltd. (TSX: CMG.TO)
APPS.TO vs CMG.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CMG.TO has a market cap of 312M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while CMG.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas CMG.TO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CMG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to CMG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check CMG.TO's competition here
Q4 Inc. (TSX: QFOR.TO)
APPS.TO vs QFOR.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QFOR.TO has a market cap of 242.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while QFOR.TO trades at CA$6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas QFOR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to QFOR.TO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to QFOR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check QFOR.TO's competition here
WonderFi Technologies Inc. (TSX: WNDR.TO)
APPS.TO vs WNDR.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WNDR.TO has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while WNDR.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas WNDR.TO's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to WNDR.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to WNDR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check WNDR.TO's competition here
E Automotive Inc. (TSX: EINC.TO)
APPS.TO vs EINC.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EINC.TO has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while EINC.TO trades at CA$3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas EINC.TO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EINC.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to EINC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check EINC.TO's competition here
Xtract One Technologies Inc. (TSX: XTRA.TO)
APPS.TO vs XTRA.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XTRA.TO has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while XTRA.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas XTRA.TO's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XTRA.TO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to XTRA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check XTRA.TO's competition here
NameSilo Technologies Corp. (CNQ: URL.CN)
APPS.TO vs URL.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, URL.CN has a market cap of 137.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while URL.CN trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas URL.CN's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to URL.CN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to URL.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check URL.CN's competition here
Thinkific Labs Inc. (TSX: THNC.TO)
APPS.TO vs THNC.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, THNC.TO has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while THNC.TO trades at CA$1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas THNC.TO's P/E ratio is -49.43. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to THNC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to THNC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check THNC.TO's competition here
MediaValet Inc. (TSX: MVP.TO)
APPS.TO vs MVP.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MVP.TO has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while MVP.TO trades at CA$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas MVP.TO's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MVP.TO's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to MVP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check MVP.TO's competition here
Sylogist Ltd. (TSX: SYZ.TO)
APPS.TO vs SYZ.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SYZ.TO has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SYZ.TO trades at CA$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SYZ.TO's P/E ratio is -8.17. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SYZ.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to SYZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SYZ.TO's competition here
Intermap Technologies Corporation (TSX: IMP.TO)
APPS.TO vs IMP.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMP.TO has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while IMP.TO trades at CA$0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas IMP.TO's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IMP.TO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to IMP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check IMP.TO's competition here
Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (TSX: BRAG.TO)
APPS.TO vs BRAG.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRAG.TO has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BRAG.TO trades at CA$2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BRAG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BRAG.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to BRAG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BRAG.TO's competition here
VerticalScope Holdings Inc. (TSX: FORA.TO)
APPS.TO vs FORA.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FORA.TO has a market cap of 54.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while FORA.TO trades at CA$2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas FORA.TO's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FORA.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to FORA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check FORA.TO's competition here
Tony G Co-Investment Holdings Ltd. (CNQ: TONY.CN)
APPS.TO vs TONY.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TONY.CN has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TONY.CN trades at CA$3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TONY.CN's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TONY.CN's ROE of +33.52%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to TONY.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TONY.CN's competition here
Dye & Durham Limited (TSX: DND.TO)
APPS.TO vs DND.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DND.TO has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while DND.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas DND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DND.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to DND.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check DND.TO's competition here
Logiq, Inc. (NEO: LGIQ.NE)
APPS.TO vs LGIQ.NE Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGIQ.NE has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LGIQ.NE trades at CA$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LGIQ.NE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LGIQ.NE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to LGIQ.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LGIQ.NE's competition here
Two Hands Corporation (CNQ: TWOH.CN)
APPS.TO vs TWOH.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TWOH.CN has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TWOH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TWOH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TWOH.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to TWOH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TWOH.CN's competition here
Cryptoblox Technologies Inc. (CNQ: BLOX.CN)
APPS.TO vs BLOX.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BLOX.CN has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BLOX.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BLOX.CN's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BLOX.CN's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to BLOX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BLOX.CN's competition here
Nextech3D.AI Corporation (CNQ: NTAR.CN)
APPS.TO vs NTAR.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTAR.CN has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while NTAR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas NTAR.CN's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NTAR.CN's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to NTAR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check NTAR.CN's competition here
LifeSpeak Inc. (TSX: LSPK.TO)
APPS.TO vs LSPK.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LSPK.TO has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LSPK.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LSPK.TO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LSPK.TO's ROE of -4.38%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to LSPK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LSPK.TO's competition here
Blockchain Venture Capital Inc. (CNQ: BVCI.CN)
APPS.TO vs BVCI.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BVCI.CN has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BVCI.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BVCI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BVCI.CN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to BVCI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BVCI.CN's competition here
Bnsellit Technology Inc. (CNQ: BNSL.CN)
APPS.TO vs BNSL.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BNSL.CN has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BNSL.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BNSL.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BNSL.CN's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is not fully comparable compared to BNSL.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BNSL.CN's competition here
Hello Pal International Inc. (CNQ: HP.CN)
APPS.TO vs HP.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HP.CN has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while HP.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas HP.CN's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to HP.CN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to HP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check HP.CN's competition here
Farmers Edge Inc. (TSX: FDGE.TO)
APPS.TO vs FDGE.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FDGE.TO has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while FDGE.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas FDGE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FDGE.TO's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to FDGE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check FDGE.TO's competition here
IGEN Networks Corp. (CNQ: IGN.CN)
APPS.TO vs IGN.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IGN.CN has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while IGN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas IGN.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IGN.CN's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to IGN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check IGN.CN's competition here
Sekur Private Data Ltd. (CNQ: SKUR.CN)
APPS.TO vs SKUR.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKUR.CN has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SKUR.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SKUR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SKUR.CN's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to SKUR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SKUR.CN's competition here
SponsorsOne Inc. (CNQ: SPO.CN)
APPS.TO vs SPO.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPO.CN has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SPO.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SPO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SPO.CN's ROE of +17.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to SPO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SPO.CN's competition here
VIQ Solutions Inc. (TSX: VQS.TO)
APPS.TO vs VQS.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VQS.TO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while VQS.TO trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas VQS.TO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VQS.TO's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to VQS.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check VQS.TO's competition here
Encore Technologies Corp. (CNQ: ENCR.CN)
APPS.TO vs ENCR.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENCR.CN has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ENCR.CN trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ENCR.CN's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ENCR.CN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ENCR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ENCR.CN's competition here
Cloud Nine Web3 Technologies Inc. (CNQ: CNI.CN)
APPS.TO vs CNI.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CNI.CN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while CNI.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas CNI.CN's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to CNI.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to CNI.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check CNI.CN's competition here
EYEFI Group Technologies Inc. (CNQ: EGTI.CN)
APPS.TO vs EGTI.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EGTI.CN has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while EGTI.CN trades at CA$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas EGTI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EGTI.CN's ROE of +13.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to EGTI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check EGTI.CN's competition here
Adcore Inc. (TSX: ADCO.TO)
APPS.TO vs ADCO.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ADCO.TO has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ADCO.TO trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ADCO.TO's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ADCO.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ADCO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ADCO.TO's competition here
ICEsoft Technologies Canada Corp. (CNQ: ISFT.CN)
APPS.TO vs ISFT.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ISFT.CN has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ISFT.CN trades at CA$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ISFT.CN's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ISFT.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ISFT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ISFT.CN's competition here
VSBLTY Groupe Technologies Corp. (CNQ: VSBY.CN)
APPS.TO vs VSBY.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VSBY.CN has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while VSBY.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas VSBY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VSBY.CN's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to VSBY.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check VSBY.CN's competition here
NorthPalm Capital Corp. (CNQ: NP.CN)
APPS.TO vs NP.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NP.CN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while NP.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas NP.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NP.CN's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to NP.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check NP.CN's competition here
Axcap Ventures Inc. (CNQ: AXCP.CN)
APPS.TO vs AXCP.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXCP.CN has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while AXCP.CN trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas AXCP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to AXCP.CN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to AXCP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check AXCP.CN's competition here
Infinitii Ai Inc. (CNQ: IAI.CN)
APPS.TO vs IAI.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IAI.CN has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while IAI.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas IAI.CN's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to IAI.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to IAI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check IAI.CN's competition here
Sprout AI Inc. (CNQ: BYFM.CN)
APPS.TO vs BYFM.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BYFM.CN has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while BYFM.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas BYFM.CN's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to BYFM.CN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to BYFM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check BYFM.CN's competition here
MetaWorks Platforms, Inc. (CNQ: MWRK.CN)
APPS.TO vs MWRK.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MWRK.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while MWRK.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas MWRK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to MWRK.CN's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to MWRK.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check MWRK.CN's competition here
Liquid Meta Capital Holdings Ltd. (NEO: LIQD.NE)
APPS.TO vs LIQD.NE Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LIQD.NE has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LIQD.NE trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LIQD.NE's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LIQD.NE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to LIQD.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LIQD.NE's competition here
Liquid Avatar Technologies Inc. (CNQ: LQID.CN)
APPS.TO vs LQID.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LQID.CN has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LQID.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LQID.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LQID.CN's ROE of -5.90%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to LQID.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LQID.CN's competition here
Green Block Mining Corp. (CNQ: GBMC.CN)
APPS.TO vs GBMC.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GBMC.CN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while GBMC.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas GBMC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GBMC.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to GBMC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check GBMC.CN's competition here
XRApplied Technologies Inc. (CNQ: XRA.CN)
APPS.TO vs XRA.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XRA.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while XRA.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas XRA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XRA.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to XRA.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check XRA.CN's competition here
Graph Blockchain Inc. (CNQ: GBLC.CN)
APPS.TO vs GBLC.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GBLC.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while GBLC.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas GBLC.CN's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GBLC.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to GBLC.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check GBLC.CN's competition here
Arway Corporation (CNQ: ARWY.CN)
APPS.TO vs ARWY.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARWY.CN has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ARWY.CN trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ARWY.CN's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ARWY.CN's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ARWY.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ARWY.CN's competition here
Tevano Systems Holdings Inc. (CNQ: TEVO.CN)
APPS.TO vs TEVO.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TEVO.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TEVO.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TEVO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TEVO.CN's ROE of +3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to TEVO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TEVO.CN's competition here
Empatho Holdings Inc. (CNQ: EMPH.CN)
APPS.TO vs EMPH.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EMPH.CN has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while EMPH.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas EMPH.CN's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to EMPH.CN's ROE of +3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to EMPH.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check EMPH.CN's competition here
Prospect Park Capital Corp. (CNQ: PPK.CN)
APPS.TO vs PPK.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PPK.CN has a market cap of 828K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while PPK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas PPK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PPK.CN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to PPK.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check PPK.CN's competition here
Fandifi Technology Corp. (CNQ: FDM.CN)
APPS.TO vs FDM.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FDM.CN has a market cap of 821.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while FDM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas FDM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to FDM.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to FDM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check FDM.CN's competition here
Pushfor Tech Inc. (CNQ: PUSH.CN)
APPS.TO vs PUSH.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PUSH.CN has a market cap of 808.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while PUSH.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas PUSH.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PUSH.CN's ROE of -10.43%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is not fully comparable compared to PUSH.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check PUSH.CN's competition here
Credissential Inc. (CNQ: WHIP.CN)
APPS.TO vs WHIP.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WHIP.CN has a market cap of 798.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while WHIP.CN trades at CA$0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas WHIP.CN's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to WHIP.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to WHIP.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check WHIP.CN's competition here
TruTrace Technologies Inc. (CNQ: TTT.CN)
APPS.TO vs TTT.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TTT.CN has a market cap of 763.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TTT.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TTT.CN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TTT.CN's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to TTT.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TTT.CN's competition here
Solvbl Solutions Inc. (CNQ: SOLV.CN)
APPS.TO vs SOLV.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SOLV.CN has a market cap of 762.7K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SOLV.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SOLV.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SOLV.CN's ROE of -47.47%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to SOLV.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SOLV.CN's competition here
Infinity Stone Ventures Corp. (CNQ: GEMS.CN)
APPS.TO vs GEMS.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GEMS.CN has a market cap of 667.6K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while GEMS.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas GEMS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to GEMS.CN's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to GEMS.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check GEMS.CN's competition here
Xigem Technologies Corporation (CNQ: XIGM.CN)
APPS.TO vs XIGM.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XIGM.CN has a market cap of 650.8K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while XIGM.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas XIGM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XIGM.CN's ROE of -11.28%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to XIGM.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check XIGM.CN's competition here
Danavation Technologies Corp. (CNQ: DVN.CN)
APPS.TO vs DVN.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DVN.CN has a market cap of 604.1K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while DVN.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas DVN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to DVN.CN's ROE of +3.29%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to DVN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check DVN.CN's competition here
Plank Ventures Ltd. (CNQ: PLNK.CN)
APPS.TO vs PLNK.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PLNK.CN has a market cap of 443.5K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while PLNK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas PLNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PLNK.CN's ROE of +4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to PLNK.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check PLNK.CN's competition here
ZeU Technologies Inc. (CNQ: ZEU.CN)
APPS.TO vs ZEU.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZEU.CN has a market cap of 426.9K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while ZEU.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas ZEU.CN's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to ZEU.CN's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to ZEU.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check ZEU.CN's competition here
CoinAnalyst Corp. (CNQ: COYX.CN)
APPS.TO vs COYX.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COYX.CN has a market cap of 388.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while COYX.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas COYX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to COYX.CN's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to COYX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check COYX.CN's competition here
Radial Research Corp. (CNQ: RAD.CN)
APPS.TO vs RAD.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAD.CN has a market cap of 278.4K. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while RAD.CN trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas RAD.CN's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to RAD.CN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to RAD.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check RAD.CN's competition here
TraceSafe Inc. (CNQ: TSF.CN)
APPS.TO vs TSF.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TSF.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while TSF.CN trades at CA$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas TSF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to TSF.CN's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is not fully comparable compared to TSF.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check TSF.CN's competition here
LifeWorks Inc. (TSX: LWRK.TO)
APPS.TO vs LWRK.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LWRK.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LWRK.TO trades at CA$32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LWRK.TO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LWRK.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to LWRK.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LWRK.TO's competition here
GlobeX Data Ltd. (CNQ: SWIS.CN)
APPS.TO vs SWIS.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SWIS.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while SWIS.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas SWIS.CN's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to SWIS.CN's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is not fully comparable compared to SWIS.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check SWIS.CN's competition here
Voyager Digital Ltd. (TSX: VOYG.TO)
APPS.TO vs VOYG.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VOYG.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while VOYG.TO trades at CA$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas VOYG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to VOYG.TO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to VOYG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check VOYG.TO's competition here
NexJ Systems Inc. (TSX: NXJ.TO)
APPS.TO vs NXJ.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXJ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while NXJ.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas NXJ.TO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to NXJ.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to NXJ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check NXJ.TO's competition here
Patriot One Technologies Inc. (TSX: PAT.TO)
APPS.TO vs PAT.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PAT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while PAT.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas PAT.TO's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to PAT.TO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is less volatile compared to PAT.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check PAT.TO's competition here
Green Block Mining Corp. (CNQ: LNK.CN)
APPS.TO vs LNK.CN Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNK.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while LNK.CN trades at CA$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas LNK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to LNK.CN's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is not fully comparable compared to LNK.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check LNK.CN's competition here
exactEarth Ltd. (TSX: XCT.TO)
APPS.TO vs XCT.TO Comparison September 2026
AppLovin Corporation (TSX: APPS.TO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, APPS.TO stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XCT.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, APPS.TO is priced at CA$9.67 on the TSX, while XCT.TO trades at CA$3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
APPS.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.52, whereas XCT.TO's P/E ratio is -55.36. In terms of profitability, APPS.TO's ROE is N/A, compared to XCT.TO's ROE of +20.20%. Regarding short-term risk, APPS.TO is more volatile compared to XCT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for APPS.TO.Check XCT.TO's competition here