Interiors & More Ltd. (INM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INM.NS | ₹164.85 | +0.00% | 1.2B | 9.63 | ₹17.12 | N/A |
| TIINDIA.NS | ₹3,056.10 | -2.33% | 591.5B | 93.03 | ₹32.85 | +0.11% |
| TIINDIA.BO | ₹3,036.30 | -2.78% | 587.7B | 92.57 | ₹32.80 | +0.11% |
| 3MINDIA.NS | ₹31,540.00 | -1.42% | 355.3B | 67.98 | ₹463.93 | +1.70% |
| 3MINDIA.BO | ₹31,533.40 | -1.46% | 355.2B | 67.90 | ₹464.38 | +1.70% |
| GODREJIND.BO | ₹1,033.55 | -0.69% | 348.1B | 36.13 | ₹28.61 | N/A |
| GODREJIND.NS | ₹1,033.40 | -0.88% | 348.1B | 28.08 | ₹36.80 | N/A |
| CARBORUNIV.NS | ₹1,054.50 | +1.41% | 200.9B | 102.48 | ₹10.29 | +0.38% |
| CARBORUNIV.BO | ₹1,053.85 | +0.49% | 200.7B | 81.44 | ₹12.94 | +0.38% |
| NAVA.BO | ₹586.40 | -1.81% | 166B | 21.05 | ₹27.86 | +1.54% |
Stock Comparison
INM.NS vs TIINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 591.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while TIINDIA.NS trades at ₹3,056.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 93.03. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check TIINDIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs TIINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 587.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while TIINDIA.BO trades at ₹3,036.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas TIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 92.57. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check TIINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs 3MINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.NS has a market cap of 355.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while 3MINDIA.NS trades at ₹31,540.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas 3MINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 67.98. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to 3MINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to 3MINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check 3MINDIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs 3MINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.BO has a market cap of 355.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while 3MINDIA.BO trades at ₹31,533.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas 3MINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 67.90. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to 3MINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to 3MINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check 3MINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs GODREJIND.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJIND.BO has a market cap of 348.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while GODREJIND.BO trades at ₹1,033.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GODREJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.13. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJIND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GODREJIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs GODREJIND.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GODREJIND.NS has a market cap of 348.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while GODREJIND.NS trades at ₹1,033.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GODREJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 28.08. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GODREJIND.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GODREJIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CARBORUNIV.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.NS has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CARBORUNIV.NS trades at ₹1,054.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CARBORUNIV.NS's P/E ratio is 102.48. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARBORUNIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CARBORUNIV.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CARBORUNIV.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.BO has a market cap of 200.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CARBORUNIV.BO trades at ₹1,053.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CARBORUNIV.BO's P/E ratio is 81.44. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CARBORUNIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CARBORUNIV.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs NAVA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVA.BO has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while NAVA.BO trades at ₹586.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NAVA.BO's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAVA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NAVA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NAVA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs NAVA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NAVA.NS has a market cap of 165.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while NAVA.NS trades at ₹586.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NAVA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAVA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NAVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NAVA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs JSWHL.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWHL.BO has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while JSWHL.BO trades at ₹12,291.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas JSWHL.BO's P/E ratio is 92.83. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSWHL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JSWHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JSWHL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs JSWHL.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JSWHL.NS has a market cap of 136.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while JSWHL.NS trades at ₹12,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas JSWHL.NS's P/E ratio is 92.65. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSWHL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JSWHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JSWHL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs MMTC.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MMTC.BO has a market cap of 98.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while MMTC.BO trades at ₹65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MMTC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MMTC.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MMTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MMTC.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MMTC.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MMTC.NS has a market cap of 98B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while MMTC.NS trades at ₹65.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MMTC.NS's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MMTC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MMTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MMTC.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SWANCORP.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWANCORP.NS has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SWANCORP.NS trades at ₹305.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SWANCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWANCORP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SWANCORP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SWANCORP.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SWANCORP.BO has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SWANCORP.BO trades at ₹305.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SWANCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SWANCORP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SWANCORP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs CYIENT.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYIENT.BO has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CYIENT.BO trades at ₹863.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CYIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CYIENT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CYIENT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs CYIENT.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CYIENT.NS has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CYIENT.NS trades at ₹862.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CYIENT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.39. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CYIENT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CYIENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CYIENT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NESCO.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NESCO.BO has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while NESCO.BO trades at ₹1,085.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NESCO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NESCO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NESCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NESCO.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs NESCO.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NESCO.NS has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while NESCO.NS trades at ₹1,084.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NESCO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NESCO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NESCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NESCO.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,744.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 49.17. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,741.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 102.98. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SINDHUTRAD.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.NS has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SINDHUTRAD.NS trades at ₹24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SINDHUTRAD.NS's P/E ratio is 92.26. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SINDHUTRAD.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SINDHUTRAD.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SINDHUTRAD.BO trades at ₹24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SINDHUTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is -99.28. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SINDHUTRAD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MSTCLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while MSTCLTD.NS trades at ₹490.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MSTCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MSTCLTD.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs MSTCLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while MSTCLTD.BO trades at ₹489.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MSTCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSTCLTD.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check MSTCLTD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs BALMLAWRIE.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.NS has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while BALMLAWRIE.NS trades at ₹171.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BALMLAWRIE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BALMLAWRIE.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BALMLAWRIE.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while BALMLAWRIE.BO trades at ₹171.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BALMLAWRIE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BALMLAWRIE.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SBC.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBC.NS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SBC.NS trades at ₹36.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SBC.NS's P/E ratio is 69.04. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBC.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SBC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SBC.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SBC.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBC.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SBC.BO trades at ₹36.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SBC.BO's P/E ratio is 68.75. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBC.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SBC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SBC.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs PVP.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while PVP.NS trades at ₹31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -127.08. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check PVP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs PVP.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while PVP.BO trades at ₹31.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -127.08. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check PVP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs KRYSTAL.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRYSTAL.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while KRYSTAL.NS trades at ₹576.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KRYSTAL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KRYSTAL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KRYSTAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KRYSTAL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.BO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ZUARIIND.BO trades at ₹245.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ZUARIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ZUARIIND.NS trades at ₹245.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ZUARIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs STCINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while STCINDIA.BO trades at ₹120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas STCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.13. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STCINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check STCINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs STCINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while STCINDIA.NS trades at ₹119.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas STCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to STCINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to STCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check STCINDIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CAREERP.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAREERP.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CAREERP.NS trades at ₹377.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CAREERP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAREERP.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CAREERP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CAREERP.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs CAREERP.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAREERP.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while CAREERP.BO trades at ₹376.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas CAREERP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CAREERP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to CAREERP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check CAREERP.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs JPASSOCIAT.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while JPASSOCIAT.NS trades at ₹2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas JPASSOCIAT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and JPASSOCIAT.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPASSOCIAT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs JPASSOCIAT.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while JPASSOCIAT.BO trades at ₹2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas JPASSOCIAT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check JPASSOCIAT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs KOTHARIPRO.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while KOTHARIPRO.NS trades at ₹71.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KOTHARIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KOTHARIPRO.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs KOTHARIPRO.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while KOTHARIPRO.BO trades at ₹70.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas KOTHARIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check KOTHARIPRO.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ROSSELLIND.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ROSSELLIND.NS trades at ₹54.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROSSELLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROSSELLIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROSSELLIND.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ROSSELLIND.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ROSSELLIND.BO trades at ₹54.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROSSELLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROSSELLIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROSSELLIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SORILINFRA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SORILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SORILINFRA.NS trades at ₹65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SORILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SORILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SORILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SORILINFRA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ESSENTIA.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESSENTIA.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ESSENTIA.NS trades at ₹1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ESSENTIA.NS's P/E ratio is 55.67. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ESSENTIA.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ESSENTIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ESSENTIA.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs GILLANDERS.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while GILLANDERS.BO trades at ₹87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GILLANDERS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GILLANDERS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GILLANDERS.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs GILLANDERS.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while GILLANDERS.NS trades at ₹87.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas GILLANDERS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GILLANDERS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check GILLANDERS.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ESSENTIA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ESSENTIA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ESSENTIA.BO trades at ₹1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ESSENTIA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ESSENTIA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ESSENTIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ESSENTIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs IPRINGLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPRINGLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while IPRINGLTD.BO trades at ₹117.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas IPRINGLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 86.65. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IPRINGLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to IPRINGLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check IPRINGLTD.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs EXCEL.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while EXCEL.BO trades at ₹1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas EXCEL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCEL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to EXCEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check EXCEL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs EXCEL.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXCEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while EXCEL.NS trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas EXCEL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCEL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to EXCEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check EXCEL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs SIGIND.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIGIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SIGIND.BO trades at ₹48.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SIGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SIGIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check SIGIND.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs LANDSMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while LANDSMILL.BO trades at ₹0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LANDSMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDSMILL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LANDSMILL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs LANDSMILL.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while LANDSMILL.NS trades at ₹0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LANDSMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LANDSMILL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LANDSMILL.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ROLLT.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 582.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ROLLT.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs BFFL.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BFFL.BO has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while BFFL.BO trades at ₹63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas BFFL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BFFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to BFFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check BFFL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs MSRINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MSRINDIA.BO has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while MSRINDIA.BO trades at ₹4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas MSRINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -67.71. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSRINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and MSRINDIA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MSRINDIA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ASINPET.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ASINPET.BO has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ASINPET.BO trades at ₹9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ASINPET.BO's P/E ratio is 137.14. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASINPET.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ASINPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ASINPET.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs SFSL.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFSL.BO has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while SFSL.BO trades at ₹80.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas SFSL.BO's P/E ratio is -42.77. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SFSL.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and SFSL.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFSL.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs LEXORAA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LEXORAA.BO has a market cap of 75.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while LEXORAA.BO trades at ₹19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas LEXORAA.BO's P/E ratio is 321.00. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to LEXORAA.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to LEXORAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check LEXORAA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs AMBIT.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMBIT.BO has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while AMBIT.BO trades at ₹8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas AMBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.88. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMBIT.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check AMBIT.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs VASUDHAGAM.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VASUDHAGAM.BO has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while VASUDHAGAM.BO trades at ₹0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas VASUDHAGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and VASUDHAGAM.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VASUDHAGAM.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ALCHEM.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ALCHEM.NS has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ALCHEM.NS trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ALCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ALCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and ALCHEM.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALCHEM.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs ZSARVAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZSARVAMA.BO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ZSARVAMA.BO trades at ₹52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ZSARVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZSARVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS and ZSARVAMA.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZSARVAMA.BO's competition here
INM.NS vs ZUARIGLOB.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ZUARIGLOB.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while ZUARIGLOB.NS trades at ₹145.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas ZUARIGLOB.NS's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check ZUARIGLOB.NS's competition here
INM.NS vs NBVENTURES.NS Comparison June 2026
INM.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INM.NS stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NBVENTURES.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, INM.NS is priced at ₹164.85, while NBVENTURES.NS trades at ₹200.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 9.63, whereas NBVENTURES.NS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, INM.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NBVENTURES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INM.NS is less volatile compared to NBVENTURES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INM.NS.Check NBVENTURES.NS's competition here