Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (REGN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REGN | $707.33 | -0.25% | 73.6B | 17.44 | $40.99 | +0.50% |
| VRTX | $437.81 | +3.01% | 109.1B | 25.51 | $16.85 | N/A |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| ARGX | $800.34 | +1.66% | 48.4B | 34.75 | $22.51 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $288.40 | -2.54% | 39.4B | 74.32 | $3.97 | N/A |
| RVMD | $143.29 | +0.55% | 30.1B | -19.95 | -$7.11 | N/A |
| UTHR | $572.41 | +0.57% | 24B | 20.88 | $27.06 | N/A |
| BNTX | $93.11 | +0.10% | 23.8B | -15.85 | -$5.94 | N/A |
| INSM | $105.45 | +0.42% | 21.9B | -17.59 | -$5.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
REGN vs VRTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while VRTX trades at $437.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN and VRTX have similar daily volatility (3.14).Check VRTX's competition here
REGN vs VRNA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VRNA's competition here
REGN vs ARGX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ARGX trades at $800.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ARGX's competition here
REGN vs SGEN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SGEN's competition here
REGN vs ALNY Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ALNY trades at $288.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 74.32. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALNY's competition here
REGN vs RVMD Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RVMD trades at $143.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RVMD's competition here
REGN vs UTHR Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while UTHR trades at $572.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check UTHR's competition here
REGN vs BNTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BNTX trades at $93.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -15.85. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BNTX's competition here
REGN vs INSM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while INSM trades at $105.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -17.59. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check INSM's competition here
REGN vs RPRX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RPRX trades at $51.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RPRX's competition here
REGN vs MRNA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MRNA trades at $53.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -6.68. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRNA's competition here
REGN vs ROIV Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ROIV trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -24.41. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ROIV's competition here
REGN vs BGNE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BGNE's competition here
REGN vs INCY Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while INCY trades at $100.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check INCY's competition here
REGN vs DNA-WT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check DNA-WT's competition here
REGN vs GMAB Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while GMAB trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check GMAB's competition here
REGN vs ASND Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ASND trades at $237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASND's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ASND's competition here
REGN vs JAZZ Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while JAZZ trades at $225.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 2052.64. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check JAZZ's competition here
REGN vs SMMT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while SMMT trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SMMT's competition here
REGN vs BBIO Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BBIO trades at $65.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.02. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BBIO's competition here
REGN vs KRTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KRTX's competition here
REGN vs IONS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while IONS trades at $75.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -37.67. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IONS's competition here
REGN vs EXEL Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while EXEL trades at $49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check EXEL's competition here
REGN vs MDGL Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MDGL trades at $498.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -37.84. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MDGL's competition here
REGN vs RNAM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RNAM's competition here
REGN vs AXSM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while AXSM trades at $216.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -58.28. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AXSM's competition here
REGN vs BMRN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BMRN trades at $52.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 38.89. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BMRN's competition here
REGN vs ARWR Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ARWR trades at $77.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ARWR's competition here
REGN vs CYTK Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CYTK trades at $74.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CYTK's competition here
REGN vs RXDX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RXDX's competition here
REGN vs KRYS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while KRYS trades at $311.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 40.87. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KRYS's competition here
REGN vs IBRX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while IBRX trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -21.27. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IBRX's competition here
REGN vs IMGN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IMGN's competition here
REGN vs BPMC Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BPMC's competition here
REGN vs CERE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CERE's competition here
REGN vs ABVX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ABVX trades at $121.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -21.65. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ABVX's competition here
REGN vs NUVL Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while NUVL trades at $105.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NUVL's competition here
REGN vs PCVX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while PCVX trades at $53.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -7.69. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PCVX's competition here
REGN vs HALO Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while HALO trades at $64.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HALO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check HALO's competition here
REGN vs TECH Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while TECH trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 69.10. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TECH's competition here
REGN vs MTSR Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MTSR's competition here
REGN vs KYMR Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while KYMR trades at $85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -24.04. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KYMR's competition here
REGN vs PRAX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while PRAX trades at $331.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -24.61. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PRAX's competition here
REGN vs MRUS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRUS's competition here
REGN vs ACLX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ACLX trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ACLX's competition here
REGN vs RETA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RETA's competition here
REGN vs TGTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while TGTX trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TGTX's competition here
REGN vs RYTM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RYTM trades at $87.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -30.09. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RYTM's competition here
REGN vs PTGX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while PTGX trades at $102.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -54.90. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PTGX's competition here
REGN vs CELC Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CELC trades at $128.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -29.92. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CELC's competition here
REGN vs BLTE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BLTE trades at $153.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -67.34. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BLTE's competition here
REGN vs PTCT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while PTCT trades at $76.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PTCT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check PTCT's competition here
REGN vs COGT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while COGT trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -16.01. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COGT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check COGT's competition here
REGN vs CNTA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CNTA trades at $39.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -27.12. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CNTA's competition here
REGN vs IMVT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while IMVT trades at $28.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check IMVT's competition here
REGN vs CGON Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CGON trades at $69.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -33.47. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CGON's competition here
REGN vs ALKS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ALKS trades at $35.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALKS's competition here
REGN vs CDTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CDTX's competition here
REGN vs CORT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CORT trades at $52.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 149.37. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CORT's competition here
REGN vs SRRK Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while SRRK trades at $48.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -14.71. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SRRK's competition here
REGN vs ABCM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ABCM's competition here
REGN vs ISEE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ISEE's competition here
REGN vs MIRM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MIRM trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MIRM's competition here
REGN vs CRSP Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CRSP trades at $54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CRSP's competition here
REGN vs APLS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while APLS trades at $41.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APLS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check APLS's competition here
REGN vs LEGN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while LEGN trades at $26.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -17.36. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LEGN's competition here
REGN vs FBIOX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while FBIOX trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check FBIOX's competition here
REGN vs APGE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while APGE trades at $85.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -19.68. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check APGE's competition here
REGN vs TERN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while TERN trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.41. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TERN's competition here
REGN vs CAI Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CAI trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CAI's competition here
REGN vs FOLD Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while FOLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check FOLD's competition here
REGN vs SYRE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while SYRE trades at $77.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -35.40. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SYRE's competition here
REGN vs NAMS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while NAMS trades at $39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -21.76. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NAMS's competition here
REGN vs AKRO Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check AKRO's competition here
REGN vs ALPN Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ALPN's competition here
REGN vs XENE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while XENE trades at $55.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check XENE's competition here
REGN vs LGND Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while LGND trades at $221.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LGND's competition here
REGN vs MANE Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MANE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MANE trades at $109.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MANE's P/E ratio is -44.48. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MANE's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to MANE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MANE's competition here
REGN vs KNSA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while KNSA trades at $58.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 61.68. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check KNSA's competition here
REGN vs OPT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPT's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check OPT's competition here
REGN vs MRTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check MRTX's competition here
REGN vs TVTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TVTX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while TVTX trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas TVTX's P/E ratio is -85.20. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TVTX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to TVTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TVTX's competition here
REGN vs CRNX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CRNX trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CRNX's competition here
REGN vs ACAD Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ACAD trades at $22.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ACAD's competition here
REGN vs CPRX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CPRX trades at $31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CPRX's competition here
REGN vs EWTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while EWTX trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -21.28. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check EWTX's competition here
REGN vs RYZB Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check RYZB's competition here
REGN vs LQDA Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while LQDA trades at $51.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is -52.98. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LQDA's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check LQDA's competition here
REGN vs CBAY Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check CBAY's competition here
REGN vs VKTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while VKTX trades at $31.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VKTX's competition here
REGN vs TLX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while TLX trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -534.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check TLX's competition here
REGN vs SWTX Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check SWTX's competition here
REGN vs DNTH Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while DNTH trades at $87.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -20.63. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNTH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check DNTH's competition here
REGN vs BEAM Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, BEAM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while BEAM trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas BEAM's P/E ratio is -65.96. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BEAM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to BEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check BEAM's competition here
REGN vs VCYT Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while VCYT trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check VCYT's competition here
REGN vs NAMSW Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while NAMSW trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check NAMSW's competition here
REGN vs ERAS Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ERAS trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ERAS's competition here
REGN vs DNLI Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while DNLI trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check DNLI's competition here
REGN vs ANAB Comparison May 2026
REGN plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REGN stands at 73.6B. In comparison, ANAB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, REGN is priced at $707.33, while ANAB trades at $67.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REGN currently has a P/E ratio of 17.44, whereas ANAB's P/E ratio is -150.72. In terms of profitability, REGN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANAB's ROE of +18.14%. Regarding short-term risk, REGN is less volatile compared to ANAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REGN.Check ANAB's competition here