KPI Green Energy Limited
KPI Green Energy Limited (KPIGLOBAL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KPIGLOBAL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPIGLOBAL.NS | ₹541.00 | -0.67% | 0 | 16.78 | ₹32.24 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹981.35 | -0.00% | 1.6T | 112.93 | ₹8.54 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹981.35 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 112.90 | ₹8.54 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹2,907.05 | +0.01% | 1.1T | 90.21 | ₹33.23 | +0.13% |
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹89.87 | -0.03% | 760.2B | 130.75 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| NHPC.NS | ₹75.77 | +0.00% | 760.1B | 48.51 | ₹1.56 | +2.52% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹75.77 | +0.00% | 760B | 48.50 | ₹1.56 | +2.52% |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹44.14 | +0.00% | 592.5B | 18.31 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹44.13 | +0.00% | 592.2B | 18.30 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SJVN.BO | ₹74.20 | +0.00% | 295.4B | 45.84 | ₹1.64 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹981.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 112.93. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹981.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 112.90. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs ENRIN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹2,907.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 90.21. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs NTPCGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, NTPCGREEN.NS has a market cap of 760.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while NTPCGREEN.NS trades at ₹89.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NTPCGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 130.75. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to NTPCGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check NTPCGREEN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs NHPC.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 760.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹75.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.51. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs NHPC.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 760B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹75.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 592.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹44.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 592.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹44.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 18.30. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs SJVN.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 295.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs SJVN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 295.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹74.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 164.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 34.73. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 164.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹95.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹231.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 29.20. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs ACMESOLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.BO has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while ACMESOLAR.BO trades at ₹231.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas ACMESOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs IWEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs IWEL.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹865.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹385.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹385.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹175.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 104.67. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹175.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 103.98. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹499.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹497.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 104.44. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 104.22. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 519.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 93.50. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 507.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹43.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 91.35. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
KPIGLOBAL.NS vs SMEL.BO Comparison February 2026
KPIGLOBAL.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPIGLOBAL.NS stands at 0. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KPIGLOBAL.NS is priced at ₹541.00, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPIGLOBAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 16.78, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE is +0.53%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KPIGLOBAL.NS is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPIGLOBAL.NS.Check SMEL.BO's competition here