IVP Limited (IVP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IVP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVP.NS | ₹158.95 | -0.24% | 1.6B | 8.71 | ₹18.09 | +0.64% |
| ASIANPAINT.BO | ₹2,662.90 | -2.59% | 2.6T | 66.50 | ₹40.22 | +0.94% |
| ASIANPAINT.NS | ₹2,662.00 | -2.59% | 2.6T | 59.30 | ₹45.09 | +0.94% |
| SOLARINDS.NS | ₹18,167.00 | +0.64% | 1.7T | 99.18 | ₹185.94 | +0.05% |
| SOLARINDS.BO | ₹18,127.50 | +0.44% | 1.7T | 99.14 | ₹185.90 | +0.05% |
| PIDILITIND.BO | ₹1,565.00 | -0.92% | 1.6T | 69.94 | ₹22.48 | +0.95% |
| PIDILITIND.NS | ₹1,573.90 | -0.38% | 1.6T | 65.48 | ₹24.01 | +0.95% |
| SRF.NS | ₹2,738.00 | +1.04% | 806.5B | 44.04 | ₹61.78 | +0.33% |
| SRF.BO | ₹2,738.10 | +1.06% | 806.5B | 43.84 | ₹62.04 | +0.33% |
| BERGEPAINT.BO | ₹544.70 | -1.25% | 645.5B | 59.24 | ₹9.27 | +0.69% |
Stock Comparison
IVP.NS vs ASIANPAINT.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,662.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ASIANPAINT.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,662.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 59.30. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs SOLARINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹18,167.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 99.18. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs SOLARINDS.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.7T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹18,127.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 99.14. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PIDILITIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 69.94. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PIDILITIND.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,573.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 65.48. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs SRF.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 806.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,738.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SRF.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs SRF.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 806.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,738.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 43.84. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SRF.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs BERGEPAINT.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 645.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹544.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 59.24. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs BERGEPAINT.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 641.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹543.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 57.06. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs LINDEINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 632.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹7,225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 115.28. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs LINDEINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 632.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹7,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 115.16. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.NS has a market cap of 423.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while FLUOROCHEM.NS trades at ₹3,895.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas FLUOROCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 73.75. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 421.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,887.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 73.55. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs HSCL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 331.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹640.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.60. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check HSCL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs HSCL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 330.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹634.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.58. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check HSCL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ACUTAAS.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 266B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹3,288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 92.69. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ACUTAAS.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 266B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹3,277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 92.73. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ATUL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 192.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,516.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.43. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ATUL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ATUL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 192.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ATUL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AARTIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹473.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AARTIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹473.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.70. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs KANSAINER.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 29.77. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs KANSAINER.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 174.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AETHER.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹1,248.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 74.35. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AETHER.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AETHER.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹1,246.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 74.44. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AETHER.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,029.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 162.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,035.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs GRWRHITECH.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹6,760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs GRWRHITECH.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹6,773.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs FINEORG.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹5,070.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs FINEORG.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹5,092.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs BASF.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,751.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BASF.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs BASF.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 37.08. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BASF.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ANURAS.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,272.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ANURAS.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,274.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.53. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PRIVISCL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 143.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹3,585.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PRIVISCL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 142.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹3,581.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.60. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs VINATIORGA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 139.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs VINATIORGA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,362.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs AKZOINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,986.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AKZOINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,985.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PCBL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹308.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PCBL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs PCBL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 122.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PCBL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs JUBLINGREA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.NS has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JUBLINGREA.NS trades at ₹631.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JUBLINGREA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUBLINGREA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs JUBLINGREA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹630.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.89. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs AMIORG.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs AMIORG.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,802.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 93.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs CLEAN.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs CLEAN.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹801.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹885.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 320.35. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 71.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹886.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 134.18. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs GALAXYSURF.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 70.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,920.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs GALAXYSURF.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,922.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs KINGFA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹5,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs BALAMINES.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹2,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 41.23. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs BALAMINES.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹2,064.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs KINGFA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹5,161.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs RESPONIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹201.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.10. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs RESPONIND.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹200.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs GULFOILLUB.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹1,041.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs GULFOILLUB.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹1,039.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs NEOGEN.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,926.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 176.98. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs NEOGEN.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,924.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 176.95. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹1,010.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹1,008.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs TANFACIND.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹2,345.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 66.08. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs LXCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹160.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 56.96. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs LXCHEM.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹160.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 57.01. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs VISHNU.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹614.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs VISHNU.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹622.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ADVENZYMES.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹374.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.89. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ADVENZYMES.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹375.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs POCL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,362.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check POCL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs POCL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,352.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.08. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check POCL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs PREMEXPLN.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹752.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 88.95. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs PREMEXPLN.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.BO has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while PREMEXPLN.BO trades at ₹750.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas PREMEXPLN.BO's P/E ratio is 89.02. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PREMEXPLN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs SOTL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOTL.BO has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SOTL.BO trades at ₹571.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SOTL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.08. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to SOTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SOTL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs SOTL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SOTL.NS has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while SOTL.NS trades at ₹570.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas SOTL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOTL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to SOTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check SOTL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs GRAUWEIL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹73.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs GRAUWEIL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹73.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs YASHO.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YASHO.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while YASHO.NS trades at ₹2,909.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas YASHO.NS's P/E ratio is 136.36. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YASHO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to YASHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check YASHO.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs YASHO.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, YASHO.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while YASHO.BO trades at ₹2,879.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas YASHO.BO's P/E ratio is 135.74. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YASHO.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to YASHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check YASHO.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs NOCIL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOCIL.BO has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while NOCIL.BO trades at ₹188.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NOCIL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOCIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check NOCIL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs NOCIL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NOCIL.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while NOCIL.NS trades at ₹189.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas NOCIL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NOCIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to NOCIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check NOCIL.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs XPROINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while XPROINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,336.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas XPROINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 159.66. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPROINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to XPROINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check XPROINDIA.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs XPROINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XPROINDIA.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while XPROINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,332.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas XPROINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 159.46. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XPROINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is more volatile compared to XPROINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check XPROINDIA.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs ROSSARI.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹534.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs ROSSARI.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹532.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs POLYPLEX.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹966.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 66.36. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs POLYPLEX.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹963.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 66.32. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs JINDALPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JINDALPOLY.NS trades at ₹637.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JINDALPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -13.81. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JINDALPOLY.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs JINDALPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JINDALPOLY.BO has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JINDALPOLY.BO trades at ₹636.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JINDALPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -22.59. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JINDALPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JINDALPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JINDALPOLY.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹278.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹277.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here
IVP.NS vs JUBLCPL.BO Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹2,031.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here
IVP.NS vs JUBLCPL.NS Comparison June 2026
IVP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IVP.NS stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IVP.NS is priced at ₹158.95, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,980.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IVP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 8.71, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, IVP.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IVP.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IVP.NS.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here