Inox Wind Limited
Inox Wind Limited (INOXWIND.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INOXWIND.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INOXWIND.BO | ₹96.55 | +0.00% | 167B | 35.27 | ₹2.74 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.NS | ₹976.50 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 112.59 | ₹8.60 | N/A |
| ADANIGREEN.BO | ₹976.50 | +0.00% | 1.6T | 113.33 | ₹8.54 | N/A |
| ENRIN.NS | ₹2,758.90 | +0.04% | 988.1B | 83.35 | ₹33.29 | +0.14% |
| NTPCGREEN.NS | ₹90.48 | -0.03% | 760.8B | 130.86 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| NHPC.NS | ₹74.36 | +0.00% | 748.1B | 48.99 | ₹1.52 | +2.56% |
| NHPC.BO | ₹74.37 | +0.00% | 747.7B | 48.97 | ₹1.52 | +2.56% |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹45.25 | +0.00% | 609.7B | 18.84 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹45.29 | +0.00% | 609.3B | 18.83 | ₹2.36 | N/A |
| SJVN.NS | ₹75.14 | +0.00% | 295.9B | 45.91 | ₹1.64 | +1.94% |
Stock Comparison
INOXWIND.BO vs ADANIGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while ADANIGREEN.NS trades at ₹976.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ADANIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 112.59. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADANIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs ADANIGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, ADANIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while ADANIGREEN.BO trades at ₹976.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ADANIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 113.33. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADANIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check ADANIGREEN.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs ENRIN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, ENRIN.NS has a market cap of 988.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while ENRIN.NS trades at ₹2,758.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ENRIN.NS's P/E ratio is 83.35. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENRIN.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to ENRIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check ENRIN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs NTPCGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, NTPCGREEN.NS has a market cap of 760.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while NTPCGREEN.NS trades at ₹90.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas NTPCGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 130.86. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTPCGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to NTPCGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check NTPCGREEN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs NHPC.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, NHPC.NS has a market cap of 748.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while NHPC.NS trades at ₹74.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas NHPC.NS's P/E ratio is 48.99. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHPC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check NHPC.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs NHPC.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, NHPC.BO has a market cap of 747.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while NHPC.BO trades at ₹74.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas NHPC.BO's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NHPC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to NHPC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check NHPC.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs SUZLON.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 609.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹45.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs SUZLON.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 609.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹45.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs SJVN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, SJVN.NS has a market cap of 295.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while SJVN.NS trades at ₹75.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SJVN.NS's P/E ratio is 45.91. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJVN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to SJVN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check SJVN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs SJVN.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, SJVN.BO has a market cap of 295.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while SJVN.BO trades at ₹75.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SJVN.BO's P/E ratio is 45.88. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJVN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to SJVN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check SJVN.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 167.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹96.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.28. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs ACMESOLAR.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.NS has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while ACMESOLAR.NS trades at ₹228.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ACMESOLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACMESOLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check ACMESOLAR.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs ACMESOLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, ACMESOLAR.BO has a market cap of 140.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while ACMESOLAR.BO trades at ₹229.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas ACMESOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ACMESOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to ACMESOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check ACMESOLAR.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs IWEL.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, IWEL.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while IWEL.BO trades at ₹10,301.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas IWEL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.28. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IWEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to IWEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check IWEL.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs IWEL.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, IWEL.NS has a market cap of 124B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while IWEL.NS trades at ₹10,293.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas IWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 89.29. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IWEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to IWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check IWEL.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs WAAREERTL.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.NS has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while WAAREERTL.NS trades at ₹883.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas WAAREERTL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WAAREERTL.NS's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check WAAREERTL.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs KPIGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.NS has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while KPIGREEN.NS trades at ₹394.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas KPIGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPIGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check KPIGREEN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs KPIGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, KPIGREEN.BO has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while KPIGREEN.BO trades at ₹395.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas KPIGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPIGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to KPIGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check KPIGREEN.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs INOXGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.NS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while INOXGREEN.NS trades at ₹180.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas INOXGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 109.36. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INOXGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check INOXGREEN.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs INOXGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, INOXGREEN.BO has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while INOXGREEN.BO trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas INOXGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 108.68. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INOXGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to INOXGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check INOXGREEN.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs RTNPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while RTNPOWER.NS trades at ₹8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas RTNPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTNPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check RTNPOWER.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs RTNPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, RTNPOWER.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while RTNPOWER.BO trades at ₹8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas RTNPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RTNPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to RTNPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check RTNPOWER.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs BFUTILITIE.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while BFUTILITIE.BO trades at ₹504.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas BFUTILITIE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFUTILITIE.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs BFUTILITIE.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, BFUTILITIE.NS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while BFUTILITIE.NS trades at ₹505.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas BFUTILITIE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFUTILITIE.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to BFUTILITIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check BFUTILITIE.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs INDOWIND.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, INDOWIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while INDOWIND.NS trades at ₹10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas INDOWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 114.11. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOWIND.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to INDOWIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check INDOWIND.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs INDOWIND.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, INDOWIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while INDOWIND.BO trades at ₹10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas INDOWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDOWIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to INDOWIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check INDOWIND.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs KARMAENG.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, KARMAENG.BO has a market cap of 538M. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while KARMAENG.BO trades at ₹44.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas KARMAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 96.88. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KARMAENG.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to KARMAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check KARMAENG.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs KARMAENG.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, KARMAENG.NS has a market cap of 520.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while KARMAENG.NS trades at ₹46.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas KARMAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 93.77. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KARMAENG.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to KARMAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check KARMAENG.NS's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs SMEL.BO Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, SMEL.BO has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while SMEL.BO trades at ₹8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas SMEL.BO's P/E ratio is 437.50. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMEL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is more volatile compared to SMEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check SMEL.BO's competition here
INOXWIND.BO vs KPIGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
INOXWIND.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INOXWIND.BO stands at 167B. In comparison, KPIGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INOXWIND.BO is priced at ₹96.55, while KPIGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INOXWIND.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 35.27, whereas KPIGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, INOXWIND.BO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, INOXWIND.BO is less volatile compared to KPIGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INOXWIND.BO.Check KPIGLOBAL.NS's competition here