Hindustan Foods Limited

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.NS has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while NESTLEIND.NS trades at ₹1,431.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas NESTLEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 78.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.NS's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to NESTLEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, NESTLEIND.BO has a market cap of 2.8T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while NESTLEIND.BO trades at ₹1,432.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas NESTLEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 84.48. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NESTLEIND.BO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to NESTLEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check NESTLEIND.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BRITANNIA.NS trades at ₹5,380.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BRITANNIA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.NS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BRITANNIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BRITANNIA.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BRITANNIA.BO trades at ₹5,377.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BRITANNIA.BO's P/E ratio is 56.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRITANNIA.BO's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BRITANNIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BRITANNIA.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TATACONSUM.BO trades at ₹1,230.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TATACONSUM.BO's P/E ratio is 79.06. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TATACONSUM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TATACONSUM.NS trades at ₹1,231.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TATACONSUM.NS's P/E ratio is 79.10. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACONSUM.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACONSUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACONSUM.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, PATANJALI.BO has a market cap of 500.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while PATANJALI.BO trades at ₹457.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas PATANJALI.BO's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, PATANJALI.NS has a market cap of 500.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while PATANJALI.NS trades at ₹456.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas PATANJALI.NS's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATANJALI.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PATANJALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PATANJALI.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, AWL.BO has a market cap of 258.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while AWL.BO trades at ₹199.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas AWL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AWL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AWL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, AWL.NS has a market cap of 258.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while AWL.NS trades at ₹199.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas AWL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AWL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AWL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AWL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HATSUN.NS has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HATSUN.NS trades at ₹921.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HATSUN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.25. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HATSUN.BO has a market cap of 209.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HATSUN.BO trades at ₹920.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HATSUN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HATSUN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HATSUN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HATSUN.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.BO has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while AVANTIFEED.BO trades at ₹1,256.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas AVANTIFEED.BO's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, AVANTIFEED.NS has a market cap of 180.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while AVANTIFEED.NS trades at ₹1,257.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas AVANTIFEED.NS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVANTIFEED.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to AVANTIFEED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check AVANTIFEED.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BIKAJI.BO has a market cap of 167.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BIKAJI.BO trades at ₹658.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BIKAJI.BO's P/E ratio is 67.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BIKAJI.NS has a market cap of 167.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BIKAJI.NS trades at ₹659.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BIKAJI.NS's P/E ratio is 67.92. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BIKAJI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BIKAJI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BIKAJI.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, CCL.BO has a market cap of 148.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while CCL.BO trades at ₹1,090.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas CCL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.66. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, CCL.NS has a market cap of 148.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while CCL.NS trades at ₹1,090.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas CCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CCL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, LTFOODS.BO has a market cap of 142.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while LTFOODS.BO trades at ₹404.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas LTFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, LTFOODS.NS has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while LTFOODS.NS trades at ₹404.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas LTFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to LTFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check LTFOODS.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BBTC.NS has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BBTC.NS trades at ₹1,496.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BBTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BBTC.BO has a market cap of 106.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BBTC.BO trades at ₹1,495.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BBTC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBTC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BBTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BBTC.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ORKLAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 86.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ORKLAINDIA.NS trades at ₹629.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ORKLAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 34.91. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ORKLAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ORKLAINDIA.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MANORAMA.NS has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MANORAMA.NS trades at ₹1,370.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MANORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.31. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MANORAMA.BO trades at ₹1,372.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MANORAMA.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, KRBL.BO has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while KRBL.BO trades at ₹328.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas KRBL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, KRBL.NS has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while KRBL.NS trades at ₹328.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas KRBL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRBL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRBL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GAEL.BO has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GAEL.BO trades at ₹162.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GAEL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GAEL.NS has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GAEL.NS trades at ₹161.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GAEL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.55. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GAEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GAEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GAEL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DAAWAT.NS has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DAAWAT.NS trades at ₹189.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DAAWAT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DAAWAT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DAAWAT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DAAWAT.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.BO has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TATACOFFEE.BO trades at ₹344.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TATACOFFEE.BO's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TATACOFFEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TATACOFFEE.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TATACOFFEE.NS has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TATACOFFEE.NS trades at ₹334.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TATACOFFEE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TATACOFFEE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HNDFDS.BO has daily volatility of 1.21 and TATACOFFEE.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check TATACOFFEE.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HNDFDS.NS has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HNDFDS.NS trades at ₹514.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HNDFDS.NS's P/E ratio is 45.27. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HNDFDS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HNDFDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HNDFDS.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.BO has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BECTORFOOD.BO trades at ₹181.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BECTORFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.99. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BECTORFOOD.NS has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BECTORFOOD.NS trades at ₹181.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BECTORFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BECTORFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BECTORFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BECTORFOOD.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TASTYBIT.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TASTYBIT.BO trades at ₹14,140.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TASTYBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 105.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBIT.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBIT.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GOPAL.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GOPAL.NS trades at ₹296.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GOPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 880.76. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOPAL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOPAL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GOKULAGRO.BO trades at ₹241.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GOKULAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GOKULAGRO.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GOKULAGRO.NS trades at ₹240.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GOKULAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKULAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKULAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKULAGRO.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ZYDUSWELL.NS trades at ₹495.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ZYDUSWELL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ZYDUSWELL.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ZYDUSWELL.BO trades at ₹496.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ZYDUSWELL.BO's P/E ratio is 77.28. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ZYDUSWELL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ZYDUSWELL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GRMOVER.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GRMOVER.NS trades at ₹169.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GRMOVER.NS's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GRMOVER.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GRMOVER.BO trades at ₹170.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GRMOVER.BO's P/E ratio is 53.58. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRMOVER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GRMOVER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GRMOVER.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HERITGFOOD.NS trades at ₹325.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HERITGFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HERITGFOOD.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HERITGFOOD.BO trades at ₹324.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HERITGFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HERITGFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HERITGFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HERITGFOOD.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, VADILALIND.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while VADILALIND.NS trades at ₹4,118.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas VADILALIND.NS's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, VADILALIND.BO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while VADILALIND.BO trades at ₹4,119.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas VADILALIND.BO's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VADILALIND.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to VADILALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check VADILALIND.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ATFL.NS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ATFL.NS trades at ₹785.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ATFL.NS's P/E ratio is 344.56. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ATFL.BO has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ATFL.BO trades at ₹784.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ATFL.BO's P/E ratio is 342.53. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATFL.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ATFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ATFL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ADFFOODS.NS trades at ₹264.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ADFFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.60. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ADFFOODS.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ADFFOODS.BO trades at ₹264.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ADFFOODS.BO's P/E ratio is 36.55. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADFFOODS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ADFFOODS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ADFFOODS.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, BNAGROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while BNAGROCHEM.BO trades at ₹288.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas BNAGROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to BNAGROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check BNAGROCHEM.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while PARAGMILK.BO trades at ₹213.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas PARAGMILK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, PARAGMILK.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while PARAGMILK.NS trades at ₹213.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas PARAGMILK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARAGMILK.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to PARAGMILK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check PARAGMILK.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SUNDROP.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SUNDROP.BO trades at ₹685.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SUNDROP.BO's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SUNDROP.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SUNDROP.NS trades at ₹682.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SUNDROP.NS's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNDROP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SUNDROP.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DIAMONDYD.BO trades at ₹983.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DIAMONDYD.BO's P/E ratio is 245.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DIAMONDYD.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DIAMONDYD.NS trades at ₹979.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DIAMONDYD.NS's P/E ratio is 244.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAMONDYD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DIAMONDYD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DIAMONDYD.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DFMFOODS.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DFMFOODS.NS trades at ₹461.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DFMFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is -47.58. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFMFOODS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to DFMFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DFMFOODS.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, TASTYBITE.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while TASTYBITE.NS trades at ₹7,400.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas TASTYBITE.NS's P/E ratio is 55.01. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TASTYBITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to TASTYBITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check TASTYBITE.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, CLSEL.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while CLSEL.NS trades at ₹260.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas CLSEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, CLSEL.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while CLSEL.BO trades at ₹262.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas CLSEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLSEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CLSEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CLSEL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HMAAGRO.BO trades at ₹23.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HMAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, HMAAGRO.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while HMAAGRO.NS trades at ₹23.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas HMAAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMAAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to HMAAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check HMAAGRO.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SKMEGGPROD.BO trades at ₹181.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SKMEGGPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SKMEGGPROD.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SKMEGGPROD.NS trades at ₹180.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SKMEGGPROD.NS's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SKMEGGPROD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SKMEGGPROD.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DVL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DVL.BO trades at ₹232.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DVL.BO's P/E ratio is -56.14. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DVL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DVL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DVL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DVL.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DVL.NS trades at ₹229.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DVL.NS's P/E ratio is -56.26. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DVL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DVL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, REGAAL.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while REGAAL.NS trades at ₹74.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas REGAAL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGAAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to REGAAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check REGAAL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, KRISHIVAL.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while KRISHIVAL.NS trades at ₹377.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas KRISHIVAL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.89. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRISHIVAL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHIVAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRISHIVAL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MUKKA.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MUKKA.NS trades at ₹22.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MUKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUKKA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MUKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MUKKA.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MCLEODRUSS.NS trades at ₹65.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MCLEODRUSS.NS's P/E ratio is -2.91. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MCLEODRUSS.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MCLEODRUSS.BO trades at ₹65.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MCLEODRUSS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is more volatile compared to MCLEODRUSS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MCLEODRUSS.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, EIFFL.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while EIFFL.NS trades at ₹220.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas EIFFL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.07. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIFFL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to EIFFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check EIFFL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SARVESHWAR.BO trades at ₹3.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SARVESHWAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SARVESHWAR.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SARVESHWAR.NS trades at ₹3.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SARVESHWAR.NS's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SARVESHWAR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SARVESHWAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SARVESHWAR.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SCPL.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SCPL.NS trades at ₹434.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, SCPL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while SCPL.BO trades at ₹438.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas SCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SCPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to SCPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check SCPL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, KRITINUT.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while KRITINUT.NS trades at ₹82.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas KRITINUT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, KRITINUT.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while KRITINUT.BO trades at ₹81.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas KRITINUT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRITINUT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to KRITINUT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check KRITINUT.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GOKUL.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GOKUL.NS trades at ₹41.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GOKUL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.01. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, GOKUL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while GOKUL.BO trades at ₹40.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas GOKUL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOKUL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to GOKUL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check GOKUL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, COASTCORP.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while COASTCORP.NS trades at ₹60.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas COASTCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, COASTCORP.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while COASTCORP.BO trades at ₹59.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas COASTCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COASTCORP.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to COASTCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check COASTCORP.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, FOODSIN.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while FOODSIN.BO trades at ₹54.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas FOODSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, FOODSIN.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while FOODSIN.NS trades at ₹54.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas FOODSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOODSIN.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to FOODSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check FOODSIN.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MEGASTAR.BO trades at ₹304.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MEGASTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MEGASTAR.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MEGASTAR.NS trades at ₹307.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MEGASTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 33.37. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MEGASTAR.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MEGASTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MEGASTAR.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, JAYSHREETEA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while JAYSHREETEA.BO trades at ₹107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas JAYSHREETEA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to JAYSHREETEA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check JAYSHREETEA.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, WATERBASE.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while WATERBASE.BO trades at ₹47.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas WATERBASE.BO's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, WATERBASE.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while WATERBASE.NS trades at ₹75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas WATERBASE.NS's P/E ratio is -53.19. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WATERBASE.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to WATERBASE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check WATERBASE.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, CHATHA.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while CHATHA.BO trades at ₹76.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas CHATHA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHATHA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to CHATHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check CHATHA.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MKPL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MKPL.BO trades at ₹5.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MKPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, MKPL.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while MKPL.NS trades at ₹5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas MKPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MKPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to MKPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check MKPL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, UMANGDAIR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while UMANGDAIR.BO trades at ₹76.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas UMANGDAIR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UMANGDAIR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to UMANGDAIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check UMANGDAIR.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DHUNTEAIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DHUNTEAIND.BO trades at ₹221.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DHUNTEAIND.BO's P/E ratio is 1.95. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DHUNTEAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DHUNTEAIND.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DTIL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DTIL.NS trades at ₹132.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DTIL.NS's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.NS's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, DTIL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while DTIL.BO trades at ₹130.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas DTIL.BO's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DTIL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to DTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check DTIL.BO's competition here

HNDFDS.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HNDFDS.BO stands at 62.2B. In comparison, ROML.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HNDFDS.BO is priced at ₹515.55, while ROML.NS trades at ₹47.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HNDFDS.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 45.46, whereas ROML.NS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, HNDFDS.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROML.NS's ROE of -2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HNDFDS.BO is less volatile compared to ROML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HNDFDS.BO.Check ROML.NS's competition here