I-Mab (IMAB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IMAB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMAB | $2.88 | -0.69% | 542M | -5.65 | -$0.51 | N/A |
| NVO | $43.79 | -0.22% | 195.1B | 10.38 | $4.23 | +4.11% |
| VRTX | $449.69 | +1.07% | 114.4B | 26.73 | $16.86 | N/A |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| REGN | $613.26 | +0.18% | 63.3B | 15.01 | $40.95 | +0.59% |
| ARGX | $879.70 | -1.55% | 54.7B | 39.28 | $22.51 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $279.21 | -1.29% | 38.4B | 72.13 | $3.99 | N/A |
| RVMDW | $6.12 | +3.03% | 35.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RVMD | $155.24 | +0.89% | 34B | -22.51 | -$7.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
IMAB vs NVO Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, NVO has a market cap of 195.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while NVO trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NVO's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to NVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check NVO's competition here
IMAB vs VRTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 114.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while VRTX trades at $449.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check VRTX's competition here
IMAB vs VRNA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check VRNA's competition here
IMAB vs REGN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while REGN trades at $613.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check REGN's competition here
IMAB vs ARGX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ARGX trades at $879.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 39.28. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ARGX's competition here
IMAB vs SGEN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check SGEN's competition here
IMAB vs ALNY Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ALNY trades at $279.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 72.13. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ALNY's competition here
IMAB vs RVMDW Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RVMDW has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RVMDW trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RVMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RVMDW's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to RVMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RVMDW's competition here
IMAB vs RVMD Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RVMD trades at $155.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -22.51. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RVMD's competition here
IMAB vs RPRX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RPRX trades at $54.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RPRX's competition here
IMAB vs UTHR Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while UTHR trades at $552.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check UTHR's competition here
IMAB vs BNTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BNTX trades at $90.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BNTX's competition here
IMAB vs ROIV Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ROIV trades at $29.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -55.61. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ROIV's competition here
IMAB vs INSM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while INSM trades at $94.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -16.92. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check INSM's competition here
IMAB vs MRNA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MRNA trades at $55.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MRNA's competition here
IMAB vs INCY Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while INCY trades at $100.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check INCY's competition here
IMAB vs BGNE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BGNE's competition here
IMAB vs DNA-WT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check DNA-WT's competition here
IMAB vs NBIX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while NBIX trades at $158.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check NBIX's competition here
IMAB vs GMAB Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while GMAB trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check GMAB's competition here
IMAB vs JAZZ Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while JAZZ trades at $228.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 1921.58. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check JAZZ's competition here
IMAB vs ASND Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ASND trades at $229.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASND's ROE of -56.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ASND's competition here
IMAB vs EXEL Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while EXEL trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check EXEL's competition here
IMAB vs BBIO Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BBIO trades at $66.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.18. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BBIO's competition here
IMAB vs AXSM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while AXSM trades at $252.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -67.94. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check AXSM's competition here
IMAB vs KRTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check KRTX's competition here
IMAB vs IONS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while IONS trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -36.80. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check IONS's competition here
IMAB vs MDGL Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MDGL trades at $503.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -36.99. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MDGL's competition here
IMAB vs RNAM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RNAM's competition here
IMAB vs SMMT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while SMMT trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check SMMT's competition here
IMAB vs ARWR Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ARWR trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -33.99. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ARWR's competition here
IMAB vs BMRN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BMRN trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 40.04. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BMRN's competition here
IMAB vs KRYS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while KRYS trades at $324.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 43.47. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check KRYS's competition here
IMAB vs RXDX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RXDX's competition here
IMAB vs NUVL Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while NUVL trades at $123.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -20.36. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check NUVL's competition here
IMAB vs CORT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CORT trades at $83.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 237.49. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CORT's competition here
IMAB vs CYTK Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CYTK trades at $74.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CYTK's competition here
IMAB vs TECH Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while TECH trades at $56.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 80.23. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check TECH's competition here
IMAB vs IMGN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check IMGN's competition here
IMAB vs HALO Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while HALO trades at $68.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check HALO's competition here
IMAB vs BPMC Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BPMC's competition here
IMAB vs CERE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CERE's competition here
IMAB vs TGTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while TGTX trades at $50.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check TGTX's competition here
IMAB vs IBRX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while IBRX trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check IBRX's competition here
IMAB vs MTSR Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MTSR's competition here
IMAB vs ALKS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ALKS trades at $43.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 49.29. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ALKS's competition here
IMAB vs PTGX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while PTGX trades at $109.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -62.13. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check PTGX's competition here
IMAB vs PCVX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while PCVX trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -7.19. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check PCVX's competition here
IMAB vs KYMR Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while KYMR trades at $86.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -23.91. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check KYMR's competition here
IMAB vs IMVT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while IMVT trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check IMVT's competition here
IMAB vs MRUS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MRUS's competition here
IMAB vs ACLX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ACLX trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ACLX's competition here
IMAB vs RETA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RETA's competition here
IMAB vs LEGN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while LEGN trades at $33.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -25.71. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check LEGN's competition here
IMAB vs ABVX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ABVX trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ABVX's competition here
IMAB vs LQDA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while LQDA trades at $68.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is 422.35. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LQDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check LQDA's competition here
IMAB vs PTCT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while PTCT trades at $72.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is -30.22. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PTCT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check PTCT's competition here
IMAB vs RYTM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RYTM trades at $89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -28.66. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RYTM's competition here
IMAB vs CNTA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CNTA trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CNTA's competition here
IMAB vs BLTE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while BLTE trades at $138.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -56.79. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check BLTE's competition here
IMAB vs COGT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while COGT trades at $32.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COGT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check COGT's competition here
IMAB vs CDTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CDTX's competition here
IMAB vs PRAX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while PRAX trades at $261.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check PRAX's competition here
IMAB vs ABCM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ABCM's competition here
IMAB vs ISEE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ISEE's competition here
IMAB vs SRRK Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while SRRK trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check SRRK's competition here
IMAB vs APGE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while APGE trades at $84.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check APGE's competition here
IMAB vs FBIOX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while FBIOX trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check FBIOX's competition here
IMAB vs APLS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while APLS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to APLS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check APLS's competition here
IMAB vs CGON Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CGON trades at $59.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -25.45. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CGON's competition here
IMAB vs CAI Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CAI trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -6.59. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CAI's competition here
IMAB vs LGND Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while LGND trades at $252.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check LGND's competition here
IMAB vs CRSP Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CRSP trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -8.53. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CRSP's competition here
IMAB vs MIRM Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MIRM trades at $103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MIRM's competition here
IMAB vs SYRE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while SYRE trades at $82.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -39.42. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check SYRE's competition here
IMAB vs TVTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, TVTX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while TVTX trades at $53.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TVTX's P/E ratio is -107.60. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TVTX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to TVTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check TVTX's competition here
IMAB vs TERN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while TERN trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.41. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check TERN's competition here
IMAB vs FOLD Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while FOLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check FOLD's competition here
IMAB vs AKRO Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check AKRO's competition here
IMAB vs ERAS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ERAS trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ERAS's competition here
IMAB vs ALPN Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ALPN's competition here
IMAB vs CELC Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CELC trades at $87.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -22.63. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CELC's competition here
IMAB vs OPT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OPT's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check OPT's competition here
IMAB vs XENE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while XENE trades at $51.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -11.15. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check XENE's competition here
IMAB vs MRTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MRTX's competition here
IMAB vs TNGX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, TNGX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while TNGX trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TNGX's P/E ratio is -39.64. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TNGX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to TNGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check TNGX's competition here
IMAB vs MANE Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, MANE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while MANE trades at $93.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MANE's P/E ratio is -36.49. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MANE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to MANE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check MANE's competition here
IMAB vs KNSA Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while KNSA trades at $51.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 57.52. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check KNSA's competition here
IMAB vs VCYT Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while VCYT trades at $52.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 45.51. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check VCYT's competition here
IMAB vs CPRX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CPRX trades at $31.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CPRX's competition here
IMAB vs EWTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while EWTX trades at $34.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -21.21. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check EWTX's competition here
IMAB vs RYZB Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check RYZB's competition here
IMAB vs CBAY Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CBAY's competition here
IMAB vs CRNX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while CRNX trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check CRNX's competition here
IMAB vs ACAD Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while ACAD trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check ACAD's competition here
IMAB vs NAMS Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while NAMS trades at $30.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -17.19. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is less volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check NAMS's competition here
IMAB vs NAMSW Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, NAMSW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while NAMSW trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NAMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NAMSW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to NAMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check NAMSW's competition here
IMAB vs SWTX Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check SWTX's competition here
IMAB vs DNLI Comparison June 2026
IMAB plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMAB stands at 542M. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IMAB is priced at $2.88, while DNLI trades at $22.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMAB currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, IMAB's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, IMAB is more volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMAB.Check DNLI's competition here