IonQ, Inc. WT
IonQ, Inc. WT IONQ-WT Peers
See (IONQ-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ-WT | $28.30 | +11.90% | 10.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ANET | $97.24 | +2.16% | 122.1B | 41.03 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $113.77 | +1.74% | 77.8B | 17.69 | $6.43 | +1.63% |
| STX | $126.97 | -0.57% | 26.9B | 18.24 | $6.96 | +2.24% |
| SMCI | $41.55 | +1.91% | 24.8B | 22.58 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $25.18 | +1.92% | 23.6B | 9.68 | $2.60 | +4.50% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | N/A | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $106.25 | +1.58% | 21.9B | 18.74 | $5.67 | +1.96% |
| WDC | $55.45 | +0.73% | 19.3B | 18.99 | $2.92 | +0.18% |
| PSTG | $55.27 | +1.23% | 18.1B | 145.45 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IONQ-WT vs ANET Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while ANET trades at $97.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DELL Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while DELL trades at $113.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STX Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while STX trades at $126.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SMCI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while SMCI trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs HPQ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while HPQ trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CAJ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs NTAP Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while NTAP trades at $106.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs WDC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while WDC trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs PSTG Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while PSTG trades at $55.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 145.45. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs LOGI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while LOGI trades at $85.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs IONQ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while IONQ trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -25.83. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SNDKV Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QBTS-WT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while QBTS-WT trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QBTS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while QBTS trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -28.18. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RGTIW Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while RGTIW trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RGTI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while RGTI trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QUBT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while QUBT trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CRCT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while CRCT trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MKFG-WT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CRSR Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 971.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while CRSR trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -9.87. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SSYS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 878.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while SSYS trades at $10.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RCAT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 741.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while RCAT trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs NNDM Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 328.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while NNDM trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DDD Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while DDD trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CAN Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 171.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while CAN trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs TIO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DM Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MICT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs ZSPC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while ZSPC trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MKFG Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs INVE Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while INVE trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs YIBO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while YIBO trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs ALOT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while ALOT trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QMCO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 69.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while QMCO trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs OSS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while OSS trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STRC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs TACT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while TACT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs FATH Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs KTCC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while KTCC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs EBON Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while EBON trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs UAVS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while UAVS trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SGE Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs VLD Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SCKT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while SCKT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs VJET Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STRCW Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 10.2B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $28.30, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.