Interiors & More Ltd.
Interiors & More Ltd. (INM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INM.NS | ₹170.00 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 9.93 | ₹17.12 | N/A |
| TIINDIA.BO | ₹2,801.50 | -5.13% | 569.2B | 94.86 | ₹31.00 | +0.12% |
| GODREJIND.NS | ₹1,153.15 | +5.68% | 361.4B | 36.98 | ₹29.02 | N/A |
| GODREJIND.BO | ₹1,152.00 | +6.03% | 361.1B | 37.47 | ₹28.61 | N/A |
| 3MINDIA.NS | ₹31,195.00 | +0.63% | 350B | 92.34 | ₹336.47 | +1.72% |
| 3MINDIA.BO | ₹31,290.85 | +1.08% | 349.3B | 92.12 | ₹336.61 | +1.72% |
| CARBORUNIV.NS | ₹1,037.35 | +2.85% | 196.8B | 80.04 | ₹12.91 | +0.39% |
| NAVA.NS | ₹703.60 | +0.87% | 196.1B | 22.03 | ₹31.46 | +1.30% |
| NAVA.BO | ₹703.40 | +0.93% | 196.1B | 22.05 | ₹31.43 | +1.30% |
| CARBORUNIV.BO | ₹1,038.10 | +2.75% | 196.1B | 79.57 | ₹12.94 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
INM.NS vs TIINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 569.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while TIINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,801.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas TIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 94.86. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check TIINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs GODREJIND.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJIND.NS has a market cap of 361.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while GODREJIND.NS trades at ₹1,153.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas GODREJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.98. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GODREJIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs GODREJIND.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJIND.BO has a market cap of 361.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while GODREJIND.BO trades at ₹1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas GODREJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GODREJIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs 3MINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.NS has a market cap of 350B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while 3MINDIA.NS trades at ₹31,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas 3MINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 92.34. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to 3MINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to 3MINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check 3MINDIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs 3MINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.BO has a market cap of 349.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while 3MINDIA.BO trades at ₹31,290.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas 3MINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 92.12. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to 3MINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to 3MINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check 3MINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs CARBORUNIV.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.NS has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CARBORUNIV.NS trades at ₹1,037.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CARBORUNIV.NS's P/E ratio is 80.04. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARBORUNIV.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CARBORUNIV.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NAVA.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVA.NS has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NAVA.NS trades at ₹703.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NAVA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAVA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NAVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NAVA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NAVA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVA.BO has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NAVA.BO trades at ₹703.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NAVA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAVA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NAVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NAVA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs CARBORUNIV.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.BO has a market cap of 196.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CARBORUNIV.BO trades at ₹1,038.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CARBORUNIV.BO's P/E ratio is 79.57. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARBORUNIV.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CARBORUNIV.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs JSWHL.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWHL.BO has a market cap of 139B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while JSWHL.BO trades at ₹12,514.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas JSWHL.BO's P/E ratio is 97.09. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSWHL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JSWHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JSWHL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs JSWHL.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWHL.NS has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while JSWHL.NS trades at ₹12,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas JSWHL.NS's P/E ratio is 96.84. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSWHL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JSWHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JSWHL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SWANCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWANCORP.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SWANCORP.BO trades at ₹323.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SWANCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -83.70. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWANCORP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SWANCORP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SWANCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWANCORP.NS has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SWANCORP.NS trades at ₹323.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SWANCORP.NS's P/E ratio is -83.61. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWANCORP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SWANCORP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CYIENT.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYIENT.NS has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CYIENT.NS trades at ₹871.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CYIENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CYIENT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CYIENT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CYIENT.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYIENT.BO has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CYIENT.BO trades at ₹873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CYIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CYIENT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CYIENT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MMTC.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MMTC.NS has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while MMTC.NS trades at ₹64.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas MMTC.NS's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MMTC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MMTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MMTC.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs MMTC.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MMTC.BO has a market cap of 97.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while MMTC.BO trades at ₹64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas MMTC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.82. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MMTC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MMTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MMTC.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs NESCO.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NESCO.NS has a market cap of 88B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NESCO.NS trades at ₹1,240.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NESCO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NESCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NESCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NESCO.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NESCO.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NESCO.BO has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NESCO.BO trades at ₹1,240.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NESCO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NESCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NESCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NESCO.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,833.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,834.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SINDHUTRAD.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SINDHUTRAD.NS trades at ₹23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SINDHUTRAD.NS's P/E ratio is -145.81. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SINDHUTRAD.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SINDHUTRAD.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.BO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SINDHUTRAD.BO trades at ₹23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SINDHUTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is -93.08. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SINDHUTRAD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs BALMLAWRIE.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while BALMLAWRIE.NS trades at ₹194.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas BALMLAWRIE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BALMLAWRIE.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BALMLAWRIE.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while BALMLAWRIE.BO trades at ₹194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas BALMLAWRIE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BALMLAWRIE.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MSTCLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while MSTCLTD.NS trades at ₹426.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas MSTCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MSTCLTD.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs MSTCLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.BO has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while MSTCLTD.BO trades at ₹426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas MSTCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTCLTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MSTCLTD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SBC.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBC.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SBC.BO trades at ₹33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SBC.BO's P/E ratio is 89.97. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBC.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SBC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SBC.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SBC.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBC.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SBC.NS trades at ₹33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SBC.NS's P/E ratio is 89.82. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBC.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SBC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SBC.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NIBE.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹998.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is -212.42. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs KRYSTAL.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRYSTAL.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while KRYSTAL.NS trades at ₹602.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas KRYSTAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYSTAL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KRYSTAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KRYSTAL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ZUARIIND.BO trades at ₹255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ZUARIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIIND.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ZUARIIND.NS trades at ₹254.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ZUARIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs PVP.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while PVP.NS trades at ₹27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -87.66. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check PVP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs PVP.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while PVP.BO trades at ₹27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -87.47. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check PVP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs STCINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while STCINDIA.NS trades at ₹116.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas STCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STCINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check STCINDIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs STCINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while STCINDIA.BO trades at ₹116.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas STCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STCINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check STCINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs CAREERP.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAREERP.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CAREERP.NS trades at ₹377.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CAREERP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAREERP.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CAREERP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CAREERP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CAREERP.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAREERP.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while CAREERP.BO trades at ₹376.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas CAREERP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAREERP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CAREERP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CAREERP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs JPASSOCIAT.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while JPASSOCIAT.NS trades at ₹2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas JPASSOCIAT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and JPASSOCIAT.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPASSOCIAT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs JPASSOCIAT.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while JPASSOCIAT.BO trades at ₹2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas JPASSOCIAT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JPASSOCIAT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs KOTHARIPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while KOTHARIPRO.NS trades at ₹73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas KOTHARIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KOTHARIPRO.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs KOTHARIPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while KOTHARIPRO.BO trades at ₹72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas KOTHARIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KOTHARIPRO.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ROSSELLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ROSSELLIND.NS trades at ₹55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ROSSELLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROSSELLIND.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROSSELLIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ROSSELLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ROSSELLIND.BO trades at ₹55.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ROSSELLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROSSELLIND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROSSELLIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs GILLANDERS.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while GILLANDERS.NS trades at ₹93.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas GILLANDERS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GILLANDERS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GILLANDERS.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SORILINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SORILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SORILINFRA.NS trades at ₹65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SORILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SORILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SORILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SORILINFRA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs GILLANDERS.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while GILLANDERS.BO trades at ₹94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas GILLANDERS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GILLANDERS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and GILLANDERS.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GILLANDERS.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs IPRINGLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPRINGLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while IPRINGLTD.BO trades at ₹119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas IPRINGLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 159.93. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IPRINGLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and IPRINGLTD.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IPRINGLTD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SIGIND.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIGIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SIGIND.BO trades at ₹51.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SIGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SIGIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs EXCEL.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while EXCEL.BO trades at ₹1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas EXCEL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCEL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to EXCEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check EXCEL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs EXCEL.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while EXCEL.NS trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas EXCEL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCEL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to EXCEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check EXCEL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs LANDSMILL.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while LANDSMILL.BO trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas LANDSMILL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDSMILL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LANDSMILL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs LANDSMILL.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while LANDSMILL.NS trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas LANDSMILL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDSMILL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LANDSMILL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ROLLT.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 560.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ROLLT.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 547.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BFFL.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFFL.BO has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while BFFL.BO trades at ₹63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas BFFL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BFFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BFFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BFFL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MSRINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSRINDIA.BO has a market cap of 301.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while MSRINDIA.BO trades at ₹4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas MSRINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 160.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSRINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and MSRINDIA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSRINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ASINPET.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASINPET.BO has a market cap of 232.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ASINPET.BO trades at ₹9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ASINPET.BO's P/E ratio is 135.14. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASINPET.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ASINPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ASINPET.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFSL.BO has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while SFSL.BO trades at ₹95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas SFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.93. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFSL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and SFSL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs LEXORAA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LEXORAA.BO has a market cap of 77.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while LEXORAA.BO trades at ₹17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas LEXORAA.BO's P/E ratio is -50.69. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LEXORAA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LEXORAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LEXORAA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs AMBIT.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBIT.BO has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while AMBIT.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas AMBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBIT.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check AMBIT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs VASUDHAGAM.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VASUDHAGAM.BO has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while VASUDHAGAM.BO trades at ₹1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas VASUDHAGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and VASUDHAGAM.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VASUDHAGAM.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ALCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALCHEM.NS has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ALCHEM.NS trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ALCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and ALCHEM.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALCHEM.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ZSARVAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZSARVAMA.BO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ZSARVAMA.BO trades at ₹52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ZSARVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSARVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and ZSARVAMA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSARVAMA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIGLOB.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIGLOB.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while ZUARIGLOB.NS trades at ₹145.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas ZUARIGLOB.NS's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIGLOB.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NBVENTURES.NS Comparison May 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NBVENTURES.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹170.00, while NBVENTURES.NS trades at ₹200.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.93, whereas NBVENTURES.NS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NBVENTURES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NBVENTURES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NBVENTURES.NS's competition here