Triller Group Inc.
Triller Group Inc. ILLRW Peers
See (ILLRW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILLRW | $0.10 | +18.76% | 142.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GOOGL | $173.65 | +3.24% | 2.1T | 19.38 | $8.96 | +0.46% |
| GOOG | $174.92 | +3.01% | 2.1T | 19.33 | $9.05 | +0.46% |
| META | $697.71 | +1.91% | 1.8T | 27.25 | $25.60 | +0.29% |
| SPOT | $712.42 | -0.06% | 143.1B | 112.37 | $6.34 | N/A |
| DASH | $218.45 | +1.21% | 92.6B | 276.52 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | N/A | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $85.81 | -0.05% | 29.5B | 8.51 | $10.08 | N/A |
| TME | $17.97 | +1.07% | 27.7B | 21.14 | $0.85 | +1.00% |
| PINS | $34.20 | +1.30% | 23.1B | 12.57 | $2.72 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ILLRW vs GOOGL Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GOOGL trades at $173.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GOOG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GOOG trades at $174.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs META Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while META trades at $697.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SPOT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 143.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SPOT trades at $712.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 112.37. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DASH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while DASH trades at $218.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 276.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TWTR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BIDU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while BIDU trades at $85.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TME Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TME trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PINS Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while PINS trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs RDDT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while RDDT trades at $121.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TWLO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TWLO trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -529.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ZG trades at $69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -198.31. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs Z Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while Z trades at $70.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -200.83. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YNDX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SNAP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SNAP trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -26.68. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NBIS Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while NBIS trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -24.89. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MTCH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while MTCH trades at $31.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DJT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while DJT trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DJTWW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while DJTWW trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IACVV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CARG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while CARG trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 86.46. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IAC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while IAC trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs WB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while WB trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YELP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while YELP trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GENI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GENI trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -49.87. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DOYU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while DOYU trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while NN trades at $11.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -11.74. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ANGIV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GRPN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GRPN trades at $32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -32.94. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TBLAW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TBLAW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MOMO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while MOMO trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FVRR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while FVRR trades at $33.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TBLA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TBLA trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs JFIN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while JFIN trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs EVER Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 917.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while EVER trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs OPRA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 849.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while OPRA trades at $18.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ANGI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 791.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ANGI trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ATHM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 765.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ATHM trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MAX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 713.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while MAX trades at $10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GETY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 684.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GETY trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SMWB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 654.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SMWB trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -35.91. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NNAVW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while NNAVW trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SSTK Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 621.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SSTK trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs KIND Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 621.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while KIND trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs THRY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 594.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while THRY trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TTGT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TTGT trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PERI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 462.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while PERI trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -60.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs UPXI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 425M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while UPXI trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ZH trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -133.80. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TRVG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TRVG trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -10.05. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs OB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while OB trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs AREN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 263.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while AREN trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SEAT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SEAT trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -57.33. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ILLR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ILLR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs JOYY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while JOYY trades at $47.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JOYY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TRUE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TRUE trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ASST Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ASST trades at $5.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BZFD Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while BZFD trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CCG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while CCG trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BODY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PODC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while PODC trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GIFT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GIFT trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IZEA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while IZEA trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs EGLX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NAMI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while NAMI trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZDGE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ZDGE trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -19.21. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MNY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while MNY trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BODI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while BODI trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SEATW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SEATW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SCOR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SCOR trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LTRPB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LTRPA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LCFYW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LCFYW trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -155.84. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LYL Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs HRYU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LIZI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FAZE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LKCO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs KRKR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while KRKR trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs QTT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LOV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LCFY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while LCFY trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ONFO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ONFO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CRTD Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while CRTD trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ROI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SLE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SLE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CMCM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while CMCM trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while TC trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MNYWW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while MNYWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs STBX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FAZEW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ONFOW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 569.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while ONFOW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SLGG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FENG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 234K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while FENG trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.47. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SOGP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 32.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while SOGP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GROM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GROMW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BLCT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 142.7M. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.10, while BLCT trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.