KEI Industries Limited
KEI Industries Limited (KEI.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KEI.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEI.BO | ₹4,003.30 | -4.96% | 400.4B | 46.42 | ₹90.23 | +0.11% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹6,798.00 | -5.32% | 1.1T | 41.20 | ₹174.04 | +0.49% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹6,820.00 | -4.87% | 1.1T | 41.21 | ₹174.02 | +0.49% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹663.15 | -3.43% | 1.1T | 95.46 | ₹7.14 | +0.19% |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹665.15 | -3.27% | 1.1T | 94.49 | ₹7.21 | +0.19% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,233.25 | -4.81% | 803.8B | 54.16 | ₹23.66 | +0.78% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,233.10 | -4.73% | 803.6B | 54.08 | ₹23.69 | +0.78% |
| KEI.NS | ₹3,984.50 | -5.42% | 400.4B | 46.31 | ₹90.43 | +0.11% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹9,779.00 | +1.89% | 388.5B | 39.95 | ₹242.15 | +0.53% |
| APARINDS.BO | ₹9,676.50 | +0.86% | 388.4B | 40.01 | ₹241.70 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
KEI.BO vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹6,798.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹6,820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 41.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹663.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 95.46. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹665.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 94.49. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 803.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,233.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 54.16. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 803.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,233.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 54.08. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs KEI.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 400.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while KEI.NS trades at ₹3,984.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 46.31. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check KEI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs APARINDS.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 388.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹9,779.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.95. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs APARINDS.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 388.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹9,676.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HONAUT.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 250.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹27,376.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.54. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HONAUT.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 250.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹27,210.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 49.53. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹877.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 87.09. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 182.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹628.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹625.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 157.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹1,313.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 157.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹1,326.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.68. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VGUARD.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹320.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 49.67. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VGUARD.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹319.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 49.64. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs ARE&M.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹737.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs ARE&M.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹724.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 134.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹815.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 134.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹808.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹561.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹565.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 49.32. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TRIL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TRIL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HEG.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 96.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HEG.BO trades at ₹480.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HEG.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HEG.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 96.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HEG.NS trades at ₹477.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HEG.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs STLTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, STLTECH.BO has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while STLTECH.BO trades at ₹177.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas STLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 2693.57. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to STLTECH.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to STLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check STLTECH.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹8,359.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 86.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹8,356.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs TARIL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 85.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹269.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹226.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹229.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs QPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹800.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 60.36. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs QPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹797.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 60.69. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹293.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 48.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹291.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹3,783.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹297.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹300.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs BBL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,186.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check BBL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs BBL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,201.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check BBL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIRECT.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIRECT.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,437.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 53.70. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹626.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹621.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MARSONS.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹127.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 70.18. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,419.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 57.28. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹282.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 54.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹286.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HPL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HPL.NS trades at ₹268.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HPL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HPL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HPL.BO trades at ₹269.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HPL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹64.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 54.97. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹1,248.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹1,240.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs DYCL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DYCL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹252.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs EXICOM.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.13. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs EXICOM.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹83.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODINSU.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹212.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹524.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹522.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹129.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SALZER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs MEIL.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹219.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs ELIN.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹109.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs ELIN.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹110.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹503.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs WSI.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while WSI.NS trades at ₹68.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is -147.36. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check WSI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs RMC.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while RMC.BO trades at ₹406.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check RMC.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs AEPL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹115.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 50.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs DENORA.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹681.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DENORA.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹679.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs HUIL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹468.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹377.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹180.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 71.80. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs SHERA.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹102.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs DEL.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, DEL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while DEL.BO trades at ₹181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas DEL.BO's P/E ratio is 64.93. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DEL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to DEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check DEL.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -40.59. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹277.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -40.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs PANCARBON.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, PANCARBON.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while PANCARBON.BO trades at ₹431.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas PANCARBON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PANCARBON.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to PANCARBON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PANCARBON.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs PANAENERG.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, PANAENERG.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while PANAENERG.BO trades at ₹268.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas PANAENERG.BO's P/E ratio is 70.69. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PANAENERG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to PANAENERG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check PANAENERG.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹140.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹139.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs LAKSELEC.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, LAKSELEC.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while LAKSELEC.BO trades at ₹750.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas LAKSELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 68.14. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LAKSELEC.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to LAKSELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check LAKSELEC.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VETO.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VETO.BO trades at ₹91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VETO.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs VETO.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while VETO.NS trades at ₹90.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check VETO.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs APLAB.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹66.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check APLAB.BO's competition here
KEI.BO vs GOLDSTAR.NS Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, GOLDSTAR.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while GOLDSTAR.NS trades at ₹6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas GOLDSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 78.33. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GOLDSTAR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is more volatile compared to GOLDSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check GOLDSTAR.NS's competition here
KEI.BO vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KEI.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.BO stands at 400.4B. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.BO is priced at ₹4,003.30, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹890.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 46.42, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, KEI.BO's ROE is +0.16%, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.BO is less volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.BO.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here