Bragg Gaming Group Inc. (BRAG.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, VST.CN has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while VST.CN trades at CA$0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas VST.CN's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VST.CN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is less volatile compared to VST.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check VST.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, GMNG.CN has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while GMNG.CN trades at CA$0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas GMNG.CN's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GMNG.CN's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is less volatile compared to GMNG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check GMNG.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, VRTS.TO has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while VRTS.TO trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas VRTS.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VRTS.TO's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is less volatile compared to VRTS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check VRTS.TO's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, EAGR.TO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while EAGR.TO trades at CA$0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas EAGR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EAGR.TO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is less volatile compared to EAGR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check EAGR.TO's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, BETS.CN has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while BETS.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas BETS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BETS.CN's ROE of -79.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to BETS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check BETS.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, PLAY.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while PLAY.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas PLAY.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to PLAY.CN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to PLAY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check PLAY.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, SWRM.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while SWRM.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas SWRM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SWRM.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is less volatile compared to SWRM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check SWRM.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, GET.CN has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while GET.CN trades at CA$0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas GET.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GET.CN's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to GET.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check GET.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, EPY.CN has a market cap of 989.7K. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while EPY.CN trades at CA$0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas EPY.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EPY.CN's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to EPY.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check EPY.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, TIDL.CN has a market cap of 152.2K. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while TIDL.CN trades at CA$0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas TIDL.CN's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TIDL.CN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to TIDL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check TIDL.CN's competition here

BRAG.TO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BRAG.TO stands at 60.4M. In comparison, ALPA.CN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BRAG.TO is priced at CA$2.37, while ALPA.CN trades at CA$0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BRAG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -5.62, whereas ALPA.CN's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, BRAG.TO's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALPA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BRAG.TO is more volatile compared to ALPA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BRAG.TO.Check ALPA.CN's competition here