IonQ, Inc. WT
IonQ, Inc. WT IONQ-WT Peers
See (IONQ-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Computer Hardware Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IONQ-WT | $33.22 | +14.55% | 12B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ANET | $101.13 | +2.24% | 126.9B | 42.65 | $2.37 | N/A |
| DELL | $123.48 | +1.44% | 83.9B | 19.39 | $6.37 | +1.51% |
| STX | $151.94 | +4.76% | 32.2B | 21.86 | $6.95 | +1.89% |
| SMCI | $48.74 | +3.26% | 29.1B | 26.48 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HPQ | $25.85 | +1.37% | 24.3B | 9.94 | $2.60 | +4.42% |
| WDC | $65.78 | +3.04% | 22.9B | 22.51 | $2.92 | +0.15% |
| CAJ | $21.63 | -0.14% | 22B | 12.43 | $1.74 | N/A |
| NTAP | $107.61 | +0.86% | 21.6B | 18.97 | $5.67 | +1.93% |
| PSTG | $56.00 | +1.41% | 18.3B | 147.32 | $0.38 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IONQ-WT vs ANET Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, ANET has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while ANET trades at $101.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANET's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ANET's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to ANET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DELL Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, DELL has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while DELL trades at $123.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DELL's P/E ratio is 19.39. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DELL's ROE of -1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STX Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, STX has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while STX trades at $151.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STX's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STX's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to STX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SMCI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, SMCI has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while SMCI trades at $48.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMCI's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SMCI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SMCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs HPQ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, HPQ has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while HPQ trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPQ's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HPQ's ROE of -12.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to HPQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs WDC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, WDC has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while WDC trades at $65.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WDC's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WDC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to WDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CAJ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, CAJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while CAJ trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAJ's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs NTAP Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, NTAP has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while NTAP trades at $107.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTAP's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NTAP's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to NTAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs PSTG Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, PSTG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while PSTG trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSTG's P/E ratio is 147.32. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PSTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to PSTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs LOGI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, LOGI has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while LOGI trades at $92.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOGI's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LOGI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to LOGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs IONQ Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, IONQ has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while IONQ trades at $44.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IONQ's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IONQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to IONQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SNDKV Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, SNDKV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while SNDKV trades at $50.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNDKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SNDKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QBTS-WT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, QBTS-WT has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while QBTS-WT trades at $11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS-WT's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to QBTS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QBTS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, QBTS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while QBTS trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBTS's P/E ratio is -24.23. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QBTS's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to QBTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RGTIW Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, RGTIW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while RGTIW trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTIW's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTIW's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to RGTIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RGTI Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, RGTI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while RGTI trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGTI's P/E ratio is -16.34. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RGTI's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to RGTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QUBT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, QUBT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while QUBT trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUBT's P/E ratio is -38.24. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QUBT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to QUBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CRCT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, CRCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while CRCT trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRCT's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRCT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CRSR Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, CRSR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while CRSR trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRSR's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRSR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CRSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MKFG-WT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, MKFG-WT has a market cap of 999.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while MKFG-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG-WT's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SSYS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, SSYS has a market cap of 974M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while SSYS trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSYS's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SSYS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SSYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs RCAT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, RCAT has a market cap of 703.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while RCAT trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCAT's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RCAT's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to RCAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs NNDM Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, NNDM has a market cap of 339M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while NNDM trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNDM's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NNDM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to NNDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DDD Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, DDD has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while DDD trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DDD's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DDD's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs CAN Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, CAN has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while CAN trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAN's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CAN's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to CAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs TIO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, TIO has a market cap of 166.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while TIO trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIO's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TIO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to TIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs DM Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, DM has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while DM trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DM's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to DM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MICT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, MICT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while MICT trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICT's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MICT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MICT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs MKFG Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, MKFG has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while MKFG trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKFG's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MKFG's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to MKFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs ALOT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, ALOT has a market cap of 94.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while ALOT trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALOT's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALOT's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to ALOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs OSS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, OSS has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while OSS trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSS's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to OSS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to OSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs YIBO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, YIBO has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while YIBO trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YIBO's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to YIBO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to YIBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs INVE Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, INVE has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while INVE trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVE's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to INVE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to INVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs ZSPC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, ZSPC has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while ZSPC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZSPC's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ZSPC's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to ZSPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STRC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while STRC trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRC's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to STRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs QMCO Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, QMCO has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while QMCO trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QMCO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to QMCO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to QMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs TACT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, TACT has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while TACT trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACT's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to TACT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to TACT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs FATH Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, FATH has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while FATH trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FATH's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to FATH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to FATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs KTCC Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, KTCC has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while KTCC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KTCC's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KTCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to KTCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs EBON Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, EBON has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while EBON trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EBON's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EBON's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to EBON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs UAVS Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, UAVS has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while UAVS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAVS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UAVS's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to UAVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SGE Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, SGE has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while SGE trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGE's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SGE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs VLD Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, VLD has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while VLD trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VLD's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to VLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs SCKT Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, SCKT has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while SCKT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCKT's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCKT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to SCKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs VJET Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, VJET has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while VJET trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VJET's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VJET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is more volatile compared to VJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.
IONQ-WT vs STRCW Comparison
IONQ-WT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IONQ-WT stands at 12B. In comparison, STRCW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IONQ-WT is priced at $33.22, while STRCW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IONQ-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRCW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IONQ-WT's ROE is -0.63%, compared to STRCW's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IONQ-WT is less volatile compared to STRCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IONQ-WT.