Industrias Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V.
Industrias Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V. IPOAF Peers
See (IPOAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPOAF | $20.05 | -2.15% | 7.97B | 111.39 | $0.18 | N/A |
| BHPLF | $24.31 | +3.65% | 123.35B | 10.85 | $2.24 | +5.10% |
| RTNTF | $78.61 | -0.47% | 108.08B | 11.10 | $7.08 | +2.99% |
| RTPPF | $61.77 | +0.94% | 106.01B | 8.74 | $7.07 | +6.51% |
| GLNCY | $7.01 | -0.57% | 42.73B | -26.96 | -$0.26 | +3.07% |
| GLCNF | $3.52 | -0.28% | 42.30B | -27.08 | -$0.13 | +3.27% |
| GMBXF | $5.35 | +1.04% | 41.65B | 11.63 | $0.46 | +2.48% |
| FSUMF | $10.97 | +1.29% | 33.73B | 8.71 | $1.26 | +8.07% |
| AAUKF | $27.71 | N/A | 33.62B | -10.95 | -$2.53 | +2.29% |
| NGLOY | $13.83 | +0.22% | 33.56B | -10.89 | -$1.27 | +2.32% |
Stock Comparison
IPOAF vs BHPLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BHPLF has a market cap of 123.35B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BHPLF trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BHPLF's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHPLF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BHPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs RTNTF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, RTNTF has a market cap of 108.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while RTNTF trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas RTNTF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTNTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and RTNTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs RTPPF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, RTPPF has a market cap of 106.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while RTPPF trades at $61.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas RTPPF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RTPPF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and RTPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs GLNCY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, GLNCY has a market cap of 42.73B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while GLNCY trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas GLNCY's P/E ratio is -26.96. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLNCY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to GLNCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs GLCNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, GLCNF has a market cap of 42.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while GLCNF trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas GLCNF's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLCNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to GLCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs GMBXF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, GMBXF has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while GMBXF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas GMBXF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GMBXF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to GMBXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs FSUMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FSUMF has a market cap of 33.73B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FSUMF trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FSUMF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSUMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FSUMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AAUKF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AAUKF has a market cap of 33.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AAUKF trades at $27.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AAUKF's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AAUKF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to AAUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs NGLOY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NGLOY has a market cap of 33.56B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NGLOY trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NGLOY's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGLOY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to NGLOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs FSUGY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FSUGY has a market cap of 32.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FSUGY trades at $21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FSUGY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSUGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FSUGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CMCLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CMCLF has a market cap of 20.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CMCLF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CMCLF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CMCLF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to CMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs TCKRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, TCKRF has a market cap of 16.76B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while TCKRF trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas TCKRF's P/E ratio is 676.80. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCKRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to TCKRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs IVPAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, IVPAF has a market cap of 13.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while IVPAF trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas IVPAF's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IVPAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to IVPAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SHTLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SHTLF has a market cap of 9.54B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SHTLF trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SHTLF's P/E ratio is -42.40. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHTLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SHTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs BOLIF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BOLIF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BOLIF trades at $34.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BOLIF's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOLIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and BOLIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs BDNNY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BDNNY has a market cap of 9.16B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BDNNY trades at $64.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BDNNY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDNNY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BDNNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs JXMNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, JXMNF has a market cap of 8.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while JXMNF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas JXMNF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JXMNF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to JXMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ABML Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ABML has a market cap of 6.69B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ABML trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ABML's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABML's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ABML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SMMYY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SMMYY has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SMMYY trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SMMYY's P/E ratio is 55.10. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SMMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs STMNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, STMNF has a market cap of 5.23B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while STMNF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas STMNF's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STMNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and STMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs PUTKF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PUTKF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PUTKF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PUTKF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUTKF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and PUTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs PUTKY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PUTKY has a market cap of 4.96B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PUTKY trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PUTKY's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PUTKY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs NILSY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NILSY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NILSY trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NILSY's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NILSY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and NILSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs LYSCF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LYSCF has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LYSCF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LYSCF's P/E ratio is 163.83. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to LYSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs LYSDY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LYSDY has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LYSDY trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LYSDY's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LYSDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to LYSDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs PAEKY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PAEKY has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PAEKY trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PAEKY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAEKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PAEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MALRY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MALRY has a market cap of 3.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MALRY trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MALRY's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MALRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MALRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MALRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MALRF has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MALRF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MALRF's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MALRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and MALRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs FLMMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FLMMF has a market cap of 2.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FLMMF trades at $22.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FLMMF's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLMMF's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FLMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs PILBF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PILBF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PILBF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PILBF's P/E ratio is -92.52. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PILBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PILBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CHZQ Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CHZQ has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CHZQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CHZQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHZQ's ROE of +4.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and CHZQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs MIMTF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MIMTF has a market cap of 2.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MIMTF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MIMTF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MIMTF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MIMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs IPGDF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, IPGDF has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while IPGDF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas IPGDF's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPGDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and IPGDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs AZZVF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AZZVF has a market cap of 1.97B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AZZVF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AZZVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZZVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and AZZVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs DWMNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, DWMNF has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while DWMNF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas DWMNF's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DWMNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to DWMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs IIDDY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, IIDDY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while IIDDY trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas IIDDY's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IIDDY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to IIDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs NGXXF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NGXXF has a market cap of 1.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NGXXF trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NGXXF's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NGXXF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to NGXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SOUHY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SOUHY has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SOUHY trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SOUHY's P/E ratio is -36.65. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SOUHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SOUHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs NICMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NICMF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NICMF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NICMF's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NICMF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and NICMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ERMAY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ERMAY has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ERMAY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ERMAY's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERMAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and ERMAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ERMAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ERMAF has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ERMAF trades at $54.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ERMAF's P/E ratio is 99.56. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERMAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ERMAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs PTNDY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PTNDY has a market cap of 1.55B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PTNDY trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PTNDY's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTNDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PTNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AFBOF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AFBOF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AFBOF trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AFBOF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFBOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to AFBOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs PTNDF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PTNDF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PTNDF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PTNDF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTNDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PTNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs DETRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, DETRF has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while DETRF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas DETRF's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DETRF's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and DETRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ILKAY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ILKAY has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ILKAY trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ILKAY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ILKAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and ILKAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ILKAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ILKAF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ILKAF trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ILKAF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ILKAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ILKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AZRMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AZRMF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AZRMF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AZRMF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZRMF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and AZRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs LINRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LINRF has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LINRF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LINRF's P/E ratio is -44.07. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LINRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to LINRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs BQSSF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BQSSF has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BQSSF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BQSSF's P/E ratio is -60.75. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BQSSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BQSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs FMCXF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FMCXF has a market cap of 930.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FMCXF trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FMCXF's P/E ratio is -55.25. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMCXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FMCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs STTSY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, STTSY has a market cap of 918.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while STTSY trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas STTSY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STTSY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to STTSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ATUSF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ATUSF has a market cap of 898.92M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ATUSF trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ATUSF's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATUSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ATUSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AUSDF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AUSDF has a market cap of 876.26M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AUSDF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AUSDF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to AUSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs JMXXF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, JMXXF has a market cap of 862.86M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while JMXXF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas JMXXF's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JMXXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to JMXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ADTLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ADTLF has a market cap of 856.33M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ADTLF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ADTLF's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADTLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and ADTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ADMLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ADMLF has a market cap of 845.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ADMLF trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ADMLF's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADMLF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ADMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AFMJF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AFMJF has a market cap of 819.28M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AFMJF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AFMJF's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AFMJF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to AFMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AMVMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AMVMF has a market cap of 709.92M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AMVMF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AMVMF's P/E ratio is -57.89. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMVMF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and AMVMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs VULNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, VULNF has a market cap of 704.94M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while VULNF trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas VULNF's P/E ratio is -12.46. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VULNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to VULNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs NCKAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NCKAF has a market cap of 630.74M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NCKAF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NCKAF's P/E ratio is 1.29. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to NCKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MFRVF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MFRVF has a market cap of 604.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MFRVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MFRVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MFRVF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MFRVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CTJHF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CTJHF has a market cap of 596.40M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CTJHF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CTJHF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTJHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to CTJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs TAOFF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, TAOFF has a market cap of 539.38M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while TAOFF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas TAOFF's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TAOFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to TAOFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MJDLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MJDLF has a market cap of 536.90M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MJDLF trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MJDLF's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MJDLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and MJDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs ALMTF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ALMTF has a market cap of 493.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ALMTF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ALMTF's P/E ratio is -43.12. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALMTF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ALMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs TTNNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, TTNNF has a market cap of 492.10M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while TTNNF trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas TTNNF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTNNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to TTNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs OSTTF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, OSTTF has a market cap of 490.16M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while OSTTF trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas OSTTF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSTTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to OSTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MCRZF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MCRZF has a market cap of 466.46M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MCRZF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MCRZF's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCRZF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MCRZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs BIRNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BIRNF has a market cap of 433.13M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BIRNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BIRNF's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BIRNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BIRNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs LLLAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LLLAF has a market cap of 387.48M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LLLAF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LLLAF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LLLAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and LLLAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs NQMIY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, NQMIY has a market cap of 380.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while NQMIY trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas NQMIY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NQMIY's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and NQMIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs PXMFF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PXMFF has a market cap of 379.33M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PXMFF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PXMFF's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PXMFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PXMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs REEMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, REEMF has a market cap of 365.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while REEMF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas REEMF's P/E ratio is -23.60. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REEMF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to REEMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MCHHF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MCHHF has a market cap of 358.96M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MCHHF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MCHHF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCHHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MCHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CTJHY Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CTJHY has a market cap of 353.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CTJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CTJHY's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and CTJHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs FGOVF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FGOVF has a market cap of 351.41M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FGOVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FGOVF's P/E ratio is -66.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FGOVF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FGOVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MNXMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MNXMF has a market cap of 344.67M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MNXMF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MNXMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNXMF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MNXMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ERLFF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ERLFF has a market cap of 338.06M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ERLFF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ERLFF's P/E ratio is -32.60. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERLFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ERLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs KMRPF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, KMRPF has a market cap of 335.16M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while KMRPF trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas KMRPF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMRPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to KMRPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ARAFF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ARAFF has a market cap of 328.50M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ARAFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ARAFF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARAFF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and ARAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs MLYF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MLYF has a market cap of 326.72M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MLYF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MLYF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLYF's ROE of +5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to MLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs AUMTF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, AUMTF has a market cap of 313.13M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while AUMTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas AUMTF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUMTF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to AUMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SLGGF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SLGGF has a market cap of 300.11M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SLGGF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SLGGF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SLGGF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SLGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs MLXEF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, MLXEF has a market cap of 292.51M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while MLXEF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas MLXEF's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLXEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and MLXEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs LTSRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LTSRF has a market cap of 279.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LTSRF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LTSRF's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTSRF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to LTSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CGMLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CGMLF has a market cap of 272.32M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CGMLF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CGMLF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGMLF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to CGMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SVMLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SVMLF has a market cap of 268.48M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SVMLF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SVMLF's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVMLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SVMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs LRSRF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LRSRF has a market cap of 260.54M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LRSRF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LRSRF's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LRSRF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to LRSRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs FWEDF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, FWEDF has a market cap of 257.15M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while FWEDF trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas FWEDF's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FWEDF's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to FWEDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs SYAAF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, SYAAF has a market cap of 255.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while SYAAF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas SYAAF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYAAF's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to SYAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs STQNF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, STQNF has a market cap of 251.56M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while STQNF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas STQNF's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STQNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and STQNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs PMETF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PMETF has a market cap of 248.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PMETF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PMETF's P/E ratio is -52.73. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PMETF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PMETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs ERDCF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, ERDCF has a market cap of 239.09M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while ERDCF trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas ERDCF's P/E ratio is -65.86. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERDCF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to ERDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs RXRLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, RXRLF has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while RXRLF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas RXRLF's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RXRLF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to RXRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs LTHHF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, LTHHF has a market cap of 238.10M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while LTHHF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas LTHHF's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTHHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and LTHHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IPOAF vs BSRUF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, BSRUF has a market cap of 237.84M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while BSRUF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas BSRUF's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSRUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to BSRUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs PTTMF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, PTTMF has a market cap of 234.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while PTTMF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas PTTMF's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PTTMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF is less volatile compared to PTTMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPOAF.
IPOAF vs CILLF Comparison
IPOAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPOAF stands at 7.97B. In comparison, CILLF has a market cap of 232.44M. Regarding current trading prices, IPOAF is priced at $20.05, while CILLF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPOAF currently has a P/E ratio of 111.39, whereas CILLF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, IPOAF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CILLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IPOAF and CILLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).