IonQ, Inc.
IonQ, Inc. IONQ Peers
See (IONQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ | $41.45 | -3.54% | 10.5B | -26.57 | -$1.51 | N/A |
| ANET | $99.36 | -2.88% | 124.2B | 41.74 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $121.47 | -0.92% | 82.6B | 19.11 | $6.37 | +1.53% |
| STX | $147.49 | +2.19% | 30.8B | 20.87 | $6.95 | +1.97% |
| SMCI | $47.37 | -3.35% | 28.2B | 25.65 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $25.46 | +4.09% | 24B | 9.81 | $2.60 | +4.52% |
| WDC | $64.02 | +0.04% | 22.3B | 21.86 | $2.92 | +0.16% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $105.93 | -0.58% | 21.4B | 18.82 | $5.67 | +1.94% |
| PSTG | $55.40 | -3.79% | 18B | 145.29 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IONQ vs ANET Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while ANET trades at $99.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs DELL Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while DELL trades at $121.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs STX Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while STX trades at $147.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs SMCI Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while SMCI trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs HPQ Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while HPQ trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs WDC Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while WDC trades at $64.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs CAJ Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs NTAP Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while NTAP trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs PSTG Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while PSTG trades at $55.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 145.29. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs LOGI Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while LOGI trades at $91.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs IONQ-WT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IONQ-WT has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while IONQ-WT trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas IONQ-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IONQ-WT's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to IONQ-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs SNDKV Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs QBTS Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while QBTS trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -22.48. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs QBTS-WT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while QBTS-WT trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs RGTIW Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while RGTIW trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs RGTI Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while RGTI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs QUBT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while QUBT trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -34.52. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs CRCT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while CRCT trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs MKFG-WT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs CRSR Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 999M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while CRSR trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs SSYS Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 953.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while SSYS trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs RCAT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 681.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while RCAT trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -13.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs NNDM Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while NNDM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs DDD Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 212.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while DDD trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs CAN Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 173M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while CAN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs TIO Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while TIO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs DM Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs MICT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs MKFG Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs ALOT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while ALOT trades at $12.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs OSS Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while OSS trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs YIBO Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while YIBO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs INVE Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while INVE trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs ZSPC Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while ZSPC trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs STRC Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs QMCO Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while QMCO trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs TACT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while TACT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs FATH Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs KTCC Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while KTCC trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs EBON Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while EBON trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs UAVS Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while UAVS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs SGE Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs VLD Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs SCKT Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while SCKT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs VJET Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.
IONQ vs STRCW Comparison
IONQ plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ stands at 10.5B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ is priced at $41.45, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ currently has a P/E ratio of -26.57, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IONQ's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ.