NTPC Green Energy Ltd.
NTPC Green Energy Ltd. (NTPCGREEN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NTPCGREEN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹109.22 | -0.57% | 937.8B | 161.29 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹1,330.75 | +8.55% | 2.1T | 133.38 | ₹9.68 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹1,331.40 | +8.50% | 2.1T | 133.20 | ₹9.69 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹3,297.40 | +0.57% | 1.2T | 100.26 | ₹33.12 | +0.12% |
| NHPC.NS | ₹83.17 | -0.04% | 836.6B | 53.38 | ₹1.56 | +2.29% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹83.19 | +0.01% | 836.6B | 53.38 | ₹1.56 | +2.29% |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹54.90 | -1.35% | 754.1B | 23.30 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹54.85 | -1.31% | 753.8B | 23.29 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SJVN.BO | ₹79.40 | +0.44% | 314B | 48.71 | ₹1.64 | +1.83% |
| SJVN.NS | ₹79.36 | +0.48% | 313.8B | 48.99 | ₹1.63 | +1.83% |
Stock Comparison
NTPCGREEN.NS vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹1,330.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 133.38. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹1,331.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 133.20. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs ENRIN.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹3,297.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 100.26. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs NHPC.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 836.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹83.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs NHPC.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 836.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹83.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 53.38. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 754.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹54.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 753.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs SJVN.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 314B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹79.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs SJVN.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 313.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 48.99. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹295.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 37.20. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs ACMESOLAR.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.BO has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while ACMESOLAR.BO trades at ₹295.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas ACMESOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.18. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check ACMESOLAR.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹104.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs IWEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs IWEL.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 106.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹1,016.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹455.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹455.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 75.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹190.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 113.84. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹190.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 113.80. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹588.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹586.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.32. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 121.33. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 121.00. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 600.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.46. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 584.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs SMEL.BO Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check SMEL.BO's competition here
NTPCGREEN.NS vs KPIGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
NTPCGREEN.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NTPCGREEN.NS stands at 937.8B. In comparison, KPIGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTPCGREEN.NS is priced at ₹109.22, while KPIGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NTPCGREEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 161.29, whereas KPIGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NTPCGREEN.NS is less volatile compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTPCGREEN.NS.Check KPIGLOBAL.NS's competition here