Kinross Gold Corporation
Kinross Gold Corporation K.TO Peers
See (K.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K.TO | CA$20.68 | -2.18% | 25.4B | 15.43 | CA$1.34 | +0.81% |
| AEM.TO | CA$161.58 | -3.14% | 81.7B | 25.09 | CA$6.44 | +1.01% |
| NGT.TO | CA$71.78 | -3.66% | 79.9B | 11.92 | CA$6.02 | +1.93% |
| WPM.TO | CA$121.52 | -2.95% | 55.2B | 64.98 | CA$1.87 | +0.75% |
| ABX.TO | CA$27.15 | -0.73% | 46.7B | 15.00 | CA$1.81 | +2.04% |
| FNV.TO | CA$228.98 | -2.87% | 44.1B | 51.92 | CA$4.41 | +0.89% |
| NCM.TO | CA$20.65 | +2.03% | 18.5B | 17.21 | CA$1.20 | N/A |
| LUG.TO | CA$71.87 | +1.11% | 17.3B | 23.64 | CA$3.04 | +1.70% |
| AGI.TO | CA$36.51 | -1.03% | 15.4B | 42.95 | CA$0.85 | +0.28% |
| EDV.TO | CA$42.34 | -3.71% | 10.2B | -73.00 | -CA$0.58 | +2.37% |
Stock Comparison
K.TO vs AEM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AEM.TO has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AEM.TO trades at CA$161.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AEM.TO's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AEM.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to AEM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NGT.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NGT.TO has a market cap of 79.9B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NGT.TO trades at CA$71.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NGT.TO's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGT.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NGT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs WPM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, WPM.TO has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while WPM.TO trades at CA$121.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas WPM.TO's P/E ratio is 64.98. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WPM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to WPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ABX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ABX.TO has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ABX.TO trades at CA$27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ABX.TO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABX.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to ABX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs FNV.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, FNV.TO has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while FNV.TO trades at CA$228.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas FNV.TO's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FNV.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to FNV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NCM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NCM.TO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NCM.TO trades at CA$20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NCM.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NCM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to NCM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs LUG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, LUG.TO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while LUG.TO trades at CA$71.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas LUG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LUG.TO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to LUG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs AGI.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AGI.TO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AGI.TO trades at CA$36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AGI.TO's P/E ratio is 42.95. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AGI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to AGI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs EDV.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, EDV.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while EDV.TO trades at CA$42.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas EDV.TO's P/E ratio is -73.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EDV.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to EDV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs YRI.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, YRI.TO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while YRI.TO trades at CA$7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas YRI.TO's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YRI.TO's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to YRI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs OR.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, OR.TO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while OR.TO trades at CA$35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas OR.TO's P/E ratio is 154.43. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to OR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs BTO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, BTO.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while BTO.TO trades at CA$5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas BTO.TO's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to BTO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ELD.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ELD.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ELD.TO trades at CA$28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ELD.TO's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to ELD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs IMG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, IMG.TO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while IMG.TO trades at CA$10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas IMG.TO's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMG.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to IMG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NGD.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NGD.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NGD.TO trades at CA$6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NGD.TO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NGD.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs OLA.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, OLA.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while OLA.TO trades at CA$15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas OLA.TO's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OLA.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to OLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs PRU.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, PRU.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while PRU.TO trades at CA$3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas PRU.TO's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRU.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to PRU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs OGC.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, OGC.TO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while OGC.TO trades at CA$6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas OGC.TO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OGC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to OGC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs EQX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, EQX.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while EQX.TO trades at CA$9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas EQX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQX.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to EQX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs TXG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, TXG.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while TXG.TO trades at CA$46.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas TXG.TO's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXG.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to TXG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs KNT.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, KNT.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while KNT.TO trades at CA$15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas KNT.TO's P/E ratio is 15.32. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KNT.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to KNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SSL.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SSL.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SSL.TO trades at CA$12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SSL.TO's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSL.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to SSL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs DPM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, DPM.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while DPM.TO trades at CA$21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas DPM.TO's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DPM.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to DPM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SSRM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SSRM.TO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SSRM.TO trades at CA$17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SSRM.TO's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SSRM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to SSRM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CEE.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CEE.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CEE.TO trades at CA$2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CEE.TO's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CEE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to CEE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs WDO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, WDO.TO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while WDO.TO trades at CA$19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas WDO.TO's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDO.TO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to WDO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CXB.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CXB.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CXB.TO trades at CA$3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CXB.TO's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CXB.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to CXB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs WGX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, WGX.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while WGX.TO trades at CA$2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas WGX.TO's P/E ratio is 38.71. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WGX.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to WGX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ORA.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ORA.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ORA.TO trades at CA$33.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ORA.TO's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORA.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ORA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs AAUC.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AAUC.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AAUC.TO trades at CA$20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AAUC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AAUC.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to AAUC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NG.TO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NG.TO trades at CA$5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NG.TO's P/E ratio is -30.26. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NG.TO's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CG.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CG.TO trades at CA$9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CG.TO's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CG.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to CG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SEA.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SEA.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SEA.TO trades at CA$19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SEA.TO's P/E ratio is -132.67. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SEA.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to SEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs OSK.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, OSK.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while OSK.TO trades at CA$4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas OSK.TO's P/E ratio is -489.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OSK.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to OSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs RUP.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, RUP.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while RUP.TO trades at CA$5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas RUP.TO's P/E ratio is -186.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RUP.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to RUP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CNL.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CNL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CNL.TO trades at CA$15.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CNL.TO's P/E ratio is -22.98. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNL.TO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to CNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SBB.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SBB.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SBB.TO trades at CA$2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SBB.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBB.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to SBB.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs KRR.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, KRR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while KRR.TO trades at CA$6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas KRR.TO's P/E ratio is 83.75. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRR.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to KRR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GTWO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GTWO.TO has a market cap of 757.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GTWO.TO trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GTWO.TO's P/E ratio is -78.75. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTWO.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to GTWO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs MSA.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, MSA.TO has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while MSA.TO trades at CA$2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas MSA.TO's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MSA.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to MSA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ORE.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ORE.TO has a market cap of 727.1M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ORE.TO trades at CA$1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ORE.TO's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ORE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ORE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ASE.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ASE.CN has a market cap of 691.6M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ASE.CN trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ASE.CN's P/E ratio is -6.27. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ASE.CN's ROE of -30.89%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to ASE.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs AR.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AR.TO has a market cap of 659.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AR.TO trades at CA$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AR.TO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to AR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs IAU.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, IAU.TO has a market cap of 654.1M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while IAU.TO trades at CA$0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas IAU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IAU.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to IAU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs PRB.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, PRB.TO has a market cap of 516M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while PRB.TO trades at CA$2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas PRB.TO's P/E ratio is -15.81. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRB.TO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to PRB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GAU.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GAU.TO has a market cap of 509.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GAU.TO trades at CA$1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GAU.TO's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GAU.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to GAU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs MND.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, MND.TO has a market cap of 481.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while MND.TO trades at CA$5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas MND.TO's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MND.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to MND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs FDR.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, FDR.V has a market cap of 417.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while FDR.V trades at CA$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas FDR.V's P/E ratio is -32.38. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FDR.V's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to FDR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SGD.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SGD.CN has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SGD.CN trades at CA$3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SGD.CN's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGD.CN's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to SGD.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs MOZ.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, MOZ.TO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while MOZ.TO trades at CA$0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas MOZ.TO's P/E ratio is -16.20. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MOZ.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to MOZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs STGO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, STGO.TO has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while STGO.TO trades at CA$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas STGO.TO's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STGO.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to STGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs JAG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, JAG.TO has a market cap of 317.3M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while JAG.TO trades at CA$4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas JAG.TO's P/E ratio is -36.36. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to JAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SBI.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SBI.TO has a market cap of 287.6M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SBI.TO trades at CA$3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SBI.TO's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBI.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to SBI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ITH.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ITH.TO has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ITH.TO trades at CA$1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ITH.TO's P/E ratio is -43.83. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ITH.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ITH.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GOLD.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GOLD.TO has a market cap of 209.7M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GOLD.TO trades at CA$1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GOLD.TO's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GOLD.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to GOLD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs FF.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, FF.TO has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while FF.TO trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas FF.TO's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FF.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to FF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs DNG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, DNG.TO has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while DNG.TO trades at CA$4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas DNG.TO's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DNG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to DNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs VGZ.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, VGZ.TO has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while VGZ.TO trades at CA$1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas VGZ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGZ.TO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to VGZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs LGD.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, LGD.TO has a market cap of 143.1M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while LGD.TO trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas LGD.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGD.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to LGD.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SANU.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SANU.CN has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SANU.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SANU.CN's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SANU.CN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to SANU.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs TNX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, TNX.TO has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while TNX.TO trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas TNX.TO's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to TNX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs COG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, COG.TO has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while COG.TO trades at CA$0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas COG.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COG.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to COG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CBR.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CBR.V has a market cap of 114.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CBR.V trades at CA$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CBR.V's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBR.V's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to CBR.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ELO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ELO.TO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ELO.TO trades at CA$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ELO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELO.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ELO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NEXG.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NEXG.V has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NEXG.V trades at CA$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NEXG.V's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEXG.V's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NEXG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs STLR.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, STLR.TO has a market cap of 107.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while STLR.TO trades at CA$0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas STLR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STLR.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to STLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GHRT.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GHRT.V has a market cap of 104.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GHRT.V trades at CA$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GHRT.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GHRT.V's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to GHRT.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs MAW.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, MAW.TO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while MAW.TO trades at CA$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas MAW.TO's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MAW.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to MAW.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs LN.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, LN.TO has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while LN.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas LN.TO's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LN.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to LN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs XTG.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, XTG.TO has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while XTG.TO trades at CA$2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas XTG.TO's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to XTG.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to XTG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs BSX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, BSX.TO has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while BSX.TO trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas BSX.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSX.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to BSX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs G.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, G.TO has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while G.TO trades at CA$0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas G.TO's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to G.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to G.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SIG.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SIG.CN has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SIG.CN trades at CA$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SIG.CN's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIG.CN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to SIG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CCM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CCM.TO has a market cap of 71.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CCM.TO trades at CA$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CCM.TO's P/E ratio is -39.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CCM.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to CCM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs BLLG.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, BLLG.CN has a market cap of 66.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while BLLG.CN trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas BLLG.CN's P/E ratio is -18.33. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLLG.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to BLLG.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs TML.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, TML.TO has a market cap of 64.7M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while TML.TO trades at CA$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas TML.TO's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TML.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to TML.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs HMR.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, HMR.V has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while HMR.V trades at CA$0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas HMR.V's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HMR.V's ROE of -5.38%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to HMR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs CGC.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, CGC.V has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while CGC.V trades at CA$0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas CGC.V's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CGC.V's ROE of +13.62%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to CGC.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs VEIN.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, VEIN.V has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while VEIN.V trades at CA$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas VEIN.V's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VEIN.V's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to VEIN.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ESM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ESM.TO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ESM.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ESM.TO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESM.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ESM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs ME.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, ME.TO has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while ME.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas ME.TO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ME.TO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to ME.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs USGD.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, USGD.CN has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while USGD.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas USGD.CN's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to USGD.CN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to USGD.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NHK.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NHK.TO has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NHK.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NHK.TO's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NHK.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NHK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs BNN.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, BNN.CN has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while BNN.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas BNN.CN's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BNN.CN's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to BNN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NVO.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NVO.TO has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NVO.TO trades at CA$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NVO.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NVO.TO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NVO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs VLC.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, VLC.V has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while VLC.V trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas VLC.V's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VLC.V's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to VLC.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs VGCX.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, VGCX.TO has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while VGCX.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas VGCX.TO's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VGCX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to VGCX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs SGNL.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, SGNL.TO has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while SGNL.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas SGNL.TO's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGNL.TO's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to SGNL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GTCH.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GTCH.CN has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GTCH.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GTCH.CN's P/E ratio is -11.75. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTCH.CN's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to GTCH.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs AMM.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AMM.TO has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AMM.TO trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AMM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMM.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to AMM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs WG.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, WG.CN has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while WG.CN trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas WG.CN's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WG.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to WG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs VAU.V Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, VAU.V has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while VAU.V trades at CA$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas VAU.V's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VAU.V's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to VAU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs GRC.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, GRC.TO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while GRC.TO trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas GRC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRC.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to GRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs HWG.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, HWG.CN has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while HWG.CN trades at CA$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas HWG.CN's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWG.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to HWG.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs AUOZ.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, AUOZ.CN has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while AUOZ.CN trades at CA$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas AUOZ.CN's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AUOZ.CN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to AUOZ.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs QIM.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, QIM.CN has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while QIM.CN trades at CA$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas QIM.CN's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QIM.CN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to QIM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs PME.TO Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, PME.TO has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while PME.TO trades at CA$2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas PME.TO's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PME.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is more volatile compared to PME.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs RISE.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, RISE.CN has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while RISE.CN trades at CA$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas RISE.CN's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RISE.CN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to RISE.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.
K.TO vs NOM.CN Comparison
K.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, K.TO stands at 25.4B. In comparison, NOM.CN has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, K.TO is priced at CA$20.68, while NOM.CN trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
K.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 15.43, whereas NOM.CN's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, K.TO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOM.CN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, K.TO is less volatile compared to NOM.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for K.TO.