Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.
Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTS | $4.58 | -1.08% | 8.5M | -1.13 | -$4.01 | N/A |
| NVO | $44.28 | -1.03% | 196.6B | 10.29 | $4.30 | +4.08% |
| VRTX | $436.58 | -0.08% | 110.8B | 25.88 | $16.87 | N/A |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| REGN | $629.68 | -9.82% | 64.8B | 15.35 | $40.99 | +0.57% |
| ARGX | $776.26 | -2.88% | 48B | 34.44 | $22.54 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $286.27 | -0.25% | 38.2B | 71.75 | $3.99 | N/A |
| RVMD | $144.37 | -0.89% | 30.7B | -20.31 | -$7.11 | N/A |
| UTHR | $566.99 | -0.28% | 24.1B | 20.95 | $27.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
INTS vs NVO Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NVO has a market cap of 196.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while NVO trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas NVO's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to NVO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to NVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check NVO's competition here
INTS vs VRTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while VRTX trades at $436.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 25.88. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check VRTX's competition here
INTS vs VRNA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check VRNA's competition here
INTS vs REGN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while REGN trades at $629.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check REGN's competition here
INTS vs ARGX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ARGX trades at $776.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ARGX's competition here
INTS vs SGEN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check SGEN's competition here
INTS vs ALNY Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ALNY trades at $286.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 71.75. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ALNY's competition here
INTS vs RVMD Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RVMD trades at $144.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -20.31. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RVMD's competition here
INTS vs UTHR Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while UTHR trades at $566.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check UTHR's competition here
INTS vs INSM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while INSM trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -18.60. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check INSM's competition here
INTS vs BNTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BNTX trades at $88.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -14.96. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BNTX's competition here
INTS vs RPRX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RPRX trades at $52.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RPRX's competition here
INTS vs ROIV Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ROIV trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -24.40. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ROIV's competition here
INTS vs BGNE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BGNE's competition here
INTS vs MRNA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MRNA trades at $48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MRNA's competition here
INTS vs INCY Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while INCY trades at $95.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check INCY's competition here
INTS vs DNA-WT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check DNA-WT's competition here
INTS vs GMAB Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while GMAB trades at $26.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check GMAB's competition here
INTS vs NBIX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while NBIX trades at $157.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check NBIX's competition here
INTS vs ASND Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ASND trades at $237.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is 26.82. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ASND's ROE of -56.42%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ASND's competition here
INTS vs JAZZ Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while JAZZ trades at $229.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 2086.82. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check JAZZ's competition here
INTS vs BBIO Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BBIO trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BBIO's competition here
INTS vs KRTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check KRTX's competition here
INTS vs EXEL Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while EXEL trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check EXEL's competition here
INTS vs SMMT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while SMMT trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check SMMT's competition here
INTS vs MDGL Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MDGL trades at $522.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MDGL's competition here
INTS vs IONS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while IONS trades at $72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -36.08. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check IONS's competition here
INTS vs AXSM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while AXSM trades at $227.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -61.29. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check AXSM's competition here
INTS vs RNAM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RNAM's competition here
INTS vs ARWR Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ARWR trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -32.58. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ARWR's competition here
INTS vs BMRN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BMRN trades at $49.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BMRN's competition here
INTS vs RXDX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RXDX's competition here
INTS vs CYTK Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CYTK trades at $75.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CYTK's competition here
INTS vs IMGN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check IMGN's competition here
INTS vs KRYS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while KRYS trades at $291.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 39.06. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check KRYS's competition here
INTS vs IBRX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while IBRX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check IBRX's competition here
INTS vs BPMC Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BPMC's competition here
INTS vs CERE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CERE's competition here
INTS vs HALO Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while HALO trades at $67.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check HALO's competition here
INTS vs ABVX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ABVX trades at $113.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -20.06. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ABVX's competition here
INTS vs MTSR Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MTSR's competition here
INTS vs NUVL Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while NUVL trades at $99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -16.49. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check NUVL's competition here
INTS vs PCVX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while PCVX trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check PCVX's competition here
INTS vs TECH Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while TECH trades at $44.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 63.47. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check TECH's competition here
INTS vs MRUS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MRUS's competition here
INTS vs PRAX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while PRAX trades at $320.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -23.92. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check PRAX's competition here
INTS vs ACLX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ACLX trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ACLX's competition here
INTS vs RETA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RETA's competition here
INTS vs KYMR Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while KYMR trades at $79.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check KYMR's competition here
INTS vs PTGX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while PTGX trades at $100.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -55.66. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check PTGX's competition here
INTS vs CELC Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CELC trades at $132.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -33.89. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CELC's competition here
INTS vs ALKS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ALKS trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ALKS's competition here
INTS vs CNTA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CNTA trades at $39.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CNTA's competition here
INTS vs TGTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while TGTX trades at $39.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check TGTX's competition here
INTS vs RYTM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RYTM trades at $86.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -27.73. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RYTM's competition here
INTS vs CORT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CORT trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 157.49. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CORT's competition here
INTS vs PTCT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while PTCT trades at $70.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is -27.61. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to PTCT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check PTCT's competition here
INTS vs BLTE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while BLTE trades at $142.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -61.86. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check BLTE's competition here
INTS vs SRRK Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while SRRK trades at $47.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check SRRK's competition here
INTS vs CDTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CDTX's competition here
INTS vs CGON Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CGON trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -26.89. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CGON's competition here
INTS vs ABCM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ABCM's competition here
INTS vs ISEE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ISEE's competition here
INTS vs IMVT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while IMVT trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check IMVT's competition here
INTS vs COGT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while COGT trades at $31.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to COGT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check COGT's competition here
INTS vs APLS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while APLS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to APLS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check APLS's competition here
INTS vs FBIOX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while FBIOX trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check FBIOX's competition here
INTS vs LQDA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while LQDA trades at $56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is 335.12. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LQDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check LQDA's competition here
INTS vs LEGN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while LEGN trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -19.55. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check LEGN's competition here
INTS vs APGE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while APGE trades at $78.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check APGE's competition here
INTS vs MIRM Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MIRM trades at $95.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MIRM's competition here
INTS vs TERN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while TERN trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.41. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check TERN's competition here
INTS vs CRSP Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CRSP trades at $48.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CRSP's competition here
INTS vs FOLD Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while FOLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check FOLD's competition here
INTS vs AKRO Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check AKRO's competition here
INTS vs ALPN Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ALPN's competition here
INTS vs CAI Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CAI trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CAI's competition here
INTS vs XENE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while XENE trades at $53.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check XENE's competition here
INTS vs OPT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to OPT's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check OPT's competition here
INTS vs SYRE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while SYRE trades at $70.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -33.06. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check SYRE's competition here
INTS vs LGND Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while LGND trades at $207.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check LGND's competition here
INTS vs MANE Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MANE has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MANE trades at $100.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MANE's P/E ratio is -37.98. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MANE's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to MANE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MANE's competition here
INTS vs MRTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check MRTX's competition here
INTS vs KNSA Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while KNSA trades at $53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 58.95. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check KNSA's competition here
INTS vs NAMS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while NAMS trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -19.18. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check NAMS's competition here
INTS vs TVTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TVTX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while TVTX trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas TVTX's P/E ratio is -85.78. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to TVTX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to TVTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check TVTX's competition here
INTS vs CPRX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CPRX trades at $31.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CPRX's competition here
INTS vs RYZB Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check RYZB's competition here
INTS vs CBAY Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CBAY's competition here
INTS vs CRNX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while CRNX trades at $34.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check CRNX's competition here
INTS vs ACAD Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ACAD trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ACAD's competition here
INTS vs SWTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check SWTX's competition here
INTS vs DNTH Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while DNTH trades at $83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to DNTH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check DNTH's competition here
INTS vs TLX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while TLX trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -514.00. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check TLX's competition here
INTS vs EWTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while EWTX trades at $31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -19.11. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check EWTX's competition here
INTS vs VKTX Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while VKTX trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check VKTX's competition here
INTS vs VCYT Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while VCYT trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 38.43. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check VCYT's competition here
INTS vs ERAS Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while ERAS trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is less volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check ERAS's competition here
INTS vs NAMSW Comparison May 2026
INTS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INTS stands at 8.5M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INTS is priced at $4.58, while NAMSW trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INTS currently has a P/E ratio of -1.13, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INTS's ROE is -1.37%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INTS is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INTS.Check NAMSW's competition here