Kelso Technologies Inc.
Kelso Technologies Inc. (KIQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Railroads Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQ | $0.14 | +3.85% | 10.9M | -7.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| UNP | $262.97 | +0.00% | 157.9B | 22.19 | $11.99 | +2.05% |
| CSX | $41.68 | +0.00% | 78.7B | 27.47 | $1.54 | +1.23% |
| CP | $84.70 | +0.00% | 76.7B | 25.63 | $3.32 | +0.74% |
| NSC | $314.05 | +0.00% | 71B | 24.82 | $12.74 | +1.71% |
| CNI | $109.43 | +0.00% | 67.6B | 19.87 | $5.56 | +2.30% |
| WAB | $261.88 | -0.00% | 45.3B | 38.77 | $6.83 | +0.40% |
| TRN | $34.15 | +0.00% | 2.8B | 11.14 | $3.14 | +3.47% |
| GBX | $57.97 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 10.20 | $5.77 | +2.18% |
| FSTR | $31.13 | +0.02% | 325.2M | 69.53 | $0.45 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KIQ vs UNP Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, UNP has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while UNP trades at $262.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas UNP's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UNP's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to UNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check UNP's competition here
KIQ vs CSX Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, CSX has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while CSX trades at $41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CSX's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CSX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to CSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check CSX's competition here
KIQ vs CP Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, CP has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while CP trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CP's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to CP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check CP's competition here
KIQ vs NSC Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, NSC has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while NSC trades at $314.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas NSC's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NSC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to NSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check NSC's competition here
KIQ vs CNI Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, CNI has a market cap of 67.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while CNI trades at $109.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas CNI's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CNI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to CNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check CNI's competition here
KIQ vs WAB Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, WAB has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while WAB trades at $261.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas WAB's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to WAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check WAB's competition here
KIQ vs TRN Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, TRN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while TRN trades at $34.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas TRN's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to TRN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to TRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check TRN's competition here
KIQ vs GBX Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, GBX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while GBX trades at $57.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas GBX's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to GBX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to GBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check GBX's competition here
KIQ vs FSTR Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, FSTR has a market cap of 325.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while FSTR trades at $31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas FSTR's P/E ratio is 69.53. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FSTR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to FSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check FSTR's competition here
KIQ vs RAIL Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, RAIL has a market cap of 265.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while RAIL trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RAIL's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RAIL's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to RAIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check RAIL's competition here
KIQ vs RVSN Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, RVSN has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while RVSN trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RVSN's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RVSN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is less volatile compared to RVSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check RVSN's competition here
KIQ vs RVSNW Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, RVSNW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while RVSNW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas RVSNW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to RVSNW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is less volatile compared to RVSNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check RVSNW's competition here
KIQ vs KSU Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, KSU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while KSU trades at $293.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas KSU's P/E ratio is 277.50. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KSU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to KSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check KSU's competition here
KIQ vs KSU-P Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, KSU-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while KSU-P trades at $37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas KSU-P's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to KSU-P's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to KSU-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check KSU-P's competition here
KIQ vs PRL Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, PRL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while PRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas PRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to PRL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to PRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check PRL's competition here
KIQ vs BNI Comparison February 2026
KIQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIQ stands at 10.9M. In comparison, BNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIQ is priced at $0.14, while BNI trades at $100.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIQ currently has a P/E ratio of -7.00, whereas BNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIQ's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BNI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIQ is more volatile compared to BNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIQ.Check BNI's competition here