Triller Group Inc.
Triller Group Inc. ILLRW Peers
See (ILLRW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Internet Content & Information Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILLRW | $0.09 | +0.00% | 133.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GOOG | $178.70 | +0.59% | 2.2T | 19.96 | $8.95 | +0.57% |
| GOOGL | $177.62 | +0.57% | 2.2T | 19.82 | $8.96 | +0.57% |
| META | $727.24 | -0.76% | 1.8T | 28.41 | $25.60 | +0.28% |
| SPOT | $709.95 | -1.69% | 142.6B | 107.57 | $6.60 | N/A |
| DASH | $238.24 | -3.18% | 95B | 301.58 | $0.79 | N/A |
| TWTR | $53.70 | +0.66% | 41.1B | 214.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| BIDU | $88.44 | -0.25% | 30.6B | 8.75 | $10.11 | N/A |
| TME | $20.00 | -1.72% | 29.7B | 23.52 | $0.85 | +0.90% |
| RDDT | $143.00 | -1.82% | 26.3B | 28.61 | $4.99 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ILLRW vs GOOG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GOOG trades at $178.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 19.96. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GOOGL Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GOOGL trades at $177.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs META Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while META trades at $727.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SPOT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SPOT trades at $709.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 107.57. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DASH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while DASH trades at $238.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 301.58. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TWTR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TWTR trades at $53.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BIDU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while BIDU trades at $88.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TME Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TME trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs RDDT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while RDDT trades at $143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PINS Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while PINS trades at $35.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs Z Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while Z trades at $78.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -225.46. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ZG trades at $76.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -217.63. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TWLO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TWLO trades at $117.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -488.71. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SNAP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SNAP trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.16. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YNDX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while YNDX trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NBIS Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while NBIS trades at $46.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -28.12. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MTCH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while MTCH trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DJT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while DJT trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DJTWW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while DJTWW trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -25.79. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CARG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while CARG trades at $34.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 93.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IACVV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while IACVV trades at $40.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IAC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while IAC trades at $41.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs JOYY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while JOYY trades at $53.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -21.54. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GENI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GENI trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -55.21. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs WB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while WB trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YELP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while YELP trades at $35.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs DOYU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while DOYU trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while NN trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -16.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs YY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while YY trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GRPN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GRPN trades at $35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -35.43. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ANGIV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MOMO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while MOMO trades at $8.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TBLAW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TBLAW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TBLA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TBLA trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 91.88. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FVRR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 988.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while FVRR trades at $27.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs JFIN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 980.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while JFIN trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs EVER Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 916.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while EVER trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NNAVW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 889.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while NNAVW trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs OPRA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 882.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while OPRA trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ANGI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 808.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ANGI trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ATHM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 797.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ATHM trades at $26.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GETY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GETY trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MAX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 724.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while MAX trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 37.03. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SMWB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 716.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SMWB trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -39.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SSTK Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SSTK trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs KIND Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 644.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while KIND trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs THRY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 581.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while THRY trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TTGT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 512.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TTGT trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PERI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 504.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while PERI trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -62.22. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs UPXI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 477.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while UPXI trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZH Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 409.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ZH trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -159.33. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs AREN Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while AREN trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TRVG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TRVG trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -8.98. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs OB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while OB trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SEAT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SEAT trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -61.70. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TRUE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TRUE trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ILLR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 110.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ILLR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ASST Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ASST trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BZFD Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while BZFD trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CCG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while CCG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs PODC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while PODC trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BODY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while BODY trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ZDGE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 51.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ZDGE trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -30.23. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs IZEA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while IZEA trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MNY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 44.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while MNY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs EGLX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while EGLX trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GIFT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GIFT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs NAMI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while NAMI trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SOGP Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SOGP trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs BODI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while BODI trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SCOR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SCOR trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LTRPB Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LTRPA Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LCFYW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LCFYW trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -173.64. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SEATW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SEATW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to SEATW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LYL Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LYL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs HRYU Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while HRYU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LIZI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LIZI trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FAZE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while FAZE trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FAZEW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LKCO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LKCO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs KRKR Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while KRKR trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LCFY Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LCFY trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SLE Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SLE trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs QTT Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while QTT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs LOV Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while LOV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ONFO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ONFO trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ROI Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ROI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CRTD Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while CRTD trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs CMCM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while CMCM trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs TC Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while TC trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs MNYWW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while MNYWW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to MNYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs STBX Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while STBX trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs ONFOW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 626.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while ONFOW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs SLGG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while SLGG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs FENG Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 254.2K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while FENG trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GROM Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 8.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GROM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to GROM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs GROMW Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while GROMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.
ILLRW vs AUTO Comparison
ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 133.8M. In comparison, AUTO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.09, while AUTO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUTO's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to AUTO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is more volatile compared to AUTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.