Independence Realty Trust, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IRT
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IRT
Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRT | $15.15 | +0.53% | 3.6B | 63.21 | $0.24 | +4.49% |
| AVB | $167.73 | +0.76% | 23.7B | 22.67 | $7.40 | +4.21% |
| EQR | $60.21 | +0.25% | 22.7B | 20.48 | $2.94 | +4.62% |
| MAA-PI | $54.84 | +0.16% | 16.2B | 10.65 | $5.15 | +4.89% |
| ESS | $248.30 | +0.24% | 16B | 23.90 | $10.39 | +4.15% |
| SUI | $126.94 | -0.70% | 15.6B | -208.10 | -$0.61 | +6.48% |
| INVH | $25.62 | +0.59% | 15.6B | 26.69 | $0.96 | +4.60% |
| MAA | $124.30 | -0.42% | 14.5B | 32.88 | $3.78 | +4.89% |
| AMH-PH | $23.67 | -1.09% | 12.9B | 49.48 | $0.48 | +4.20% |
| AMH-PG | $22.43 | -1.21% | 12.6B | 46.54 | $0.48 | +4.20% |
Stock Comparison
IRT vs AVB Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AVB trades at $167.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AVB's competition here
IRT vs EQR Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while EQR trades at $60.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check EQR's competition here
IRT vs MAA-PI Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while MAA-PI trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA-PI's competition here
IRT vs ESS Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while ESS trades at $248.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ESS's competition here
IRT vs SUI Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while SUI trades at $126.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -208.10. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUI's competition here
IRT vs INVH Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while INVH trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check INVH's competition here
IRT vs MAA Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while MAA trades at $124.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PH Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AMH-PH trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PH's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PG Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AMH-PG trades at $22.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 46.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PG's competition here
IRT vs ELS Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while ELS trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ELS's competition here
IRT vs UDR Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while UDR trades at $34.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UDR's competition here
IRT vs AMH Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AMH trades at $29.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH's competition here
IRT vs CPT Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while CPT trades at $100.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CPT's competition here
IRT vs AIRC Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIRC's competition here
IRT vs MRP Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while MRP trades at $27.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MRP's competition here
IRT vs VRE Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while VRE trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check VRE's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PD Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while UMH-PD trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 107.95. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PD's competition here
IRT vs UMH Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while UMH trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 212.43. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH's competition here
IRT vs CSR Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while CSR trades at $60.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is 58.86. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR's competition here
IRT vs CSR-PC Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR-PC's competition here
IRT vs NXRT Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 623.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while NXRT trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -19.48. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check NXRT's competition here
IRT vs AIV Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 582.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AIV trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIV's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIV's competition here
IRT vs BRT Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 263.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while BRT trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRT's competition here
IRT vs SUNS Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 103.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while SUNS trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 8.23. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUNS's competition here
IRT vs CLPR Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while CLPR trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CLPR's competition here
IRT vs BHM Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while BHM trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BHM's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PD Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PD's competition here
IRT vs ACC Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ACC's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PC Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PC's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PE Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PE's competition here
IRT vs PPS Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PPS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while PPS trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas PPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to PPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check PPS's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PC Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PC's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PF Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PF's competition here
IRT vs BRG Comparison April 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $15.15, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 63.21, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG's competition here