Triller Group Inc.

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GOOG has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GOOG trades at $192.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOG's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOG's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GOOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GOOG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GOOGL has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GOOGL trades at $191.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOOGL's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GOOGL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GOOGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GOOGL's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, META has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while META trades at $773.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas META's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to META's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to META. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check META's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SPOT has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SPOT trades at $626.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPOT's P/E ratio is 139.48. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SPOT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SPOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SPOT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, DASH has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while DASH trades at $250.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DASH's P/E ratio is 316.77. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DASH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DASH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check DASH's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TWTR has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TWTR trades at $53.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWTR's P/E ratio is 214.80. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWTR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TWTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TWTR's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TME has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TME trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TME's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TME's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, BIDU has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while BIDU trades at $87.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIDU's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BIDU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check BIDU's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, RDDT has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while RDDT trades at $160.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDDT's P/E ratio is 32.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to RDDT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to RDDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check RDDT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, PINS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while PINS trades at $38.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PINS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PINS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to PINS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check PINS's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TWLO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TWLO trades at $129.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWLO's P/E ratio is -560.91. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TWLO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TWLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TWLO's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, Z has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while Z trades at $79.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas Z's P/E ratio is -227.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to Z's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to Z. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check Z's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ZG has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ZG trades at $76.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZG's P/E ratio is -219.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ZG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SNAP has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SNAP trades at $9.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNAP's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SNAP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SNAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SNAP's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, YNDX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while YNDX trades at $18.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YNDX's P/E ratio is -15.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YNDX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to YNDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check YNDX's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while NBIS trades at $54.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -32.79. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NBIS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check NBIS's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, MTCH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while MTCH trades at $34.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTCH's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MTCH's ROE of -4.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to MTCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check MTCH's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, DJTWW has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while DJTWW trades at $10.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJTWW's P/E ratio is -24.57. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJTWW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DJTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check DJTWW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, DJT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while DJT trades at $17.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DJT's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DJT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check DJT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, IACVV has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while IACVV trades at $40.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IACVV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IACVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to IACVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check IACVV's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, CARG has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while CARG trades at $32.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CARG's P/E ratio is 88.70. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CARG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to CARG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check CARG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, IAC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while IAC trades at $39.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAC's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IAC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to IAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check IAC's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GENI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GENI trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENI's P/E ratio is -59.26. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GENI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GENI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GENI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, DOYU has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while DOYU trades at $8.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DOYU's P/E ratio is -6.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to DOYU's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to DOYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check DOYU's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, JOYY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while JOYY trades at $50.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JOYY's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JOYY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to JOYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check JOYY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, WB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while WB trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WB's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to WB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to WB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check WB's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, YELP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while YELP trades at $34.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YELP's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YELP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to YELP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check YELP's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, YY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while YY trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YY's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to YY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to YY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check YY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, NN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while NN trades at $14.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NN's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NN's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check NN's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ANGIV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ANGIV trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGIV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGIV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ANGIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ANGIV's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, MOMO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while MOMO trades at $8.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOMO's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MOMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to MOMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check MOMO's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GRPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GRPN trades at $30.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRPN's P/E ratio is -30.84. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GRPN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GRPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GRPN's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TBLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TBLA trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLA's P/E ratio is 80.25. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TBLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TBLA's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, EVER has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while EVER trades at $24.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVER's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EVER's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to EVER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check EVER's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TBLAW has a market cap of 823.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TBLAW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TBLAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TBLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TBLAW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ATHM has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ATHM trades at $27.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHM's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ATHM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ATHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ATHM's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, NNAVW has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while NNAVW trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NNAVW's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NNAVW's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NNAVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check NNAVW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, FVRR has a market cap of 793.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while FVRR trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVRR's P/E ratio is 45.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FVRR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FVRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check FVRR's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ANGI has a market cap of 778.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ANGI trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANGI's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ANGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ANGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ANGI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, OPRA has a market cap of 741.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while OPRA trades at $16.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPRA's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OPRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to OPRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check OPRA's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GETY has a market cap of 732.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GETY trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GETY's P/E ratio is -9.81. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GETY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GETY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GETY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, KIND has a market cap of 719.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while KIND trades at $1.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KIND's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KIND's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to KIND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check KIND's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 711.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while JFIN trades at $13.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check JFIN's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SMWB has a market cap of 694.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SMWB trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMWB's P/E ratio is -38.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SMWB's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SMWB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SMWB's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SSTK has a market cap of 680.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SSTK trades at $19.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSTK's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SSTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SSTK's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, MAX has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while MAX trades at $10.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAX's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MAX's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to MAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check MAX's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, THRY has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while THRY trades at $13.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to THRY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to THRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check THRY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TTGT has a market cap of 517.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TTGT trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTGT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TTGT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TTGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TTGT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, PERI has a market cap of 487.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while PERI trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PERI's P/E ratio is -60.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PERI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to PERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check PERI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ZH has a market cap of 386.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ZH trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZH's P/E ratio is -140.83. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ZH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ZH's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, AREN has a market cap of 290.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while AREN trades at $6.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AREN's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to AREN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to AREN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check AREN's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TRVG has a market cap of 278.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TRVG trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRVG's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRVG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TRVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TRVG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, OB has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while OB trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OB's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to OB's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to OB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check OB's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, UPXI has a market cap of 249.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while UPXI trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPXI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to UPXI's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to UPXI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check UPXI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SEAT has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SEAT trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEAT's P/E ratio is -51.67. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SEAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SEAT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TRUE has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TRUE trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRUE's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TRUE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TRUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TRUE's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ILLR has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ILLR trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILLR's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ILLR's ROE of +4.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ILLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ILLR's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, BZFD has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while BZFD trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZFD's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BZFD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BZFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check BZFD's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, MNY has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while MNY trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNY's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNY's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to MNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check MNY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, IZEA has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while IZEA trades at $3.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IZEA's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to IZEA's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to IZEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check IZEA's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, CCG has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while CCG trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCG's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CCG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to CCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check CCG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, BODY has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while BODY trades at $8.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODY's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check BODY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ZDGE has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ZDGE trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZDGE's P/E ratio is -31.12. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ZDGE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ZDGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ZDGE's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ASST has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ASST trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASST's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ASST's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ASST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ASST's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, PODC has a market cap of 43.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while PODC trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PODC's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to PODC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to PODC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check PODC's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, EGLX has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while EGLX trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGLX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to EGLX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to EGLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check EGLX's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GIFT trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GIFT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, BODI has a market cap of 30.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while BODI trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BODI's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BODI's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check BODI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SCOR has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SCOR trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCOR's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SCOR's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SCOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SCOR's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, NAMI has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while NAMI trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAMI's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to NAMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to NAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check NAMI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SOGP has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SOGP trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOGP's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SOGP's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SOGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SOGP's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LTRPA has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LTRPA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LTRPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LTRPA's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LTRPB has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LTRPB trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LTRPB's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LTRPB's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LTRPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LTRPB's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SEATW has a market cap of 18.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SEATW trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEATW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SEATW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW and SEATW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEATW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LYL has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LYL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYL's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LYL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LYL's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, HRYU has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while HRYU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRYU's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to HRYU's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to HRYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check HRYU's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LIZI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LIZI trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIZI's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LIZI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LIZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LIZI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LCFYW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LCFYW trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFYW's P/E ratio is -136.36. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFYW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LCFYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LCFYW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, FAZEW has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while FAZEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZEW's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FAZEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check FAZEW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, FAZE has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while FAZE trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAZE's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FAZE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FAZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check FAZE's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LKCO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LKCO trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKCO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LKCO's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LKCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LKCO's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, KRKR has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while KRKR trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRKR's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to KRKR's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to KRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check KRKR's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LCFY has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LCFY trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCFY's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LCFY's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LCFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LCFY's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ONFO has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ONFO trades at $1.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFO's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ONFO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ONFO's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, QTT has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while QTT trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTT's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to QTT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to QTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check QTT's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, LOV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while LOV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to LOV's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to LOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check LOV's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ROI has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ROI trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ROI's ROE of -12.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ROI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ROI's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, CRTD has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while CRTD trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRTD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CRTD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to CRTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check CRTD's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SLE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SLE trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLE's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLE's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SLE's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, MNYWW has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while MNYWW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to MNYWW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW and MNYWW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNYWW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, CMCM has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while CMCM trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCM's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to CMCM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to CMCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check CMCM's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, TC has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while TC trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to TC's ROE of +2.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to TC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check TC's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, STBX has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while STBX trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to STBX's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to STBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check STBX's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, ONFOW has a market cap of 744K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while ONFOW trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ONFOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to ONFOW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to ONFOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check ONFOW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, SLGG has a market cap of 291.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while SLGG trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGG's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to SLGG's ROE of +4.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to SLGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check SLGG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, FENG has a market cap of 243K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while FENG trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FENG's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to FENG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to FENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check FENG's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GROM has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GROM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW and GROM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GROM's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, GROMW has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while GROMW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GROMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to GROMW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to GROMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check GROMW's competition here

ILLRW plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ILLRW stands at 104.5M. In comparison, BLCT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ILLRW is priced at $0.06, while BLCT trades at $1.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ILLRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLCT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ILLRW's ROE is +4.47%, compared to BLCT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ILLRW is less volatile compared to BLCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ILLRW.Check BLCT's competition here