Imperial Metals Corporation
Imperial Metals Corporation III.TO Peers
See (III.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Copper Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| III.TO | $3.81 | +4.96% | 617.04M | 5.86 | $0.65 | N/A |
| FM.TO | $20.20 | +0.15% | 16.73B | 80.80 | $0.25 | N/A |
| LUN.TO | $12.68 | +1.93% | 11.00B | 1268.00 | $0.01 | +2.89% |
| CS.TO | $7.22 | +0.98% | 5.50B | -34.38 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| HBM.TO | $12.08 | +3.60% | 4.77B | 43.14 | $0.28 | +0.17% |
| ERO.TO | $18.66 | -2.05% | 1.93B | 74.64 | $0.25 | N/A |
| IE.TO | $9.42 | +0.43% | 1.25B | -8.05 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| TKO.TO | $2.88 | -2.37% | 909.72M | -13.71 | -$0.21 | N/A |
| AYM.TO | $5.78 | +8.85% | 835.77M | 10.70 | $0.54 | N/A |
| CMMC.TO | $2.49 | -1.19% | 533.81M | -9.58 | -$0.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
III.TO vs FM.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, FM.TO has a market cap of 16.73B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while FM.TO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FM.TO's P/E ratio is 80.80. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FM.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to FM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs LUN.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, LUN.TO has a market cap of 11.00B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while LUN.TO trades at $12.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas LUN.TO's P/E ratio is 1268.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LUN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to LUN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs CS.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, CS.TO has a market cap of 5.50B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while CS.TO trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CS.TO's P/E ratio is -34.38. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CS.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to CS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs HBM.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, HBM.TO has a market cap of 4.77B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while HBM.TO trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas HBM.TO's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBM.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO and HBM.TO have similar daily volatility (5.09).
III.TO vs ERO.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, ERO.TO has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while ERO.TO trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ERO.TO's P/E ratio is 74.64. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ERO.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to ERO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs IE.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, IE.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while IE.TO trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas IE.TO's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IE.TO's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to IE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs TKO.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, TKO.TO has a market cap of 909.72M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while TKO.TO trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas TKO.TO's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TKO.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to TKO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs AYM.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, AYM.TO has a market cap of 835.77M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while AYM.TO trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AYM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AYM.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to AYM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs CMMC.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, CMMC.TO has a market cap of 533.81M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while CMMC.TO trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CMMC.TO's P/E ratio is -9.58. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMMC.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to CMMC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs MARI.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, MARI.TO has a market cap of 472.45M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while MARI.TO trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas MARI.TO's P/E ratio is -24.58. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MARI.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to MARI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs ASCU.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, ASCU.TO has a market cap of 300.00M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while ASCU.TO trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ASCU.TO's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASCU.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to ASCU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs ARG.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, ARG.TO has a market cap of 284.37M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while ARG.TO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas ARG.TO's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARG.TO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to ARG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs FDY.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, FDY.TO has a market cap of 164.41M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while FDY.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas FDY.TO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FDY.TO's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to FDY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs NCU.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, NCU.TO has a market cap of 42.89M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while NCU.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas NCU.TO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NCU.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to NCU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs DNT.TO Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, DNT.TO has a market cap of 38.81M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while DNT.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas DNT.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNT.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to DNT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs RCLF.CN Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, RCLF.CN has a market cap of 17.53M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while RCLF.CN trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas RCLF.CN's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RCLF.CN's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. III.TO has daily volatility of 5.09 and RCLF.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
III.TO vs CCI.CN Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, CCI.CN has a market cap of 16.50M. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while CCI.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas CCI.CN's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCI.CN's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is less volatile compared to CCI.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs AFX.CN Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, AFX.CN has a market cap of 704674.00. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while AFX.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas AFX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AFX.CN's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to AFX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.
III.TO vs JUBA.CN Comparison
III.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, III.TO stands at 617.04M. In comparison, JUBA.CN has a market cap of 681016.00. Regarding current trading prices, III.TO is priced at $3.81, while JUBA.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
III.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 5.86, whereas JUBA.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, III.TO's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBA.CN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, III.TO is more volatile compared to JUBA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for III.TO.